Case law

McManus v. State

695 P.2d 884 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 1985

Westerman v. State, 525 P.2d 1359 (Okl.Cr.1974). … Webster v. State, 96 Okl.Cr. 44 , 248 P.2d 646 (1952). Improper questioning by the prosecutor is also complained of in this case.

Powell v. Johnson-Larimer Dry Goods Co.

35 Okla. 644 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1913

Healy v. Davis, 32 Okla. 296, 122 Pac. 157 ; Fairbanks-Morse & Co. v. Thurmond, 31 Okla. 612 , 122 Pac. 167 . … Iliff v. Arnott, 31 Kan. 672 , 3 Pac. 525 ; Brown v. Clark et al., 31 Kan. 521 , 3 Pac. 415 ; 2 Cyc. 797. The appeal is therefore dismissed. All the Justices concur.

Hiller v. Rist

362 P.2d 678 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1961

Jacobsen v. Howard, 164 Okl. 88 , 23 P.2d 185 . … Jacobsen v. Howard, supra. See also Enders v. Longmire, 179 Okl. 633 , 67 P.2d 12 , and Daniels v. Scott, Okl., 340 P.2d 223, 226, 227 .

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 23, 1992

V. FORTINBERRY CO., 207 P.2D 301, 304 (OKLA. 1949). … UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 2 O.S. 96 , THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY FREE FAIR BOARDS OR ASSOCIATIONS, WHILE HAVING THE AUTHORITY TO "EXPEND FUNDS OF THE COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION," ARE ADMONISHED THAT "IN NO CASE SHALL THE

Opinion No. (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 20, 1977

Hart v. … See United States v. State Tax Commission of Mississippi, et al., 421 U.S. 599 , 44 L.Ed.2d 404 , 95 S.Ct. 1872 (1975); United States v.

Opinion No. 69-204 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 19, 1969

Dry Cleaners Board — Consultant The State Dry Cleaners' Board may hire a person with a strong technical and professional background in the dry cleaning industry who will be able to provide those persons engaged in the cleaning … Special Indemnity Fund v. Prewitt, 201 Okl. 308 , 205 P.2d 306 (1949); Boydston v. State, Okl., 277 P.2d 138 (1954).

Hillcrest Medical Center v. State Ex Rel. Department of Corrections

675 P.2d 432 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 1983

Section 247 is “simply a limitation upon the powers of the County Commissioners, and is designed to prevent them from allowing stale claims”, Board of Commissioners of Rogers County v. … Smartt v. Board of County Commissioners of Craig County, 67 Okl. 141 , 169 P. 1101 (1918). Smartt was followed in Protest of Kansas City Southern Ry.

New Vinita Hardware Co. v. Porter

45 Okla. 470 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1915

BROWN, J. … See Avants v. Bruner, 39 Okla. 730 , 136 Pac. 593 ; Collier v. Gannon, 40 Okla. 275 , 137 Pac. 1179 ; St. L. & S. R. Co. v. Shepard, 40 Okla. 589 , 139 Pac. 833 ; Kelley v. State, 40 Okla. 355 , 138 Pac. 167 .

American Sash & Door Co. v. McGregor

129 Okla. 261 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1926

Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Cook, 105 Okla. 185 , 231 P. 495 , and Klein v. … In the case of Smith v.

Billus v. State

7 Okla. Crim. 37 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1912

In the case of Cohn v. State, 4 Okla. … See Blitz v. Brown, 7 Wall. 693, 19 L. Ed. 280 . We cannot consider the transcript of the record, because it is not certified to by the clerk of the superior court. The appeal must be dismissed.

City of Del City v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 114

65 O.B.A.J. 44 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1993

Board of Comm’rs v. … As stated in Board of Educ. v.

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 1, 2000

Sullivant v. City of Oklahoma City, 940 P.2d 220 , 224 (Okla. 1997). … See Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe, 498 U.S. 505 , 509 (1991). Indian tribes are not, however, in and of themselves states. See Stephens v. Cherokee Nation, 174 U.S. 445 , 483-86 (1899).

Dierks Lumber & Coal Co. v. Hagan

189 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1941

Eubanks v. Barnsdall *212 Oil Co., 169 Okla. 31 , 35 P. 2d 873 ; Fox v. Brown, 176 Okla. 201 , 55 P. 2d 129 ; Shawnee Cotton Oil Co. v. Bumgarner, 180 Okla. 103 , 67 P. 2d 959 . … Fox v. Brown, supra. Pine Valley Lumber Co. v. Watson, supra.

City of Tulsa v. Roberts

188 Okla. 249 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 1940

To say that it has been adopted because the board has given no expression to the contrary would not do. … The decision in Urquhart v. Ogdensburgh, on its second hearing in this court, illustrates the distinction ( 97 N. Y. 238 ).” Consider, also, Ford v. Des Moines (1898) 106 Iowa, 94 , 75 N. W. 630 ; Brown v.

Dudley v. King

285 P.2d 425 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 26, 1955

Ahrens v. Com. Nat’l Bank, 100 Okl. 250 , 229 P. 237 ; Howard v. Brown, 172 Okl. 308 , 44 P.2d 959 ; Crane v. Owens, 180 Okl. 452 , 69 P.2d 654 . … Ahrens v. Commercial Nat’l. Bank, supra; Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co. v. Arnold, 94 Okl. 120 , 221 P. 19 ; Howard v. Brown, supra; Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. Tradesmen’s Nat. Bank, 10 Cir., 57 F.2d 686 .

Opinion No. 76-279 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1976

BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS — SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION OF LICENSES OF PHYSICIANS FOR INCOMPETENCE OR NEGLIGENCE The Board of Medical Examiners, pursuant to 59 O.S. 509 [ 59-509 ] (1975), can suspend or revoke the license … (Emphasis added) The Kansas Supreme Court in Kansas State Board of Healing Arts v.

Opinion No. 74-203 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1974

The Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of Poafpybitty, et al v. … The Court has more recently held in the case of Trask v.

Opinion No. 71-310 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 30, 1971

The case of Sparks v. … See, also, 53 A.L.R. 595 , 93 A.L.R. 333 ann.; 42 Am.Jur. 88; Harley v. Board of City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 , 162 P. 797 ."

Valley Refining Co. v. Rock Island Refining Co.

167 Okla. 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1934

Baird & McKinnis, 5 Okla. 133 , 48 P. 180 ; Brown v. Davidson, 42 Okla. 598 , 142 P. 387 ; Tally v. Harrison, 60 Okla. 110 , 159 P. 366 . … As was said by this court in Brown v.

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 14, 1990

KOLCUM V. BOARD OF ED. OF WOODBRIDQE SCHOOL DIST. DEL. SUPER., 335 A.2D 618, 621. THE MAXIM OF STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION THAT THE EXPRESSION OF ONE THING OR MORE EXCLUDES THOSE NOT MENTIONED IS APPLICABLE HERE. WILLIAMS V. … STATE V. SMITH, 539 P.2D 754 (OKL. CR. 1975).