Case law

Cheeks v. Fort Myer Construction Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 25, 2010

Steel Co. v. … Election Comm’n v.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Presto Manufacturing Company, Intervenor. Presto Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board

417 F.2d 1144 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 12, 1970

417 F.2d 1144 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Presto Manufacturing Company, Intervenor. PRESTO MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner. v. … We * * * [found] their use unobjectionable and within the competence of the Board." United Steelworkers of America v. NLRB, 129 U.S.

Wagman v. Lee

457 A.2d 401 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1983

Although punitive damages generally are not recoverable for breach of contract, e.g., Brown v. Coates, 102 U.S. … As the Circuit Court of Appeals said in Brown v. Coates, supra, 102 U.S.

Lee v. Brady

741 F. Supp. 990 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 1990

v. … See Mitchell v. Secretary of Commerce, 715 F.Supp. 409 (D.D.C.1989); Brown v. Marsh, supra, 713 F.Supp. 20 . Even in Brown v.

Pyrocap International Corp. v. Ford Motor Co.

259 F. Supp. 2d 92 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2003

See Claasen v. … See Claasen v, Brown, 15 A.D.D. 443, 1996 WL 79490 , * 6.

Flores v. Glover House

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 13, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (cleaned up). Thus, the pleader must allege enough facts to permit a court “to infer more than the mere possibility of misconduct.” Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Hazen v. National Rifle Ass'n of America

101 F.2d 432 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 5, 1938

Maxwell Land Grant Co., 139 U.S. 569, 577, 578 , 11 *435 S.Ct. 656, 35 L.Ed. 278 ; Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 213 U.S. 25, 43 , 29 S.Ct. 404 , 53 L.Ed. 682 ; Interstate Commerce Comm. v. … Snyder, 29 Wyo. 199 , 212 P. 771 ; Carteret Academy v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 102 N.J.L. 525 , 133 A. 886 ; Beta XI Chap *437 ter v.

Tierney v. Tierney

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2023

Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M St. LLC, 257 F. … Co. v.

Stoddard v. Carlin

799 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 2011

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … See, e.g., Bettencourt v. Bd. of Registration in Med., 904 F.2d 772, 782 (1st Cir.1990) (quasi-judicial absolute immunity was proper for medical licensing board members); Ashbrook v.

In Re Cummings

466 A.2d 1224 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1983

Moreover, respondent will receive a more thorough hearing before the Board and its hearing committee. His due process rights are thus protected. See Burleigh v. State Bar of Nevada, 98 Nev. 140 , 643 P.2d 1201 (1982). … Board.

Buckingham v. Mabus

772 F. Supp. 2d 295 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2011

See Kreis v. … See Frizelle v. Slater, 111 F.3d at 176-78 ; Mudd v. Caldera, 26 F.Supp.2d at 120 . B.

Byrum v. Winter

783 F. Supp. 2d 117 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 10, 2011

Bois v. … Lujan v.

Green Leaves Restaurant, Inc. v. 617 H Street Associates

974 A.2d 222 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2009

Truitt v. … See, e.g., Brown v.

Quezada v. Marshall

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 2013

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Such motions allege that a plaintiff has not properly stated a claim; they do not test a plaintiff’s ultimate likelihood of success on the merits. Scheuer v. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242.

David D. Travers v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 2015

State Bar v. Attorney-Respondent, 367 So. 2d 179, 185 (Miss. 1979); In re Baun, 232 N.W.2d 621, 624-25 (Mich. 1975); cf. Littlejohn v. … United States v.

Farmer v. Hawk-Sawyer

69 F. Supp. 2d 120 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 1999

Brown, M.D., a board-certified psychiatrist, who is Professor of Psychiatry and Chairman of the Department of Psychiatry at East Tennessee State University. Deck of Brown at 1. … See Rafferty v.

Matter of Keiler

380 A.2d 119 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1977

Justice Frankfurter said in Schware v. … See Parker v.

In Re Bell

716 A.2d 205 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 1998

Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Bell, 343 Md. 619 , 683 A.2d 783 (1996). The Board now recommends that reciprocal discipline be imposed on each respondent, and neither of them objects. … In the absence of any objection, we accept the Board’s recommendation. See D.C.

Industrial Workers of the World, Etc. v. Ramsey Clark, Attorney General of the United States

385 F.2d 687 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 26, 1967

Naples v. United States, 123 U.S.App. D.C. 292, 359 F.2d 276 (1966). . See e. g., Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967) ; Elfbrandt v. … Russell, 384 U.S. 11 , 86 S.Ct. 1238 , 16 L.Ed.2d 321 (1966) ; United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437 , 85 S.Ct. 1707 , 14 L.Ed.2d 484 (1965) ; Aptheker v.

In Re Mance

980 A.2d 1196 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 2009

Special Counsel for Discipline v. … Smith v.