Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.84s
Watson v. Internal Revenue Services
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2021
As for the Browns, Plaintiff’s claims sound in tort, such as conversion. … Chandler v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 226 F. Supp. 3d 1, 6, n.3 (D.D.C. 2016); see also Coulibaly v. Kerry, 213 F.
Cited 0 timesPublished7 App. D.C. 548 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 1896
Brown to his son, Chapin Brown, subject to the claim of the appellees, Augustus S. … Wylie v. Coxe, 15 How. 415 . It attached immediately upon the rendition of the judgment, and is superior to all others, no matter how created.
Cited 1 timesPublishedVreven v. American Ass'n of Retired Persons
604 F. Supp. 2d 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2009
See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., *13 16 F.3d at 1276 ; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). III. … Novelli made these statements to the Board of Directors, "it is hard to see how [plaintiff] could satisfy the requirement of providing ... ‘fair notice’ " to defendant. Bell Atlantic Corp. v.
Cited 26 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Dec 7, 2022
See United States v. Dieter, 429 U.S. 6, 8 (1976) (per curiam); United States v. Healy, 376 U.S. 75, 80 (1964). … United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAbraham Williams v. United States
403 F.2d 176 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 30, 1968
Appellant and Miss Brown then drove to the market. A few minutes later, Edwards approached appellant in front of the market while Miss Brown shopped inside. … He relies largely upon Gordon v. United States, 344 U.S. 414 , 73 S.Ct. 369 , 97 L.Ed. 447 (1953).
Cited 23 timesPublishedChildren's National Medical Center v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
992 A.2d 403 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 2010
After the Compensation Review Board (“the Board”) affirmed the compensation order, McCormick v. Children’s Nat’l Med. Ctr., CRB No. 09-016, 2009 WL 345799 , 2009 DC Wrk. Comp. … Standard of Review We may reverse a Compensation Review Board decision “only if it is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” McNeal v.
Cited 8 timesPublished667 F.2d 181 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 30, 1981
667 F.2d 181 215 U.S.App.D.C. 138 AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Fleming International Airways, Inc., Intervenor. … AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Federal Express Corporation, Intervenor. AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWright v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
560 A.2d 509 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1989
American Security Trust Co. v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, 376 A.2d 824, 825 (D.C.1977) (quoting Van Stauffenberg v. … See, e.g., Hale v. Common *513 wealth Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 57 Pa.Cmwlth. 245, 247 , 425 A.2d 1216, 1218 (1981); Goughnour v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedConnors v. Hi-Heat Coal Co., Inc.
772 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 24, 1991
See, e.g., Board of Trustees v. Lafrenz, 837 F.2d 892, 894 (9th Cir.1988). … But see Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedPettiford v. Secretary of the Navy
774 F. Supp. 2d 173 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2011
Poole v. … v.
Cited 20 timesPublished469 A.2d 1246 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 1983
The Board made ample efforts to serve him. He left no forwarding address when he left town. Cf. Union Storage Co. v. … We therefore deem the Board’s allegations admitted under Rule XI § 7(2).
Cited 5 timesPublished336 F.2d 753 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 7, 1964
The appellant requested an extension of time to file briefs, but the Board on March 5 issued its decision and direction of elections to be held on March 10, 1964. … Compare Boire v. Greyhound Corp., 376 U.S. 473 , 84 S.Ct. 894 , 11 L.Ed.2d 894 (1964) with Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184 , 79 S.Ct. 180 , 3 L.Ed.2d 210 (1958).
Cited 4 timesPublished26 B.R. 337 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 1982
International Harvester Compa *344 ny v. United States, 342 F.2d 432, 437 , 169 Ct.Cl. 821 , (1965); Lucianna v. Hip Sing Association, 256 A.2d 898 (D.C.App.1969); Brown v. Christman, 126 F.2d 625 (D.C.Cir.1942). … See Garvey v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 2026
Nken v. … .”); Cabaniss v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 2019
) DAVID LEE NELSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … DATE: July 29, 2019 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge
Cited 0 timesPublished703 A.2d 1239 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1997
Littlejohn also saw the other man hand Munn some money; Munn took it and reached into the brown bag. … Settles v. United States, 615 A.2d 1105, 1113-1114 (D.C.1992); Owens v. United States, supra, 497 A.2d at 1091-1092 ; United States v.
Cited 6 timesPublished631 A.2d 1186 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 1993
V. … NOTES [1] Beale v. United States, 465 A.2d 796 (D.C. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984); Brown v.
Cited 18 timesPublished831 A.2d 953 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 2003
The Board likened Mr. Tidwell’s case to a Texas case with similar facts. In Tate v. … D.C.Code § 22-2105 (2001); see Hawkins v. United States, 395 A.2d 45 (D.C.1978).
Cited 8 timesPublishedMills Peninsula Health Services v. Becerra
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 10, 2025
Council, Inc. v. SEC, 606 F.2d 1031, 1055-56 (D.C. Cir. 1979). … The Providers therefore cannot show that the Board’s dismissals were arbitrary and capricious. V.
Cited 0 timesPublished333 F.2d 151 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 21, 1964
A petition seasonably filed with the Election Board nominated Frederick M. McCoy as a candidate in the Democratic primary May 5, 1964. … The arrangement of the ballot in the manner proposed by the Board is, in our view, within the scope of the authority delegated to the Board by the Congress.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna