Case law

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Pate

441 P.2d 393 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1967

Oklahoma Bar Ass’n v. … In State of Oklahoma v.

STATE EX REL. INDEP. SCH. DIST. 1 v. Barnes

762 P.2d 921 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1988

Davis v. Davis, 708 P.2d 1102 (Okl. 1985), Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666 (Okl. 1973), and State ex rel. Ogden v. Hunt, 286 P.2d 1088 (Okl. 1955). … Oldham v. Drummond Board of Education of Independent School District No. I-85, 542 P.2d 1309 (Okl. 1975).

Taylor v. STATE EX REL. EMP. SEC. COM'N

867 P.2d 490 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1993

Hayhurst v. Hayhurst, 421 P.2d 257 (Okl. 1966). … Meek v. Williams, 441 P.2d 420 (Okl. 1968).

Opinion No. 69-183 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 5, 1969

We have checked other provisions of law and find no authority for the county or its governing board, the Board of County Commissioners, to expend county funds for the purpose of building a retention dam for a non-profit water … In the case of Allen V.

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

157 Okla. 131 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1932

Bowling v. Merry, 91 Okla. 176 , 217 P. 404 ; Hawkins v. Bryan, 128 Okla. 27 , 261 P. 167 ; Orth v. Hajek, 127 Okla. 50 ; 259 P. 854 ; Greer v. McNeal, 11 Okla. 519 , 69 P. 891 ; Hocker v. … We-held in a recent case, No. 21386, County Excise Board of Creek County v.

Opinion No. 71-290 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 1971

Additionally the Board of County Commissioners may enter into such contract only if prior to the passage of Section 371, the Board had attempted to contract for such service. … The Court has held in State v. Hunt, Okl., 286 P.2d 1088 (1955) in construing the word "shall": ". . .In the construction of statutes, the word `shall' is usually given its common meaning of `must' . . ."

SAVE THE ILLINOIS RIVER, INC. v. STATE ex. rel. OKLA. STATE ELECTION BD.

2016 OK 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 8, 2016

v. … STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL LICENSURE Cited 1946 OK 171, 170 P.2d 208, 197 Okla. 291, HARDING v. STATE ELECTION BD. Discussed 1960 OK 245, 357 P.2d 421, WICKERSHAM v.

Cooper v. State

552 P.2d 406 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 9, 1976

Brown, 10 Cir., 456 F.2d 18 . This Court has previously held that the decision in Lamb v. … Brown, supra, did not serve to hold as unconstitutional the otherwise valid laws in existence under our Juvenile Code prior to April 4, 1972. In Dean v.

Opinion No. 75-132 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1975

The Board shall consider a report of the circumstances of the case to be presented by a hearing examiner appointed by the Board. … City of Tulsa v. Goins, Okl., 437 P.2d 257 259 (1967). Therefore, the hearing examiner's report is by law one basis of the Board's final decision in a case, and is a proper part of the record.

Alluwee Oil Co. v. Shufflin

32 Okla. 808 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1912

Garrett et al. v. Walcott, 25 Okla. 574, 106 Pac. 848 ; Baldwin v. Keith, 13 Okla. 624 , 75 Pac. 1124 ; James v. Germania Iron Co., 107 Fed. 597 , 46 C. C. A. 476 ; Wallace v. Adams, 143 Fed. 716 , 74 C. C. … Ed. 800 ; Steel v. Refining Co., 106 U. S. 447, 451 , 1 Sup. Ct. 389, 27 L. Ed. 226 ; French v. Fyan, 93 U. S. 169, 172 , 23 L. Ed. 812 ; Ehrhardt v. Hogaboom, 115 U. S. 67, 69 , 5 Sup. Ct. 1157, 29 L.

Hall v. State

565 P.2d 57 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 27, 1977

. *59 The trial court held an in camera hearing as required by Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967), and Thompson v. … Melot v. State, Okl.Cr., 375 P.2d 343 (1962); however, in the instant case we do not feel that it was required. The question of witness identification has been discussed at length in Commonwealth v.

Opinion No. 75-302 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 13, 1975

In Article V , Section 36 of the Oklahoma Constitution, legislative authority is set forth as follows: "The authority of the legislature shall extend to all rightful subjects of legislation, and any specific grant of authority … Cr., 87 P.2d 1106 (1939); Coburn v. Schroeder, Okl. Cr., 112 P.2d 191 (1941) and Ex parte Barrett, Okl. Cr., 132 P.2d 657 (1942). Also pertinent to this question is the holding in Petition of Leaser, Okl.

W. S. Thompson Co. v. Bond, County Treas.

47 Okla. 547 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1915

BROWN, J. This is an appeal from a judgment of the county court, rendered April 18, 1914, on appeal to said court from the action of Henry C. … In the case of McAlester Trust Co. v.

Coleman-Nelson Gasoline Co. v. Montgomery

151 Okla. 286 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 26, 1931

In the ease of Smith v. … In the case of Clewell v.

Chelsea Elevator & Storage Co. v. Rohland

30 Okla. 54 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1911

Finch et al. v. Brown et al., 27 Okla. 217 , 111 Pac. 391 . It has also been decided that such omissions in the case-made cannot be supplied by a certificate of the stenographer. Tootle, Wheeler & Motter Mer. Co. v. … Wade v. Gould, 8 Okla. 690 , 59 Pac. 11 .

Bulgin v. American Law Book Co.

77 Okla. 112 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1920

Howie Mining Co. v. McGary, 256 Fed. 38 . … Merryman v. McQuillan, 53 Okla. 590 , 157 Pac. 319 ; Bilby v. Continental Gin Co., 53 Okla. 316 , 156 Pac. 199 ; Culbertson v. Walton Trust Co., 49 Okla. 103 , 152 Pac. 355 ; Brown v.

Atwater v. Hassett

27 Okla. 292 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1910

State ex rel. v. Hooker, County Judge, 22 Okla. 712 , 98 Pac. 964 ; Rea, County Clerk, v. Board of County Com’rs., infra. … In Patterson v.

Calloway v. State

38 Okla. Crim. 418 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1928

Brown persisted in stating in the record his statement in the presence of the jury.” … And see Wilson v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 47 , 183 P. 613 ; Harper v. State, 20 Okla. Cr. 43 , 200 P. 879 ; Pusley v. State, 22 Okla. Cr. 192 , 210 P. 306 ; Shields v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 344 , 240 P. 661 .

Crosbie v. State

330 P.2d 602 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 3, 1958

Harley was not an officer of any kind, but only a private attorney working for such Board. Defendant cites and quotes from the case of Shouquette v. … See Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, 294 U.S. 608 , 55 S.Ct. 570 , 79 L.Ed. 1086 . The above proposition was raised in the case of Shewmaker v. State, Okl. Cr., 329 P.2d 858 .

Union Indemnity Co. v. Saling

166 Okla. 133 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1933

Likewise the Supreme Court of the United States has approved this classification of boards similar to our State Industrial Commission. Crowell v. Benson, supra. … It is pointed out that the Industrial Commission, is a board of limited jurisdiction, and the rule announced by the Utah court in the case of Parker v. Industrial Commission of Utah, supra, is invoked.