Case law

Vance S. Harrington & Co. v. Renner

236 N.C. 321 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1952

Kinney v. Sutton, 230 N.C. 404 , 53 S.E. 2d 306 ; Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E. 2d 128 ; In re Appeal of Parker, 214 N.C. 51 , 197 S.E. 706 ; Elizabeth City v. … County, and that tbe Board of Commissioners shall act as a board of adjustment.

Sides v. Cabarrus Memorial Hospital, Inc.

287 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 1975

Upon the first meeting of the Board of Trustees . . . the said Board shall appoint an executive committee composed of seven members from the trustees, all residents of the county. . . . “Sec. 6. . . . … Accord, Faizan v.

Gaskill v. Costlow

270 N.C. 686 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1967

Lamb v. Board of Education, 235 N.C. 377 , 70 S.E. 2d 201 ; Idol v. Street, 233 N.C. 730 , 65 S.E. 2d 313 ; Board of Health v. Comrs. of Nash, 220 N.C. 140 , 16 S.E. 2d 677 ; Sams v. … Leavell v. Town of Texico, supra, is cited with approval in City and County of Denver v. Board of County Comr’s., 141 Colo. 102 , 347 P. 2d 132 . The statute under consideration in Hite v.

Jenkins v. City Coach Co.

231 N.C. 208 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 30, 1949

Brown v. Truck Lines, 229 N.C. 122 , 47 S.E. 2d 711 . Moreover, it compels the conclusion that he was keeping a vigilant lookout for vehicles approaching from the opposite direction. … He has the right to assume under such circumstances that the approaching automobile will remain on its own side of the road until the vehicles meet and pass in safety, Brown v.

SANDHILL AMUSEMENTS, INC. v. State

365 N.C. 333 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 25, 2011

.; and Old North State Amusements, Inc. v. … Browning, Smithfield, for State of N.C, et al. Kelly Daughtry, for Sandhill Amusements, Inc., et al.

Wade v. City of Newbern

77 N.C. 460 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1877

This case was subsequently affirmed upon the same point in Simms v. Killian, 12 Ire. 252, and in Mizell v. Burnett, 4 Jones, 249 . … In Laythroop v. Bryant, 2 Bing. N. C. 744, which was cited in Rice v Garter, the defendant had signed a written contract to convey land.

N. C. Railroad v. Swepson

71 N.C. 350 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

Mendenhall himself at first declined to carry it out without consulting the Board. … The same is laid down in State v. Lane, 4 Ired., 431 . A different rule prevails in .public agencies where a majority may act. Id.

Spoon v. Spoon

233 N.C. App. 38 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 2014

As such, Defendant, citing Tucker v. … Evans v. Evans, 138 N.C. App. 135, 140, 530 S.E.2d 576, 579 (2000); see Harrington v. Harrington, 16 N.C.

In re: Lowe's Home Ctrs.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 2020

Lowe’s concludes, “[g]iven that the Board did not even discuss Section 105-287 or the Union County [S]chedule of [V]alues, the Commission properly concluded that the Board did not intend to ‘correct an appraisal error … resulting from a misapplication’ of the [S]chedule of [V]alues” at the time of the 2017 Revaluation.

In re the Petition of Central Telephone Company Concerning the Allocation Formula for Corporate Income Tax Purposes for the Year Ended December 31, 1991

167 N.C. App. 14 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 16, 2004

Duke v. … In Coca-Cola Co. v.

McLaughlin v. Hope Manufacturing Co.

103 N.C. 100 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1889

In State v. … See Collins v.

State v. Parrish

254 N.C. 301 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1961

Surety Corp. v. Sharpe, 232 N.C. 98, 103 , 59 S.E. 2d 593 . … The Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518 , 4 L. Ed. 629 .” Eason v. Spence, 232 N.C. 579, 584 , 61 S.E. 2d 717 .

Jacobs v. City of Asheville

137 N.C. App. 441 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 2000

Russ v. Board of Education, 232 N.C. 128, 130 , 59 S.E.2d 589, 591 (1950) (citations omitted) (emphasis in original). … Russ v. Board of Education, 232 N.C. at 130 , 59 S.E.2d at 591 .

Lynch v. Lynch

74 N.C. App. 540 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 1985

Overton v. Overton, supra (quoting Ledford v. Ledford, 229 N.C. 373 , 49 S.E. 2d 794 (1948)); Howard v. Boyce, supra. … Overton v. Overton, supra and Howard v. Boyce, supra.

The Estate of Nathan Richard Coppick v. Hobbs Marina Properties, LLC

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 2015

Stat. § 87- 10(b) (2013) (“Application for license [for General Contractors]” “(b) The Board shall conduct an examination . . . of all applicants for license to ascertain . . . … As defendant concedes, our Supreme Court previously addressed this issue in Brown v. Flowe, 349 N.C. 520, 507 S.E.2d 894 (1998).

TOWN OF MATTHEWS v. Wright

194 N.C. App. 552 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 16, 2008

Roten v. Critcher, 135 N.C. App. 469, 472 , 521 S.E.2d 140, 143 (1999) (internal citations omitted). … In Chowan County v.

Grassy Creek Neighborhood Alliance, Inc. v. City of Winston-Salem

142 N.C. App. 290 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 20, 2001

Davis v. N.C. Granite, 259 N.C. 672, 675 , 131 S.E.2d 335, 337 (1963). … Davis, supra; Patrick v. Beatty, 202 N.C. 454 , 163 S.E.2d 572 (1932).

Kee v. . Dillingham

229 N.C. 262 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 29, 1948

. *266 Fields v. Brown, 160 N. C., 295 , 76 S. E., 8 . The rule is well stated in 9 Am. … E. (2d), 484 ; Yarn Co. v. Mauney, 228 N. C., 99 , 44 S. E. (2d), 601 ; McNeill v. McNeill, 223 N. C., 178 (182), 25 S. E. (2d), 615 ; Spencer v. Brown, 214 N. C., 114 , 198 S.

Plyler v. . Elliott

191 N.C. 54 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 1926

In Town of Cornelius v. Lampton, 189 N. … At p. 262, it is said: “A boarding house might be conducted by the contractor (like some company stores concerning which states have legislated —Koekee Consol. Coke Co. v. Taylor, 234 U. S., 224 , 58 L.

Hammond v. City of Charlotte

205 N.C. 469 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1933

The power of the board of aldermen of the city of Charlotte to levy an annual tax for the maintenance of public schools in the city as well as that of the board of school commissioners to employ teachers and fix their salaries … Bramham v. Durham, 171 N. C., 196 ; Rankin v. Gaston Co., 173 N. C., 683 ; Wilson v. Comrs., 183 N. C., 638 ; Monteith v. Comrs., 195 N. C., 71 .