Case law

Rogers v. . Clements

92 N.C. 81 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1885

This declaration was admitted to show non-payment by that obligor, it being necessary to prove non-payment by both in order to remove the presumption as to each under the ruling in Campbell v. Brown, 86 N. … The separate acknowledgment of one debtor *86 that he has not paid the debt is insufficient to charge him even, unless it is also shown that none of the others had made payment In Campbell v. Brown, 86 N.

Miller v. . London

60 N.C. 628 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1864

See, among other cases, Lea v. Brown , 56 N.C. 141 . The residuary clause in favor of the testator's wife is shown, by the same case of Lea v. … Kirkpatrick v. Rogers , 42 N.C. 44 ; Swann v. Swann , 58 N.C. 299 .

Duncan v. City of Charlotte

234 N.C. 86 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 17, 1951

Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N.C. 766 , 32 S.E. 2d 320 ; Wilson v. Mooresville, 222 N.C. 283 , 22 S.E. 2d 907 ; Neely v. Statesville, 212 N.C. 365 , 193 S.E. 664 ; and Rewis v. Ins. … Ferguson, 202 N.C. 446 , 163 S.E. 688 ; Edgerton v. Hood, Comr. of Banks, 205 N.C. 816 , 172 S.E. 481 ; S. v. Sasseen, 206 N.C. 644 , 175 S.E. 142 ; Brown v. Comrs. of Richmond County, 223 N.C. 744 , 28 S.E. 2d 104 .

J.O.C. Farms, LLC. v. Rural Community Insurance Agency, Inc.

131 F. Supp. 3d 514 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 17, 2015

Id. at 252 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 ; see Beale v. … Coal. v. Hurst, 604 F.Supp.2d 860, 879 (S.D.W.Va.2009) (quotation omitted); see Defenders of Wildlife v. N.C. Dep’t of Transp., 762 F.3d 374, 392-93 (4th Cir.2014); Occidental Eng’g Co. v.

Central Telephone Co. v. Tolson

174 N.C. App. 554 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 15, 2005

It is a “well-settled rule that a statute’s constitutionality shall be determined by the judiciary, not an administrative board.” Meads v. … Bailey v. State, 330 N.C. 227, 235 , 412 S.E.2d 295, 300 (1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 911 , 118 L. Ed. 2d 547 (1992), overruled in part on other grounds by Bailey v.

Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Mecklenburg County

181 N.C. 386 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 18, 1921

Comrs. v. Boring, 175 N. C., 105 ; Lowery v. School Trustees, 140 N. C., 33 ; Cotton Mills v. Waxhaw, 130 N. C., 293 ; Berry v. Haines, 4 N. … S. v. Stokes, at present term, citing S. v. Burnett, 179 N. C., 735 ; Smith v. Wilkins, 164 N. C., 136 ; Efland v. R. R., 146 N. C., 135 ; Ins. Co. v. Daggs, 172 U. S., 557 ; Tullis v. R. R., 175 U. S., 348 -353.

Ford v. Jurgens

2021 NCBC 7 · North Carolina Business Court · Feb 2, 2021

Ford v. Jurgens, 2021 NCBC 7. … Co. v. Pennington, 356 N.C. 571, 579, 573 S.E.2d 118, 124 (2002) (citation omitted).

Kee v. . Dillingham

229 N.C. 262 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 29, 1948

. *266 Fields v. Brown, 160 N. C., 295 , 76 S. E., 8 . The rule is well stated in 9 Am. … E. (2d), 484 ; Yarn Co. v. Mauney, 228 N. C., 99 , 44 S. E. (2d), 601 ; McNeill v. McNeill, 223 N. C., 178 (182), 25 S. E. (2d), 615 ; Spencer v. Brown, 214 N. C., 114 , 198 S.

In Re Will of Gilkey

256 N.C. 415 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1962

(N.S.) 842; In re Sheppard’s Will, 128 N.C. 54 ; Alston v. Davis, 118 N.C. 202 ; Winstead v. Bowman, 68 N.C. 170 ; Hughes v. Smith, 64 N.C. 493 ; Hill v. Bell, 61 N.C. 122 ; Simms v. Simms, 27 N.C. 684 . … Neither Little v. Lockman, 49 N.C. 494 , nor Adams v. Clark, 53 N.C. 56 , relied upon by caveator, support her contention. In Little v.

