Case law

In re Andre P. Barber

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 2015

State Bar v. Attorney-Respondent, 367 So. 2d 179, 185 (Miss. 1979); In re Baun, 232 N.W.2d 621, 624-25 (Mich. 1975); cf. Littlejohn v. … United States v. Wong, 431 U.S. 174, 178 (1977). 5 Mr.

Alliance for Responsible CFC Policy, Inc. v. Costle

631 F. Supp. 1469 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 7, 1986

Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 744 (D.C.Cir.1979). 2. Commercial Benefit and Plaintiffs Interest The second and third factors are closely related and often are evaluated together. See Fenster v. … No. 854, at 19; see also Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d at 743-44 ; Cuneo v. Rumsfeld, 553 F.2d at 1368 ; Simon v. United States, 587 F.Supp. at 1032 .

Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

225 F. Supp. 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 1964

As was said by Chief Justice Hughes in Home Building & Loan Association v. … The court based its ruling on Thompson v. Whittier, 365 U.S. 465 , 81 S.Ct. 712 , 5 L.Ed.2d 704 , reversing D.C., 185 F.Supp. 306, 307 ; International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union v.

Kakaes v. George Washington University

683 A.2d 128 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1996

Perrin v. … In Farrington v.

In re Wallace

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 2025

See Kaushiva v. … Counsel for Discipline, Nebraska Supreme Court v.

District of Columbia v. W.T. Galliher & Brother, Inc.

656 A.2d 296 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1995

JBG Properties, Inc. v. District of Columbia Office of Human Rights, 364 A.2d 1183, 1185 (D.C.1976); see Abolaji v. District of Columbia Taxicab Comm’n, 609 A.2d 671, 672 (D.C. 1992); Teamsters Local 1714 v. … Public Employee Relations Board, 579 A.2d 706, 709-710 (D.C.1990); Vann v. District of Columbia Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers, 441 A.2d 246, 248 (D.C.1982).

National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc., and United Motor Freight, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Emery Air Freight Corporation, Intervenor

374 F.2d 266 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 1967

This case came on to be heard on the record from the Civil Aeronautics Board, and was argued by counsel. … ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the order of the Civil Aeronautics Board on review herein is affirmed. See *267 Law Motor Freight v.

Board of Trustees of Unite Here Local 25 and Hotel Association of Washington, D.C. Pension Fund v. Mr Watergate LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 6, 2010

[Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)]. … Kowal v. MCI Commc'ns Corp., 16 F. 3d 1271, 1276 (D.C. Cir. 1994)). II.

Hunt v. United States

171 A.2d 515 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1961

Dumbra v. United States, 268 U.S. 435, 441 , 45 S.Ct. 546, 549 , 69 L.Ed. 1032, 1036 . 4 . Harris v. … Rodriguez v. United States, 5 Cir., 227 F.2d 912 ; United States v. Kaiser, 7 Cir., 138 F.2d 219 , certiorari denied 320 U.S. 801 , 64 S.Ct. 431 , 88 L.Ed. 483 .

Pettiford v. Secretary of the Navy

774 F. Supp. 2d 173 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2011

Poole v. … v.

Quinn v. National Mortgage & Investment Co.

57 F.2d 410 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 8, 1932

Bramhall, 4 shares; and Eunice V. Avery, 1 share. … See Ruling Case Law, vol. 27, p. 211, par. 12; Brown v. Slocum, 30 App. D. C. 576; Nichols v. Fearson, 7 Pet. 103 , 8 L. Ed. 623 .

In Re Stanton

757 A.2d 87 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 2000

Board Rule 9.2. … See, e.g., Carmell v. Texas, - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1620, 1627-29 , 146 L.Ed.2d 577 (2000) (defining doctrine). 6 . We note that the United States District Court for the District of Columbia recently stated in Stanton v.

In Re Larsen

589 A.2d 400 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 12, 1991

of client funds. 1 We accept the Board’s recommendation and impose the discipline recommended by the Board. … The Maryland Proceedings The Maryland proceedings began when a physician, Indira V.

D.C. Department of Health v. D.C. Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 2022

See Yee v. … DOH’s final retort is that the OEA Board has previously taken a different position on this point, and that we should defer to its earlier interpretation. See Jackson v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Gen.

Providence Hospital v. Dorsey

634 A.2d 1216 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1993

At that hearing, the hospital presented a prima facie case of an implied in fact contract which would establish the underlying liability of appellee. 7 See Vereen v. Clayborne, 623 A.2d 1190, 1193 (D.C.1993); Brown v. … Brown v. Brown, supra, 524 A.2d at 1190 .

Crowley v. Smithsonian Institution

636 F.2d 738 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 30, 1980

Id. at 106 , 89 S.Ct. at 271 ; see also Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 15-16 , 67 S.Ct. 504, 511 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947). … Brown v. Houston Independent School District, 417 U.S. 969 , 94 S.Ct. 3173 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1140 (1974); Willoughby v.

In Re Ryan

670 A.2d 375 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1996

II Respondent does not contest the recommended sanctions of the Board; instead she objects generally to the Board’s findings, arguing that the Board “completely ignored the facts as they were outlined by the witnesses _” … Nolan v. Foreman, 665 F.2d 738 , 739 n. 3 (5th Cir.1982) (citations omitted).

In re C.J.

514 A.2d 460 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1986

Auxier v. Kraisel, 466 A.2d 416, 418 (D.C.1983) (per curiam); see also Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVay, 431 A.2d 543, 546-47 (D.C.1981). … Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 765 , 66 S.Ct. 1239, 1248 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946); see also Hairston v. United States, 500 A.2d 994, 998 (D.C.1985); Washington v. United States, 499 A.2d 95 , 102 (D.C. 1985).

Bolandz v. 1230-1250 Twenty-Third Street Condominium Unit Owners Ass'n

849 A.2d 1010 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 20, 2004

“Accordingly,” the court concluded, citing Johnson v. Hobson, 505 A.2d 1318 (D.C.1986), it “may not substitute its judgment for that of the Board.” Bolandz appealed the court’s' order to this court. II. … Ass’n, Inc., 844 A.2d 1126, 1137 (2004) (quoting Brehm v. Eisner, 746 A.2d 244 , 264 n. 66 (Del.2000)). .

Berenguer v. University Legal Services, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 2022

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 US 662, 677–78 (2009). … See Loya v. Sebelius, 840 F.