Case law

State v. Raedeker

158 Okla. 248 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1932

Our attention has been called to Myers et al. v. … board. True the evidence shows the conversation with .Thatcher was in the room where the commissioners were Jin session, but no contract was made by the board and no record was made. J. L.

Tri-State Casualty Ins. Co. v. LaFON

205 Okla. 293 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1951

Later, a similar question arose in Provenzano v. … This court had, in 1932, some fourteen years prior to that time, in Ponca City Board of Education v.

Oklahoma Turnpike Auth. v. DIST. COURT OF LINCOLN CTY.

203 Okla. 330 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1950

Board of County Commissioners of Marshall Co. v. Shaw, 199 Okla. 66 , 182 P. 2d 507 . And in such case jurisdiction to hear and determine the questions presented is properly conferred. … & Resources Board, 201 Okla. 178 , 203 P. 2d 415 .

Bell v. Great Lakes Container Corp.

702 P.2d 387 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1985

In Dana Corp. v. Appeal Board of Michigan Employment Security Commission, 371 Mich. 107 , 123 N.W.2d 277, 278 (1963), the court there stated: [0]nce stipulations have been received and approved they are sacrosanct. … See Welsh v. Brown-Graves Lumber Co., 58 Ohio App.2d 49 , 389 N.E.2d 514 (1978). 4 . See Stephens v.

Opinion No. 68-281 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1968

The Board may then adopt the proposed regulations or refer them both to the Commission for further consideration." … Symonds v. Bucklin, Maryland, 197 F. Supp. 682 . Windsor v. Whitby, 95 Conn. 357 , 111 A. 354 ., 12 A.L.R. 669 .

Adkins v. Investors Syndicate

175 Okla. 557 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1935

The rule laid down in Francen v. … In Barnhart v.

Salyer v. Jackson

105 Okla. 212 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 30, 1924

In Mean v. Callison, 28 Okla. … The powers of the board of county commissioners, delegated by Comp. Stat. 1921, sec. 5793, are to be exercised by the board in regular, adjourned or special sessions.

Opinion No. 73-129 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1973

In Pierce v. … The Supreme Court of Kansas considered a similar question in Crevhon, et al. v. Board of Education of City of Parsons, 163 P. 145 .

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 9, 1999

See, e.g., City of Birmingham v. Hawkins, 94 So. 62 , 65 (Ala. 1922); Nichols v. Galveston County, 228 S.W. 547 , 548 (Tex. 1921); and Chemical Bank Trust Co. v. Oakland County, 251 N.W. 395 , 400 (Mich. 1933). … See Oklahoma State Election Board v. Coats, 610 P.2d 776 , 778-79 (Okla. 1980).

Ray v. Stevenson

71 Okla. Crim. 339 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1941

extent as if the new members as such board had made the contract and no further.” *351 See, also, Warner v. … City of Guymon, 176 Okla. 419 , 55 P. 2d 969 ; Board of Education of City of Bartlesville v. Schmidt, 111 Okla. 277 , 239 P. 580 ; State v. Sowards, 64 Okla. Cr. 430 , 82 P. 2d 324 .

Appeal of Moore

492 P.2d 1091 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1972

Petitioner relies primarily upon the principles applied in Board of County Commissioners v. Litton, Okl., 315 P.2d 239 (1957). … Firemen’s Relief and Pension Board v. Ozment, Okl., 467 P.2d 502 (1970), we held that this and similar provisions indicated a specific legislative intent to allow retired firemen to be re-employed.

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

157 Okla. 131 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1932

Bowling v. Merry, 91 Okla. 176 , 217 P. 404 ; Hawkins v. Bryan, 128 Okla. 27 , 261 P. 167 ; Orth v. Hajek, 127 Okla. 50 ; 259 P. 854 ; Greer v. McNeal, 11 Okla. 519 , 69 P. 891 ; Hocker v. … We-held in a recent case, No. 21386, County Excise Board of Creek County v.

CAPRON v. SIXSMITH

2023 OK CIV APP 25 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 2023

Johnson v. Snow , , ¶8, . "Under this standard, we have plenary, independent, and nondeferential authority to determine whether the trial court erred in its legal ruling." Fanning v. Brown , , ¶8, . … Fairlawn Cemetery Ass'n v. First Presbyterian Church , ¶14, . Permission to enter another's property may be either express or implied. Brown v. Nicholson , , ¶6, .

Dobry v. Dobry Flour Mills, Inc.

270 P.2d 317 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1954

As a result of this dis-^ cussion a special meeting of the board of directors was held on December 18, 1947, at which time the board voted to give the plaintiff a salary allowance of $300 per month which was to begin November … J., JOHNSON, V. €. J.’ and HORN, DAVISON, O’NEAL, WILLIAMS and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur. ■

Southern Corrections Systems Inc. v. Union City Public Schools

73 O.B.A.J. 3571 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 2002

Independent *1091 School District No. 1 v. Howard, 1959 OK 17, ¶ 7 , 336 P.2d 1097 ; Consolidated School Dist. No. 6 v. Panther Oil & Grease Mfg. Co., 1946 OK 137, ¶ 4 , 168 P.2d 613 ; Board of Education of School Dist. … Robinson, 1929 OK 427, ¶ 9 , 282 P. 299 [county superintendent]; Board of Education v. McAchran, 1928 OK 414, ¶ 3 , 271 P. 843 [teacher’s salary]; Board of Education of School Dist. 47 ½ v.

Opinion No. 78-118 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 15, 1978

No Board, commission, department, program or office whose expenditure of funds for salaries and wages has been limited by legislative action shall exceed the amount unless approval is first granted by the Board." … However, to read the above subsection as authority for powers not specifically enumerated in Section 3603 would be contrary to a basic rule of statutory construction found in American First Title and Trust Company v.

Gentry-Bowers Lumber Co. v. Hamill

75 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1919

Lee v. Tonsor, 62 Oklahoma, 161 Pac. 805 ; Clark v. Hall, 10 Kan. 81 . … Co. v. Sayre, 72 Oklahoma, 178 Pac. 671 ; Stetson-Post Mill Co. v. Brown, 21 Wash. 619 , 59 Pac. 507 , 75 Am. St. Rep. 862 .

Cooper v. State

552 P.2d 406 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 9, 1976

Brown, 10 Cir., 456 F.2d 18 . This Court has previously held that the decision in Lamb v. … Brown, supra, did not serve to hold as unconstitutional the otherwise valid laws in existence under our Juvenile Code prior to April 4, 1972. In Dean v.

Oklahoma Association of Insurance Agents v. Hudson

385 P.2d 453 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 24, 1963

In Tinker v. … P. v. Kutscher, 179 Ill. 340 , *456 53 N.E. 620 ; Supreme Conclave, I. O. H. v. Rehan, 119 Md. 92 , 85 A. 1035 , 46 L. R.A.,N.S. 308.

SAVE THE ILLINOIS RIVER, INC. v. STATE ex. rel. OKLA. STATE ELECTION BD.

2016 OK 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 8, 2016

v. … STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL LICENSURE Cited 1946 OK 171, 170 P.2d 208, 197 Okla. 291, HARDING v. STATE ELECTION BD. Discussed 1960 OK 245, 357 P.2d 421, WICKERSHAM v.