Case law

Isenhart v. Brown

1 Edw. Ch. 411 · New York Court of Chancery · Oct 9, 1832

In Blower v. Morret, 2 Ves. … In Loocock v.

Boechat v. Brown

9 A.D. 369 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1896

State v. Brown

26 Del. 499 · New York Court of General Session of the Peace · Oct 25, 1912

State v. Tindal, 5 Harr. 488 (1854); State v. Friedman, 3 Penn. 403 ; State v. Hartnett, 7 Penn. 204; State v. … Brown, 121 Mass. 69 ; Watson v. State, 9 Tex. App. 237; Frazer v. People, 54 Barb. (N. Y.) 306; Commonwealth v. Wood, 11 Gray (Mass.) 85 ; Commonwealth v.

Hough v. . Brown

19 N.Y. 111 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1859

BROWN, Esq., Buffalo: "We accept of your proposition for our entire freight from Chicago to New York and Boston. We include some nine or ten thousand hides. … You will acknowledge the acceptance of the above, and direct your communication to Andrew Brown, Monson, Mass. "ANDREW BROWN Co., "R.M. O.S. HOUGH."

Tuckerman v. . Brown

33 N.Y. 297 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 1865

In Brown, Receiver, v. Appleby (1 Sandf. S. … C., 629), it was held that a note of that description cannot be given up to the maker without consid *308 oration, even by the board of trustees of the company, and if so given up, a receiver of the company’s effects may

Brown v. Powers

53 A.D. 251 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1900

(Sheridan v. Mayor, 68 N. Y. 30 ; Hays v. Hathorn, 74 id. 486 ; Considerant v. Bris bane, 22 id. 389 ; Cummings v. Morris, 25 id. 625.) The Sheridan case is directly in point.

Brown v. Goord

9 A.D.3d 646 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 8, 2004

The misbehavior reports, as well as the videotape of the incident, provide substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt (see Matter of Morales v Goord, 290 AD2d 790, 791 [2002]; Matter of Green v Selsky, 284 AD2d 617, 618 [ … 986, 987 [2003]; Matter of Morales v Goord, supra at 791).

Brown v. . Robinson

224 N.Y. 301 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1918

(Matthews v. Coe, 70 N. Y. 239 ; White v. Benjamin, 138 id. 623, 624.) … (White v. Benjamin, supra; Matthews v. Coe, supra.)

Mandle v. Brown

5 N.Y.2d 51 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1958

Matter of Golden v. Joseph, 307 N. Y. 62 ). … Y. 33 ; Matter of Crosby v. Board of Educ., 187 App. Div. 205, 209-210 , affd. 226 N. Y. 705 ; People ex rel. Stokes v. Tully, 108 App. Div. 345, 351 ). Matter of Williams v. Morton (supra) is not to the contrary.

People v. Brown

9 Misc. 3d 420 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 14, 2005

She testified that in her opinion, from comparing the two profiles, the defendant, Michael Brown, was the source of the male DNA from the sexual assault kit sent to Bode Technology. … (People v Diaz, 21 AD3d at 64 .)

Holland v. . Brown

140 N.Y. 344 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1893

(Cook v. Travis, 20 N. Y. 400 : Brown v. Valkenburg, 64 id. 76: Pope v. Allen, 90 id. 298.) … (Trustees, etc., Town of East Hampton v. Kirk, 84 N. Y. 220 ; Jackson v. Halstead, 5 Cowen, 216; Baker v. Van Valkenburgh, 29 Barb. 319 .)

Wright v. . Brown

67 N.Y. 1 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 1876

As was said in the People v. The Superior Court of New York, “there is no standard by which the weight of conflicting evidence can be ascertained.

Brown v. Rickets

4 Johns. Ch. 303 · New York Court of Chancery · Jan 27, 1820

I have had occasion frequently to lay down this rule; (Dunscomb v. Dunscomb, Manning v. Manning, and Schiefflin v. Stewart, 1 Johns. Ch. … In Newton v.

Manning v. Brown

91 N.Y.2d 116 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1997

Her injuries were the direct result of her knowing participation in joyriding (see, Barker v Kallash, supra, 63 NY2d, at 25, 32 ; cf., Humphrey v State of New York, 60 NY2d 742, 744 ). … Amidon also testified that she found the keys under a set of papers out of plain view and therefore plaintiffs claim that the Browns violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1210 (a) 2 is likewise without merit (see, Banellis v

People v. Brown

187 A.D.3d 1604 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 2, 2020

People v Brown ( 2020 NY Slip Op 05427 ) People v Brown 2020 NY Slip Op 05427 Decided on October 2, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … MOTION NO. (276/18) KA 12-01620. [*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v EUGENE S. BROWN, ALSO KNOWN AS EUGENE NESMITH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Posson v. Brown

11 Johns. 166 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1814

As the judgment obtained before the other justice, (Hoes,) in favour of Posson against Brown, was given in evidence, it is most probable that the present suit was brought to recover back the money recovered of the plaintiff

Brown v. Hinchman

9 Johns. 75 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1812

Welty v. Brown

57 A.D.2d 1000 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 12, 1977

This court will not disturb such a determination unless it is not reasonably grounded (Kielman v Enterprise Stores, 38 AD2d 629 ). … This court has, on occasion, awarded new trials unless the defendant agreed to stipulate to increase the verdict (Rivera v Presbyterian Hosp., 55 AD2d 998 ; Bonder v Berman, 43 AD2d 653 ).

People v. Brown

66 A.D.2d 223 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 8, 1979

Dennis, 537 SW2d 652 [Mo]; Lillard v State, 528 SW2d 207 [Tenn]; Mikell v State, 242 Ala 298), and in our view the criminal transaction here, as outlined above, requires a similar conclusion. … Tanner, 30 NY2d 102 [robbery and murder]; People v McMillan, 61 AD2d 800 [burglary and rape]).

Brown v. Weinreb

183 A.D.2d 562 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 19, 1992

(See, Torpey v Sanders, 248 App Div 303, 305 .) Nor can liability be imposed on defendants for their failure to provide other safeguards to prevent injury.