Case law

Petties v. District of Columbia

881 F. Supp. 63 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 4, 1995

See Cox v. Brown, 498 F.Supp. at 827-30 ; Fisher v. District of Columbia, 828 F.Supp. at 88-90 . … See Cox v. Brown, 498 F.Supp. at 829 . C.

Wine v. U.S. Department of the Interior

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 29, 2022

See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). But the Court will deny Wine’s Motion for Discovery. Wine claims he needs discovery to know who to sue in an Amended Complaint. … United States v. Fausto, 484 U.S. 439, 455 (1988). If an agency removes an employee, CSRA gives him the right to counsel and a hearing before the Board. See Elgin v. Dept. of Treasury, 567 U.S. 1, 6 (2012).

Dingwall v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority

766 A.2d 974 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 2001

In Simmons v. District of Columbia Armory Bd., 656 A.2d 1155 (D.C.1995) (per curiam), the plaintiff purported to bring an action against the District of Columbia Armory Board. … As with the Housing Authority in Braxton [v. Nat’l Capital Rous. Awth., 396 A.2d 215, 217 (D.C.1978) ], Congress has not authorized the Armory Board to be sued. Id. at 1157.

United States v. Diggs

161 F. App'x 7 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 16, 2005

. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 860(a) was tainted by the Government’s knowing use of perjured testimony at his trial, requiring the conviction to be set aside under United States v. … In fact, Diggs contends, Brown had not been “rehired” by MPD in any official capacity, but rather was serving only as an unpaid consultant. We conclude that this case is controlled by United States v.

Hobson ex rel. Hobson v. Hansen

320 F. Supp. 409 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 14, 1970

Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 , 74 S.Ct. 693 , 98 L.Ed. 884 , (1954), Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), and their progeny. … Justice Jackson wrote for the Supreme Court in West Virginia State Board of Education v.

Harrison v. United States

267 A.2d 368 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1970

Miler v. United States, D.C.App., 255 A.2d 497 (1969); see Gadsden v. United States, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 162 , 223 F.2d 627 (1955); GS Crim. Rule 32(a) ((1). 2 . … Number two is a Negro male, 18, to 20, 5' 6" to 5' 8", 150 lbs, close cut hair, brown pullover sweater, armed with a small dark revolver.” (Tr. 20) 3 .

Hornsby v. Federal Housing Finance Agency

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 2025

Miles v. … The Board did not err by denying relief on that basis. V.

Aubin v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 5, 2015

Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). In all events, the municipality’s liability can be predicated "only [upon] acts for which the municipality itselfis actually responsible.” City ofSt. Louis v. … Id; see also Allen v.

Urciolo v. Washington

305 A.2d 252 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1973

Trinity Methodist Church, South v. Federal Radio Com’n, 61 App.D.C. 311 , 62 F.2d 850 , cert. denied, 284 U.S. 685 , 52 S.Ct. 204 , 76 L.Ed. 579 (1932). See also Keyes v. … Berrigan v. Sigler, Chairman of the Board of Parole, et al., 475 F.2d 918 (D.C.Cir., 1978). .

Cauthen v. United States

592 A.2d 1021 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1991

Goldston v. United States, 562 A.2d 96, 100 (D.C.1989). On appeal, this court makes an independent determination of whether there was reasonable suspicion, Brown v. … E.g., Jefferson v.

United States v. Elmer Jones

514 F.2d 1331 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 1975

See United States v. Dougherty, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 76 , 473 F.2d 1113 (1973). See also Brown v. United States, supra, at 369 — 70 (Washington, J., dissenting); Adams v. United States ex rel. … We need not resolve the question whether this right has constitutional status — see the opinions in Brown v.

Roberts v. United States

883 F. Supp. 2d 56 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 23, 2012

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)); accord Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93 (2007) (per curiam). … . § 1552(a)); see Mueller v. Winter, 485 F.3d 1191, 1198 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (applying standard to decision by Board for Correction of Naval Records).

United States ex rel. Thomson v. Custis

35 App. D.C. 247 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 10, 1910

Rep. 231; Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U. S. 505 , 47 L. ed. 563, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 390; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11 , 49 L. ed. 643, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 358, 3 A. & E. Ann. Cas. 765; New York ex rel. Lieberman v. … Reetz v. Michigan, and Dent v. West Virginia, supra.

Stephen Taylor v. Michael Huerta

723 F.3d 210 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 2013

Transportation Safety Board Timothy V. … in Cooper v.

Matter of Austern

524 A.2d 680 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1987

497 A.2d 1062 (D.C. 1985) (holding that respondent’s submission of false information in resume sent to prospective employer violated DR1-102(A)(4) and warranted public censure); Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. … The Board therefore assumed, as we do, that the Hearing Committee intended to recommend a reprimand by the Board. 9 .

Browne v. Dyson

38 App. D.C. 5 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 7, 1911

been awarded priority to Browne.” … Couper and Somers v. Bannister, 1904 C. D. 424; s. c. 112, Off. Gaz. 1480; Griffiths v. Taylor, 91 M. S. A. D. 1908. In both cases there were but two opposing parties.

Coombs v. United States

399 A.2d 1313 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1979

Brown v. United States, 134 U.S.App.D.C. 269 , 414 F.2d 1165 (1969). … It was therefore error to give the missing witness instruction. 9 See Brown v. United States, supra, 134 U.S.App.D.C. at 271-72 , 414 F.2d at 1167-68 ; Wynn v.

In Re Hirschfeld

622 A.2d 688 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1993

See United States v. Hirschfeld, 964 F.2d 318 (4th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1067 , 122 L.Ed.2d 371 (1993), rehearing denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1437 , 122 L.Ed.2d 803 (1993). … As for what should happen next, the Board proposes two alternatives. The Board could continue to follow the procedure it used in this case.

St. Vincent's Medical Center v. Burwell

222 F. Supp. 3d 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 21, 2016

University v. … Shalala, 512 U.S. at 512 , 114 S.Ct. 2381 , quoting Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 325 U.S. 410, 414 , 65 S.Ct. 1215 , 89 L.Ed. 1700 (1945) and Gardebring v.

Brier v. Orenberg

90 A.2d 832 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 1952

Creighton v. Brown, D.C.Mun.App., 77 A.2d 559 ; Restatement, Contracts, § 250 (1932). When the settlement date arrived and1 the assignment had not been obtained buyer was clearly within his rights in refusing to settle. … Creighton v. Brown, supra; Restatement, Contracts §§ 395, 250(a), 257 (1932); 3 Williston, Contracts, § 633 et seq., § 1970 (Revised ed. 1936). Reversed. 1 .