Hall v. . Commissioners of Duplin

195 N.C. 367 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 28, 1928

Thereafter, on 10 January, 1928, an affidavit was filed by the members of the board of education and the county superintendent to the effect that on 9 May, 1927, the board of education requested the board of commissioners … Lovelace v. Pratt, 187 N. C., 686 ; Frazier v. Commissioners, 194 N. C., 49 ; Owens v. Wake County, ante, 132. The purpose for which the bonds are issued must be stated and set forth in the bond resolution itself.

Mayo v. North Carolina State University

168 N.C. App. 503 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 15, 2005

Capital Outdoor, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of Adjustment, 152 N.C. App. 474, 475 , 567 S.E.2d 440, 441 (2002). … State University Board of Trustees.”

State v. Kinston Charter Acad.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 17, 2021

STATE V. … McDonald- Hall, both individually and as the Chair of the Academy’s Board. In its complaint,  STATE V.

Griffith v. Piedmont Natural Gas

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 9, 1996

Brown of Hickory, North Carolina. Dr. Brown first saw plaintiff while he was hospitalized at Frye Regional Medical Center in late August of 1992. … Stat. 97-32 ; Seagroves v. Austin Co. of Greensboro , 123 N.C. App. 228 , 472 S.E.2d 397 (1996). 3.

Baker v. Town of Rose Hill

126 N.C. App. 338 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 20, 1997

Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 626 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 383 , rehearing denied, 300 N.C. 562 , 270 S.E.2d 106 (1980). … CG & T Corp. v. Bd. of Adjustment of Wilmington, 105 N.C. App. 32, 40 , 411 S.E.2d 655, 660 (1992).

Parks v. . Commissioners

186 N.C. 490 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1923

McIntire v. R. R. , 67 N.C. 278 . See S. v. Lyle , 100 N.C. 503 ; R. R. v. McCaskill , 94 N.C. 746 ; Allen v. R. R. , 102 N.C. 381 . … Greenville , 154 N.C. 490 ; Rosenthal v. Goldsboro , 149 N.C. 128 ; Small v. Edenton , 146 N.C. 527 ; Ward v. Comrs. , 146 N.C. 534 ; Durham v. Rigsbee , 141 N.C. 128 ; Tate v. Greensboro , 114 N.C. 392 ; Brodnax v.

State v. Walker

662 S.E.2d 392 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 2008

662 S.E.2d 392 (2008) STATE of North Carolina v. Jason Christopher WALKER and Emit E. Browning, Jr. and Javier A. Hernandez, Jr. No. 16P05-3. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 10, 2008. Robert C. … Brian Michael Aus, Durham, for Browning. Daniel L. Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Walker. Geoffrey W. Hosford, Wilmington, for Hernandez. Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 654 S.E.2d 722 .

Bratcher v. Winters

269 N.C. 636 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1967

Buss v. Board of Education, 232 N.C. 128 , 59 S.E. 2d 589 (citing approximately 30 cases). … The Board conducted the hearing but failed to provide any record except the very sketchy notes of the Board’s Secretary.

Howard v. Boyce

254 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1961

Chavis v. Brown, 174 N.C. 122 , 93 S.E. 471 . … Chavis v. Brown, supra; Hatcher v. Faison, supra. A jury trial is not allowed as a matter of right, and a jury verdict would only be advisory in character. Chavis v. Brown, supra; Cleve v.

Mangum v. Durham Loan & Trust Co.

195 N.C. 469 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1928

Patterson v. McCormick, 181 N. C., 311 ; Pilley v. Sullivan, 182 N. C., 493 ; Walker v. Trollinger, 192 N. C., 744 ; Williams v. Best, ante, 324; Brown v. Brown, ante, 315. … See Powell v. Wood, 149 N. C., p. 235; Austin v. Austin, 160 N. C., 367 ; Kidder v. Bailey, 187 N. C., 505 .

Rayfield v. Clark

283 N.C. 362 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 1973

Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153 , 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971). … Brown v. Brown, 264 N.C. 485, 488 , 141 S.E. 2d 875, 877 (1965).