Case law

Opinion No. 49-0509 Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1949

** LUMP SUM APPROPRIATIONS — STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS — CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ** HE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HAS VOTED TO APPROPRIATE A LUMP SUM TO THE STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS TO BE USED BY SAID BOARD … — AFFIRMATIVE (GOVERNOR'S CONTINGENCY FUND) CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 55 (FRED HANSEN)

Fuller v. Getz

168 Okla. 617 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1934

And in Baker v. Gaines Bros. … Whitson v.

Holbird v. State

650 P.2d 66 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 24, 1982

Holmes v. State, supra. … Babek v. State, 587 P.2d 1375 (Okl.Cr.1978). In evaluating the circumstances of this case we find that sufficient intervening factors exist to purge any taint originating from the conduct of the officers. See Brown v.

Opinion No. (2008)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 2008

of Nursing, to order, select, obtain and administer legend drugs, Schedules II through V controlled substances, devices, and medical gases only when engaged in the preanesthetic preparation and evaluation; anesthesia induction … The Board may terminate the authorization granted to a CRNA as follows: d.

Bankers Reserve Life Co. v. Rice

99 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1924

Co. v. Lewis, 187 U. S. 335 , 47 L. Ed. 204 ; Natl. Life Association v. Brown, 103 Ga. 382 , 29 S. E. 927 . … Wallace. 93 Ind. 7 ; Kline v. Natl. Benefit Association, 111 Ind. 462 ; Ferguson v. Union Mutual Life Ins. Co., 187 Mass. 8 ; Brown v. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia (S. C.) 103 S. E. 555 ; Deal v. Deal et al., 87 S.

Finley v. Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Keys

12 Okla. 621 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1903

In People v. … In People v.

Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Milam

45 Okla. 742 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1915

Co. v. Caple’s Adm’x, 110 Va. 514 , 66 S. … It is also held in Payne v. McCormick Harv.

Andrews v. Proctor

196 Okla. 272 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1945

See, also, State v. … Also, see Honnold v. Board of Commissioners of Carter Co., 71 Okla. 71 , 177 P. 71 . In view of the above decisions we are of the opinion that the petition states a cause of action and that, the demurrers of O. P.

Protest of St. Louis-S. F. R. Co.

170 Okla. 123 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1934

See Bristow Battery Co. v. Payne, 123 Okla. 137 , 252 P. 423 ; Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. … The issue raised on this point is fully decided in the recent case of Excise Board of Stephens County v. Chicago, B. I. & P.

Kirk v. McClendon

94 Okla. 33 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1923

When a probate judge acts in this capacity, he acts as any other member of the board, and not as a probate judge or as a probate court.” In the case of Norris v. … See, also, Aldrich v. Barton, 153 Cal. 488 , 95 Pac. 900 .

Keating v. Johnson

67 O.B.A.J. 1680 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1996

McKye v. State Election Board of State of Oklahoma, 890 P.2d 954 (Okla.1995) (State House of Representative seat involved); Nesbitt v. … York v.

Gentry-Bowers Lumber Co. v. Hamill

75 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1919

Lee v. Tonsor, 62 Oklahoma, 161 Pac. 805 ; Clark v. Hall, 10 Kan. 81 . … Co. v. Sayre, 72 Oklahoma, 178 Pac. 671 ; Stetson-Post Mill Co. v. Brown, 21 Wash. 619 , 59 Pac. 507 , 75 Am. St. Rep. 862 .

Opinion No. 75-288 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 2, 1975

Hisel v. State, Okl., 264 P.2d 375 (1953). In McVicker v. … In Tobin v.

Kramer v. Gypsy Oil Co.

68 Okla. 212 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1917

In Sullins et al., Board of County Commissioners, v. State ex rel. Barnard, Commissioner Charities and Corrections, 33 Okla. 526 , 126 Pac. 732 , Judge Turner quotes with approval in Auditor General v. … Supervisor v. Stinson, 4 Hill (N. Y.) 136; Overseers v. Overseers, 18 Johns (N. Y.) 407; Todd v. Birdsell, 1 Cow. (N. Y.) 260 ( 13 Am. Dec. 522 ) ; County Treasurer v. Bunbury, 45 Mich. 84 , 7 N. W. 705 .” In Moore v.

Oklahoma Ass'n of Municipal Attorneys v. State

577 P.2d 1310 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1978

Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority v. Cowen Construction Co., Okl., 518 P.2d 1264 (1974); State ex rel. Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority v. Nashert & Sons, Inc., Okl., 518 P.2d 1267 (1974); and Wiseman v. … LAVENDER, V. C. J., and DAVISON, WILLIAMS, BERRY and BARNES, JJ., concur. HODGES, C.

Ehlinger v. City of Bixby

68 O.B.A.J. 1475 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 1997

It seems logical, though, to apply the same standard of review in this case as applies to other appeals from decisions of the Board of Review. … Ehlinger v. City of Bixby, No. 92-C-300 (N.D.Okla., Order dated April 5, 1993); Admin.Rec., pp. 163-72; Rec., pp. 194-203. .

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1990

IN OKLAHOMA CITY V. … NO. 85-058, SUPRA, UTILIZING THE ELEMENTS ENUNCIATED IN OKLAHOMA CITY V.

Opinion No. (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 9, 1976

However, in the case of Sacramento Newspaper Guild, etc. v. … In the case of Laman v.

Opinion No. 75-159 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 2, 1975

See Dixon v. Zick, Colo., 500 P.2d 130 . … an individual not seeking licensure from the Board to perform psychological services under the direct supervision of a licensed psychologist, provided, however that such person has prior Board approval to perform such services

Dobry v. Dobry Flour Mills, Inc.

270 P.2d 317 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1954

As a result of this dis-^ cussion a special meeting of the board of directors was held on December 18, 1947, at which time the board voted to give the plaintiff a salary allowance of $300 per month which was to begin November … J., JOHNSON, V. €. J.’ and HORN, DAVISON, O’NEAL, WILLIAMS and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur. ■