Case law

Brier v. Orenberg

90 A.2d 832 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 1952

Creighton v. Brown, D.C.Mun.App., 77 A.2d 559 ; Restatement, Contracts, § 250 (1932). When the settlement date arrived and1 the assignment had not been obtained buyer was clearly within his rights in refusing to settle. … Creighton v. Brown, supra; Restatement, Contracts §§ 395, 250(a), 257 (1932); 3 Williston, Contracts, § 633 et seq., § 1970 (Revised ed. 1936). Reversed. 1 .

Hornsby v. Federal Housing Finance Agency

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 2025

Miles v. … The Board did not err by denying relief on that basis. V.

Dano Resource Recovery, Inc. v. District of Columbia

566 A.2d 483 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1989

Contract Appeals Board in September 1983. … See Cox v. Jenkins, 878 F.2d 414, 419-20 (D.C.Cir.1989); C Street Tenants Association, supra, 552 A.2d at 526 ; cf. Walker v.

Aubin v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 5, 2015

Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). In all events, the municipality’s liability can be predicated "only [upon] acts for which the municipality itselfis actually responsible.” City ofSt. Louis v. … Id; see also Allen v.

Coombs v. United States

399 A.2d 1313 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1979

Brown v. United States, 134 U.S.App.D.C. 269 , 414 F.2d 1165 (1969). … It was therefore error to give the missing witness instruction. 9 See Brown v. United States, supra, 134 U.S.App.D.C. at 271-72 , 414 F.2d at 1167-68 ; Wynn v.

Xilojitzep v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 25, 2025

Campaign Legal Ctr. v. Fed. Election Comm’n, No. 5 22-cv-3319 (CRC), 2024 WL 4263853, at *5 (D.D.C. Sept. 23, 2024) (citing Browning v. … Brown v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co., 254 F.3d 654, 658 (7th Cir. 2001).

Sturm v. United States Department of Defense

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2025

United States. v. L.A. … ”); Roberts v.

Calloway v. Harvey

590 F. Supp. 2d 29 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 4, 2008

Judicial review of the final decision of the Army Board is limited to a determination of whether the board’s decision “is arbitrary and capricious, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial evidence.” Frizelle v. … Corp. v.

United States v. Clipper

758 F. Supp. 756 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 1991

In United States v. … The informant supplied a brief description of Draper and predicted he would be wearing a light-colored raincoat, brown slacks and brown shoes and would be walking “real fast.”

In Re Hirschfeld

622 A.2d 688 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1993

See United States v. Hirschfeld, 964 F.2d 318 (4th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1067 , 122 L.Ed.2d 371 (1993), rehearing denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1437 , 122 L.Ed.2d 803 (1993). … As for what should happen next, the Board proposes two alternatives. The Board could continue to follow the procedure it used in this case.

Matter of Lieber

442 A.2d 153 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1982

The Board recommends that Lieber be suspended for a period of six months. … See Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 73 , 53 S.Ct. 55, 65 , 77 L.Ed. 158 (1932); 7A C.J.S. Attorney and Client § 137 (1980).

Stephen Taylor v. Michael Huerta

723 F.3d 210 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 2013

Transportation Safety Board Timothy V. … in Cooper v.

Matter of Austern

524 A.2d 680 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1987

497 A.2d 1062 (D.C. 1985) (holding that respondent’s submission of false information in resume sent to prospective employer violated DR1-102(A)(4) and warranted public censure); Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. … The Board therefore assumed, as we do, that the Hearing Committee intended to recommend a reprimand by the Board. 9 .

Tansey v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc.

97 F. Supp. 458 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 3, 1950

Nabors v. Texas Co., D.C.W.D.La., 32 F.Supp. 91 . … Co. v. Grant, 234 Ky. 276, 285 , 27 S.W.2d 980 ; Gourley v. Chicago, etc. R. Co., 295 IIl.App. 160, 14 N.E.2d 842 .

Georgetown University Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

916 A.2d 149 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 2007

Discussion In a workers’ compensation case, we review the decision of the Board, not that of the ALJ. Providence Hosp. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 855 A.2d 1108, 1111 (D.C.2004). … Here the compensation order reflects enough confusion that we cannot say the Board’s decision to affirm was supported by substantial evidence. See Mayo v.

Chandler v. Bernanke

531 F. Supp. 2d 193 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 2008

Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“The Board”). Ms. … Sullivan-Obst v. Powell, 300 F.Supp.2d 85, 99 (D.D.C.2004)(citing Gardner v. United States, 1999 WL 164412 , at *7 (D.D.C. Jan. 29, 1999)); accord Russell v.

Pyrocap International Corp. v. Ford Motor Co.

259 F. Supp. 2d 92 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2003

See Claasen v. … See Claasen v, Brown, 15 A.D.D. 443, 1996 WL 79490 , * 6.

In Re Confidential (J.E.S.)

670 A.2d 1343 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1996

Inst. of Architects v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 594 A.2d 83, 87 (D.C.1991)). … Specifically, he cites: Phillips v. Joyce, 169 Ill.App.3d 520 , 120 Ill.Dec. 22, 28 , 523 N.E.2d 933, 939 (1988); In re Ziemann, 214 Ill.App.3d 988 , 158 Ill.Dec. 654 , 574 N.E.2d 767 (1991); and Holstein v.

In re Villareal

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 17, 2025

The Board concluded that Mr. … In In re Dobbie, the respondents were charged with disciplinary violations for failing to turn over exculpatory information to the defense in violation of the requirements of Brady v.

Kittner v. Gates

708 F. Supp. 2d 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 2010

Defendants rely on Brown v. Gen. Serv. Admin., 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976), to argue that Title VII preempts Kittner’s constitutional claim. … However, it does not follow logically that the absence of the issue in Brown compels the conclusion that the Brown holding is not applicable to the facts in Neely .