Case law

Asam v. Alabama State Bar

675 So. 2d 866 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 23, 1996

v. … The Board found Asam guilty of Charges I, III, and V, and not guilty of the remaining charges.

Miller v. ALABAMA STATE TENURE COM'N

451 So. 2d 301 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Feb 22, 1984

Withrow v. Larkin, supra at 56, 95 S.Ct. at 1469 . … Alabama State Tenure Commission v. Mountain Brook Board of Education , 343 So.2d 522 (Ala. 1976), on remand , 343 So.2d 528 (Ala.Civ.App. 1977).

Humana Med. Corp. v. STATE HEALTH PLANNING

460 So. 2d 1295 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Aug 22, 1984

We determined in Hughes v. … Board of Trustees of Policemen's and Firemen's Retirement Fund v. Cardwell , 400 So.2d 402 , 405 (Ala. 1981) (emphasis added).

Jefferson County Sheriff's Department v. Daniels

13 So. 3d 993 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jan 23, 2009

Personnel Bd. of Jefferson County v. Bailey, 475 So.2d 863, 865-66 (Ala.Civ.App.1985). … Hamrick v. Town of Albertville, 223 Ala. 216, 217 , 135 So. 326, 326 (1931). The circuit court erred by failing to dismiss the Department’s appeal.

Thomas v. James

32 Ala. 723 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1858

Such a right would be an interest in the lands, which such a trustee cannot create by means of a submission and award, not assented to by the cestui que trust. — Riddle v. Brown, 20 Ala. 412 . … Riddle v. Brown, supra, and authorities therein cited: 2 Greenlf. on Ev. § 627 and notes; Hill on Trustees, 503.

Roberson v. Oliver

189 Ala. 82 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 7, 1914

In the case of Bryant v. Whisenant, 167 Ala. 325 , 52 South. 525 , 140 Am. St. … —Bryant v. Whisenant et al., supra.

Ex Parte Wright

477 So. 2d 492 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 27, 1985

Vitale , 447 U.S. 410 , 416 , 100 S.Ct. 2260 , 2265 , 65 L.Ed.2d 228 (1980); Whalen v. United States , 445 U.S. 684 , 691 , 100 S.Ct. 1432 , 1437 , 63 L.Ed.2d 715 (1980); Brown v. … Application of Blockburger in light of the facts in question in Brown v.

Pool v. Williams

280 Ala. 337 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 12, 1967

employee file an explanation of his charges to (sic) the Personnel Board.” … Nolting v. Civil Service Commission, 7 Ill.App.2d 147, 152, 153, 154, 163 , 129 N.E.2d 236, 239, 240, 244 .

Dorrough v. MacKenson

229 Ala. 336 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 18, 1934

Wilson v. Callan, 9 Ala. App. 265 , 63 So. 27 ; Brown v. Massey, 3 Stew. 226 ; Brown v. Coats, 56 Ala. 439 ; Melvin v. Scowley, 213 Ala. 414 , 104 So. 817 ; De Jarnette v. Dreyfus, 166 Ala. 138 , 51 So. 932 . … Drakford v. Turk, 75 Ala. 339 ; Brown v. Coats, 56 Ala. 439 ; Melvin v. Scrowley, supra. But that is not the matter sought to be tested in this plea in abatement.

Sgb Const. Services v. Ray Sumlin Const.

644 So. 2d 892 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 6, 1994

See Sumlin v. Hagan Storm Fence Co. of Mobile , 409 So.2d 818 (Ala. 1982). The trial court found that the Board is a public agency incorporated under Ala. … See Medical Clinic Board of the City of Birmingham-Crestwood v. Smelley , 408 So.2d 1203 (Ala. 1981).

Thomas v. State

249 Ala. 358 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 19, 1947

Clemmons v. State, 167 Ala. 20 , 52 So. 467 ; Daniel v. State, 31 Ala.App. 376 , 17 So.2d 542 ; Hicks v. State, 247 Ala. 439 , 25 So.2d 139 ; Phillips v. State, 248 Ala. 510 , 28 So.2d 542 . … J., and BROWN and SIMPSON, JJ., concur.

Ex Parte Batchelor

803 So. 2d 515 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 18, 2001

Brown. (Re Betty BATCHELOR and J.D. Brown v. … v.

Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. v. MARSHALL CTY. BD. OF EDUC.

540 So. 2d 745 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 10, 1989

In Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance Co. v. … Co. v. Stephens, 333 So.2d 777 (Ala.1976); Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. Barnett Millworks, Inc., 364 So.2d 1137 (Ala.1978); American Liberty Ins. Co. v. Soules, 288 Ala. 163 , 258 So.2d 872 (1972).

Smith v. Smith

254 Ala. 404 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 26, 1950

Sharum v. … BROWN, FOSTER, LIVINGSTON, LAWSON and SIMPSON, JJ., concur.

Powell v. State

5 Ala. App. 75 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1912

Brown, contains the statement that the defendant objected to certain parts of the statement of the Avitness, and moved to exclude the statement. … The cases (Kenedy v. State, 140 Ala. 1 , 37 South. 90 ; Fantroy v. State, 166 Ala. 27 , 51 South. 931 ; Trammell v. State, 1 Ala.

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Dixie Auto Insurance

292 F. Supp. 554 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Feb 16, 1968

Brown, Mrs. W. H. Brown, Earl Rolland and Janice F. Rolland (hereinafter called claimants) against Jerald McMurrey, Yernie B. McMurrey, and O. Z. … Brown, Mrs. W. H. Brown, Earl Rolland and Janice F.

MacLean v. Moon

567 So. 2d 349 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · May 16, 1990

The basic facts are as follows: Appellant applied to the Jefferson County Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) for a variance to maintain a house trailer on his property, which was zoned R-1 and did not allow for the maintenance … Bennett v. Bennett , 454 So.2d 535 (Ala. 1984). AFFIRMED. INGRAM, P.J., concurs. RUSSELL, J., concurs in result only.

Robinson v. State

53 Ala. App. 145 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jun 25, 1974

There were two light brown hairs removed also from the panties. These hairs revealed characteristics common to • a light-brown Caucasian hair. And that’s all that was removed.” … White v. State, 37 Ala.App. 448 , 70 So.2d 287 . The clothing worn by the prosecutrix at the time of the alleged rape was properly received in evidence. Chancellor v. State, 38 Ala.App. 89 , 80 So.2d 313 ; Cox v.

Day v. Andrews

279 Ala. 563 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 16, 1966

Wright v. Cook, 216 Ala. 270 , 113 So. 252 . … Ellis v. Womack, 247 Ala. 254 , 23 So.2d 859 . We have written to all points sufficiently argued in appellant's brief to invite our attention. This judgment is due to be affirmed. Affirmed. LIVINGSTON, C.

State Health Plan. v. Baptist Health System

766 So. 2d 176 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Mar 31, 2000

The hearing officer's decision is the final decision of the SHPDA Board. § 22-21-275 (14); Methodist Homes for the Aging Corp. v. Stewart , 594 So.2d 161 (Ala.Civ.App. 1992). … This court reviews the circuit court's ruling with no presumption of correctness, "since that court was in no better position to review the order of the Board than we are." State Health Planning Resource Dev. Admin. v.