Case law

Woods Petroleum Corp. v. Delhi Gas Pipeline Corp.

700 P.2d 1023 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1985

Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Brown, Okl., 477 P.2d 67 (1970). This question was then properly submitted to the jury. State ex rel. Pollution Control Coordinating Board v. Kerr-McGee Corp., Okl., 619 P.2d 858 (1980). … In Kavanaugh v.

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 23, 1992

V. FORTINBERRY CO., 207 P.2D 301, 304 (OKLA. 1949). … UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 2 O.S. 96 , THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY FREE FAIR BOARDS OR ASSOCIATIONS, WHILE HAVING THE AUTHORITY TO "EXPEND FUNDS OF THE COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION," ARE ADMONISHED THAT "IN NO CASE SHALL THE

New Vinita Hardware Co. v. Porter

45 Okla. 470 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1915

BROWN, J. … See Avants v. Bruner, 39 Okla. 730 , 136 Pac. 593 ; Collier v. Gannon, 40 Okla. 275 , 137 Pac. 1179 ; St. L. & S. R. Co. v. Shepard, 40 Okla. 589 , 139 Pac. 833 ; Kelley v. State, 40 Okla. 355 , 138 Pac. 167 .

American Sash & Door Co. v. McGregor

129 Okla. 261 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1926

Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Cook, 105 Okla. 185 , 231 P. 495 , and Klein v. … In the case of Smith v.

City of Del City v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 114

65 O.B.A.J. 44 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1993

Board of Comm’rs v. … As stated in Board of Educ. v.

State Ex Rel. State Insurance Fund v. District Court of Oklahoma County

278 P.2d 841 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1954

Construction Co. v. Burwell, 185 Okl. 444 , 93 P.2d 1092 . … Vette v. Childers, 102 Okl. 140 , 228 P. 145 .

Dierks Lumber & Coal Co. v. Hagan

189 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1941

Eubanks v. Barnsdall *212 Oil Co., 169 Okla. 31 , 35 P. 2d 873 ; Fox v. Brown, 176 Okla. 201 , 55 P. 2d 129 ; Shawnee Cotton Oil Co. v. Bumgarner, 180 Okla. 103 , 67 P. 2d 959 . … Fox v. Brown, supra. Pine Valley Lumber Co. v. Watson, supra.

City of Tulsa v. Roberts

188 Okla. 249 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 1940

To say that it has been adopted because the board has given no expression to the contrary would not do. … The decision in Urquhart v. Ogdensburgh, on its second hearing in this court, illustrates the distinction ( 97 N. Y. 238 ).” Consider, also, Ford v. Des Moines (1898) 106 Iowa, 94 , 75 N. W. 630 ; Brown v.

Lockhart v. Teachers' Retirement System

69 O.B.A.J. 1518 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1998

Bay Petroleum Corp. v. … See City of Hugo v. State ex rel. Public Employees Relations Board, 1994 OK 134 , 886 P.2d 485 ; Dugger v. State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 1992 OK 105 , 834 P.2d 964 .

Opinion No. 76-279 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1976

BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS — SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION OF LICENSES OF PHYSICIANS FOR INCOMPETENCE OR NEGLIGENCE The Board of Medical Examiners, pursuant to 59 O.S. 509 [ 59-509 ] (1975), can suspend or revoke the license … (Emphasis added) The Kansas Supreme Court in Kansas State Board of Healing Arts v.

Valley Refining Co. v. Rock Island Refining Co.

167 Okla. 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1934

Baird & McKinnis, 5 Okla. 133 , 48 P. 180 ; Brown v. Davidson, 42 Okla. 598 , 142 P. 387 ; Tally v. Harrison, 60 Okla. 110 , 159 P. 366 . … As was said by this court in Brown v.

STATE ex rel. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION v. PENNINGTON

417 P.3d 1274 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 2018

OF TRANSPORTATION v. … WADE PENNINGTON and SHARON PENNINGTON, husband and wife; and PENNINGTON PROPERTIES, L.L.C., Defendants/Appellants, The Pontotoc County Board of Commissioners, Defendant.

Spalding v. Enid Cemetery Ass'n

76 Okla. 180 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1919

Co. v. Rockland, 36 C. C. … Other eases to the same effect are Tausig v. St. Louis & K. R. Co., 65 S. W. 969 ; Railroad Co. v. Richards, 8 Kan. 101 .

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 10, 1988

Second, as a member of the Board, he acts as an active participant in the full range of substantive and policy making functions of the Board. … Lekan v. P L Fire Protection District, 609 P.2d 1289 (Okla. 1980); State ex rel. Dawson v.

Opinion No. 72-302 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 22, 1972

The Attorney General is in receipt of your letter wherein you state in pertinent part: "The Love County Health Center is fully constructed and is being operated by the Board of Controls subject to the authority of the Board … In the case of In re Arbuckle Conservancy District v.

In Re Myres

172 Okla. 123 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1934

This is a proceeding to review the findings and an order of recommendation of the Board of Governors of the State Bar of Oklahoma that respondent, Wm. J. B. … J., CULLISON, V. C. X, and SWINDALL, McNEILL, OSBORN, and BUSBY, concur. ANDREWS and BAYLESS, JJ., absent.

Y & Y CAB COMPANY v. Smith

289 P.2d 964 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 8, 1955

v. … In Brown v. McNair, supra, it was also urged that the verdict was excessive.

White v. State

4 Okla. Crim. 143 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1910

In the case of Blair v. … In George v. United States, 1 Okla.

Perdue v. Sapp

205 Okla. 529 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1951

The election board decided the contest against him and he appealed to the district court. The district court affirmed the order of the county election board and Perdue attempted to appeal to this court, and in Perdue v. … In Perdue v.

Sowell v. State

620 P.2d 429 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 7, 1980

United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873 , 95 S.Ct. 2574 , 45 L.Ed.2d 607 (1975). As stated recently in the United States Supreme Court decision of Brown v. … Brown v. Texas, supra. In summing up the actions of Officer Barham it is apparent that he intended to stop and detain the defendant because he “looked suspicious.”