Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.58s
Fenske Bros. v. Upholsterers International Union of North America, Local No. 18
358 Ill. 239 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1934
Yet it was held that laborers may use persuasion to induce men to join their organization or to refuse to work except for an established wage; that they may present their cause to the public in newspapers or circulars in … On the contrary, he who challenges the constitutionality of a legislative act has the burden of clearly showing wherein the act violates the constitution. Every presumption is in favor of the validity of the act.
Cited 71 timesPublished2023 IL App (1st) 221116 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 15, 2023
An instruction does not justify reversal unless it clearly misled the jury and resulted in prejudice to the appellant. Dynek v. City of Chicago, 2020 IL App (1st) 190209, ¶ 25. … Illinois Power Co., 62 Ill. 2d 456, 468 (1976), the supreme court established the standard for a landowner’s liability for a dangerous condition on the land.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMontgomery Ward & Co. v. United Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Employees of America
330 Ill. App. 49 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 20, 1946
The injunction clearly constitutes a previous restraint on publication. … immunity from previous restraints extends to the false and libelous as well as to the true.
Cited 11 timesPublishedRoberts Park Fire Protection District v. Village of Bridgeview
20 Ill. App. 3d 282 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 6, 1974
That part of the Village which is located within the District has some residential uses and also some industrial and mercantile establishments. … This court does not wish to be placed in the position of approving a disconnection with resulting substantial loss of tax revenue to the District where the evidence shows so clearly that such action would impair the present
Reversed on other grounds by Roberts Park Fire Protection District v. Village of Bridgeview, 61 Ill. 2d 429 (1975)Cited 9 timesPublished10 Ill. 2d 430 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1957
She was subjected to an examination by the court to determine her competency; the court found that the child had sufficient mental perception and moral understanding to qualify her to speak as a witness. … It was given t^ '•ebut the direct evidence given by the defendant, and was clearly admissible for that purpose.
Cited 111 timesPublishedPeoria Housing Authority v. Sanders
2 Ill. App. 3d 610 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 8, 1971
Defendant's income was sufficiently low that she qualified under the Housing Authority's program and an apartment was rented to her. … The rent was established by the Authority on the basis of defendant's income and expenses.
Cited 4 timesPublished2020 IL App (1st) 182239 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 23, 2021
Her major disagreement was about whether respondent qualifies as an SVP. ¶ 44 She did not believe that respondent qualified for two reasons. First, his age. … Smith—on the presence of a mental disorder). ¶ 71 Respondent next argues that, “[e]ven if the State established that Mr.
Cited 26 timesPublishedRyan v. E.A.I. Construction Corp.
158 Ill. App. 3d 449 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 21, 1987
Well-established rules govern Structural Work Act cases. The Act is designed to protect workers engaged in extrahazardous activities from certain risks inherent in the nature of their jobs. (Urman v. … Gordon was not qualified to testify whether the standards were incorporated by reference and even if so qualified, his testimony was an impermissible statutory interpretation. The record shows however that Mr.
Cited 28 timesPublishedCapitol Converting Equipment, Inc. v. LEP Transport, Inc.
750 F. Supp. 862 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 19, 1990
Under § 1-205(3), a course of dealing between parties “give[s] particular meaning to and supplements] or qualifies] terms of an agreement.” … 205(3), it also clearly establishes that course of dealing should be accorded more weight in contract construction: *866 The express terms of an agreement and an applicable course of dealing or usage of trade shall be construed
Cited 12 timesPublished294 Ill. App. 3d 435 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 27, 1998
To state a cause of action for fraud, a party must establish, inter alla, that a person made a false statement of material fact and that the aggrieved party justifiably relied on the truth of the statement. … the intent of the General Assembly clearly requires otherwise.
Cited 19 timesPublishedNguyen v. New Link Genetics Corp.
297 F. Supp. 3d 472 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Mar 29, 2018
As NewLink's most advanced treatment candidate, HyperAcute Pancreas is designed to stimulate the human immune system to recognize and attack cancer cells. (Compl. ¶ 2.) … Litig. , 252 F.3d 63 , 75 (2d Cir. 2001) (selling 80 percent of holdings sufficient to establish motive).
Cited 15 timesPublished25 Ill. App. 3d 35 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 23, 1975
In fact, many instances cited by the defendant as evidencing the State’s Attorney’s “prejudicial” remarks and elicitation of “prejudicial” testimony were clearly within the range of permissible latitude and, consequently, … Having considered all of the assignments of error, we are of the opinion that the evidence was sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt, that she received a fair trial, free from prejudicial error, and that tire maximum
Cited 4 timesPublished113 Ill. App. 3d 910 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 8, 1983
There remains for us the question which law determines who qualifies as a member of the class “right heirs,” that in effect at the execution of the will or that in effect at the date of distribution. … Tyler was adopted in 1919 before the will was executed in and of itself would be insufficient to establish a contrary general intent. Cf. Munie v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedSteffes v. Vulcan Materials Co.
144 Ill. 2d 284 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1991
The appellate court in Round Lake held that petitioners were fee title owners of the property in question and thus qualified as “owners of record” for purposes of the relevant annexation statute (Ill. Rev. … Clearly, petitioners took every precaution to make sure their neighbors were unable to thwart their desires for annexation.
Cited 7 timesPublished735 F. Supp. 1377 · District Court, C.D. Illinois · Apr 24, 1990
Clearly the allegations contained in Count I do not implicate any of the rights guaranteed by the fifth amendment. … In light of this statute and the explication of the doctrine of qualified immunity in Harlow v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 30, 2020
Finally, Defendants argue that they are entitled to qualified immunity. … To decide whether Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity, the court asks two questions: “first, whether the constitutional right asserted by the plaintiff[ ] was clearly established at the time the defendants acted
Cited 0 timesUnknownBank One, Milwaukee, N.A. v. Loeber Motors, Inc.
293 Ill. App. 3d 14 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 10, 1997
By filing its complaint, Bank One sought to enjoin the dealers from repossessing 10 vehicles and a declaratory judgment establishing Bank One as the rightful owner of said vehicles. … Clearly, Bank One qualifies as a "merchant” with respect to the transactions at issue here.
Cited 9 timesPublished321 Ill. App. 3d 92 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 22, 2001
Plaintiffs are litigants who were compelled to pay the fee when they filed their lawsuits for various causes of action but did not qualify as users of the arbitration system. … The party who challenges a statute’s constitutionality bears the heavy burden of clearly establishing the violation alleged. People v. Jeffries, 164 Ill. 2d 104, 111 , 646 N.E.2d 587 (1995).
Cited 14 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · Mar 3, 2022
Nevertheless, a court can deny a qualified plaintiff leave to file in forma pauperis or can dismiss a case if the action is clearly frivolous or malicious or fails to state a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) & (ii). … However, judges are afforded absolute immunity for decisions made in their courtroom regarding cases. “The courts have recognized that certain functions deserve absolute immunity.
Cited 0 timesUnknownArmenian Church of Lake Bluff v. Department of Revenue
2011 IL App (1st) 102249 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 22, 2011
We will set aside an administrative decision as clearly erroneous only when we are left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake was made. Grace Community Church, 409 Ill. … In addition, Reverend Michaels’ residence on the property qualifies as a parsonage, an alternative ground for exemption.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna