Case law

Valley Refining Co. v. Rock Island Refining Co.

167 Okla. 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1934

Baird & McKinnis, 5 Okla. 133 , 48 P. 180 ; Brown v. Davidson, 42 Okla. 598 , 142 P. 387 ; Tally v. Harrison, 60 Okla. 110 , 159 P. 366 . … As was said by this court in Brown v.

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 14, 1990

KOLCUM V. BOARD OF ED. OF WOODBRIDQE SCHOOL DIST. DEL. SUPER., 335 A.2D 618, 621. THE MAXIM OF STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION THAT THE EXPRESSION OF ONE THING OR MORE EXCLUDES THOSE NOT MENTIONED IS APPLICABLE HERE. WILLIAMS V. … STATE V. SMITH, 539 P.2D 754 (OKL. CR. 1975).

MUSKOGEE FAIR HAVEN MANOR v. Scott

957 P.2d 107 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1998

Edwards v. Board of Com'rs, 169 Okla. 87 , 36 P.2d 6 (1934) (the Court's syllabus). Finally, a judge's powers in equity are not invocable when clear and adequate statutory remedies are available. Whig Syndicate, Inc. v. … Tway, Inc. v.

Layne-Western Co. v. City of Depew

177 Okla. 338 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1936

This court has twice recently stated that it will not extend the mandatory rule of the Smartt Case (Smartt v. Board of Com’rs, 67 Okla. 141 , 169 P. 1101 ). See Faught v. … The question of lack of mandatory duty was also passed upon in the cases of Board of Commissioners v. Alexander, 171 Okla. 288 , 42 P. (2d) 884 , and Anadarko Funeral Home v.

Opinion No. 72-302 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 22, 1972

The Attorney General is in receipt of your letter wherein you state in pertinent part: "The Love County Health Center is fully constructed and is being operated by the Board of Controls subject to the authority of the Board … In the case of In re Arbuckle Conservancy District v.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 7, 1979

See Whitten v. Farm and Home Savings and Loan Association of Missouri, 85 P.2d 759 (Okla. 1938), Wickersham v. State Election Board, 357 P.2d 421 (Okla. 1960). … Article V , Section 21 of the Oklahoma Constitution creates the Board on Legislative Compensation and provides in part that "Members of the Legislature shall receive such compensation as shall be fixed by the Board on Legislative

Y & Y CAB COMPANY v. Smith

289 P.2d 964 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 8, 1955

v. … In Brown v. McNair, supra, it was also urged that the verdict was excessive.

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 20, 1999

You have asked whether the State Board of Education is obligated to recover an overpayment of state aid when discovered. In Miller v. … In Board of County Commissioners v.

Opinion No. 76-378 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 17, 1977

Accordingly, such other contract years evidence or information is generally inadmissible and should not be considered by the board. School District No. 39, Mayes County v. … Kurn v. Radencic, 193 Okl. 126 , 141 P.2d 580 (1943), Board of Commissioners v. Enid Springs Sanitarium and Hospital, 116 Okl. 249 , 244 P. 426 (1926), Cavanagh v.

Opinion No. (1997)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 11, 1997

Hughes Drilling Company v. Morgan, 648 P.2d 32 , 35 (Okla. 1982). … Independent School District No. 8 of Seiling v. Swanson, 553 P.2d 496 , 501 (Okla. 1976) (quoting Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Cloudman, citation omitted).

Hiller v. Rist

362 P.2d 678 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1961

Jacobsen v. Howard, 164 Okl. 88 , 23 P.2d 185 . … Jacobsen v. Howard, supra. See also Enders v. Longmire, 179 Okl. 633 , 67 P.2d 12 , and Daniels v. Scott, Okl., 340 P.2d 223, 226, 227 .

Opinion No. 69-204 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 19, 1969

Dry Cleaners Board — Consultant The State Dry Cleaners' Board may hire a person with a strong technical and professional background in the dry cleaning industry who will be able to provide those persons engaged in the cleaning … Special Indemnity Fund v. Prewitt, 201 Okl. 308 , 205 P.2d 306 (1949); Boydston v. State, Okl., 277 P.2d 138 (1954).

Opinion No. (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 20, 1977

Hart v. … See United States v. State Tax Commission of Mississippi, et al., 421 U.S. 599 , 44 L.Ed.2d 404 , 95 S.Ct. 1872 (1975); United States v.

Opinion No. 79-041 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 1979

Such powers and duties are identical to many of the powers and duties of a school board and must be regarded as the exercise of "some portion" of the sovereignty of government. Guthrie Daily Leader v. Cameron, supra. … Edmondson v. State ex rel. Phelps, 533 P.2d 604 , 616 , (Okl. 1975). Under the language of Gibson v.

Dudley v. King

285 P.2d 425 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 26, 1955

Ahrens v. Com. Nat’l Bank, 100 Okl. 250 , 229 P. 237 ; Howard v. Brown, 172 Okl. 308 , 44 P.2d 959 ; Crane v. Owens, 180 Okl. 452 , 69 P.2d 654 . … Ahrens v. Commercial Nat’l. Bank, supra; Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co. v. Arnold, 94 Okl. 120 , 221 P. 19 ; Howard v. Brown, supra; Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. Tradesmen’s Nat. Bank, 10 Cir., 57 F.2d 686 .

Burke Grain Co v. Stinchcomb

70 Okla. 89 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1918

Joseph, Mo. v. Stinchcomb Grain Co., Oklahoma City. … Deal v. Thompson, 51 Okla. 256 , 151 Pac. 866 .

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 15, 1985

Hughes Drilling Co. v. Morgan , 648 P.2d 32 (Okla. 1982). Clearly, then, on its face the Open Meeting Act is applicable to the Board of Regents of Seminole Junior College. See , 70 O.S. 4423 , supra. … However, we find no such exception with regard to the Board of Regents of Seminole Junior College.

Ex Parte Hand

13 Okla. Crim. 614 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1917

Leighnor was appointed to the office of justice of the peace by the board of trustees of said town, and riot by the board of county commissioners of the county. … the town or by the board of county commissioners.

Anderson v. Walker

333 P.2d 570 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1958

Co. v. Excise Board of Garfield County, 167 Ok. 414, 30 P.2d 171 ; Herndon v. Anderson, 165 Okl. 104 , 25 P.2d 326 ; Morrison v. Fry, 208 Okl. 239 , 255 P.2d 270 ; Lowden v. … Board of Commissioners of Harmon County, 161 Okl. 245 , 17 P.2d 690 ; Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 155 Okl. 34 , 7 P.2d 902 .

State v. Raedeker

158 Okla. 248 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1932

Our attention has been called to Myers et al. v. … board. True the evidence shows the conversation with .Thatcher was in the room where the commissioners were Jin session, but no contract was made by the board and no record was made. J. L.