Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.31s
2015 NCBC 53 · North Carolina Business Court · May 29, 2015
The DeCristoforos also informed the Board of Directors that Givens was verbally abusive to V. … (alteration in original) (quoting Dishner Developers, Inc. v. Brown, 145 N.C. App. 375, 378, 549 S.E.2d 904, 906 (2001))). VI.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHubbard v. County of Cumberland
143 N.C. App. 149 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 2001
For example, in Smith v. … See Pritchard v. Elizabeth City, 81 N.C.
Cited 11 timesPublished14 N.C. App. 93 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 29, 1972
The Planning Board recommended to the Board of Aider-men that the permit be issued. … See Kenan v. Chapel Hill filed in this Court on 29 March 1972. We will not therefore discuss this argument except to say that it is overruled.
Cited 3 timesPublished126 N.C. 989 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1900
In Asheville v. … In State v. Worth, 116 N.
Cited 14 timesPublished225 N.C. 648 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1945
have been seen operating tbe boards, and, on one occasion, when tbe defendant was present. … See S. v. Everitt, 164 N. C., 399 , 79 S. E., 274 ; S. v. Hardin, 183 N. C., 815 , 112 S. E., 593 ; S. v. Pelley, 221 N. C., 487 , 20 S. E. (2d), 850 , and many others of like import.
Cited 4 timesPublished106 N.C. 468 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890
Brown v. Brown, 2 Murphey, 350; Rankin v. Rankin, 9 Ired., 156 ; Wester v. Wester, 5 Jones, 95; Haden v. Bradshaw, 1 Winst., 263; Smith v. Smith, 63 N. C , 637; Ired. on Ex’rs, 21.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPorsh Builders, Inc. v. City of Winston-Salem
302 N.C. 550 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1981
Campbell v. First Baptist Church, 298 N.C. 476 , 259 S.E. 2d 558 (1979); Matter of Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4, 296 N.C. 1 , 249 S.E. 2d 698 (1978); Koontz v. … Jolly v. Wright, 300 N.C. 83 , 265 S.E. 2d 135 (1980); Williams v. Williams, 299 N.C. 174 , 261 S.E. 2d 849 (1980); State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v.
Cited 48 timesPublished135 N.C. App. 729 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1999
State v. … Motor Co. v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 35 N.C.App. 536, 538 , 241 S.E.2d 727, 729 (1978). Typically, relief is either specific performance of the plea agreement or withdrawal of the plea itself (i.e. rescission).
Cited 24 timesPublishedEllis v. Trustees of the Graded School of Oxford
156 N.C. 10 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 13, 1911
(Board of Trustees v. Webb, 155 N. … Smith v. School Trustees, 141 N.
Cited 8 timesPublished304 N.C. 68 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1981
V. … Thompson v. Wake County Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E. 2d 538 .
Cited 56 timesPublishedVance S. Harrington & Co. v. Renner
236 N.C. 321 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1952
Kinney v. Sutton, 230 N.C. 404 , 53 S.E.2d 306 ; Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E.2d 128 , 168 A.L.R. 1 ; Appeal of Parker, 214 N.C. 51 , 197 S.E. 706 ; Elizabeth City v. … Martin v. Board of Com'rs of Wake, 208 N.C. 354 , 180 S.E. 777 ; Jones v. Madison County Com'rs, 137 N.C. 579 , 50 S.E. 291 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedCFA Medical, Inc. v. Burkhalter
95 N.C. App. 391 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1989
Cameron-Brown Co. v. Daves, 83 N.C. App. 281, 285 , 350 S.E.2d 111, 114 (1986). For only then will the nonresident have acted in such a way such that “he can reasonably anticipate being haled into *395 court there.” … Cameron-Brown Co. v. Daves, 83 N.C. App. 281 , 350 S.E.2d 111 (1986); Brickman v. Codella, 83 N.C. App. 377 , 350 S.E.2d 164 (1986).
Cited 15 timesPublished202 N.C. 358 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 9, 1932
Brown v. Brown, 124 N. C., 19 , 32 S. E., 320 ; Powell v. Benthall, 136 N. C., 145 , 48 S. E., 598 ; Cottle v. Johnson, 179 N. C., 426 , 102 S. E., 769 ; Rose v. Dean, 192 N. C., 556 , 135 S. E., 348 ; Hyatt v. … E., 807 ; Townsend v. Holderby, 197 N. C., 550 , 149 S. E., 855 .
Cited 12 timesPublished215 N.C. App. 576 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 20, 2011
We cannot agree with the Board’s argument, as it would undermine policy considerations, including prevention of fragmentary appeals and avoidance of inefficiencies and confusion of the issues. Thomas v. … State v. Buckom, 126 N.C. App. 368, 378 , 485 S.E.2d 319, 326 (1997) (citation omitted).
Cited 2 timesPublished2021 NCBC 3 · North Carolina Business Court · Jan 19, 2021
Co. v. … See Zerbey v. J.H. Zerbey Newspapers, Inc., 560 A.2d 191, 198 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1989). i. LORD’s Board Minutes 29.
Cited 0 timesPublished152 F. Supp. 295 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 10, 1957
Guinn v. United States, 238 U.S. 347 , 35 S.Ct. 926 , 59 L.Ed. 1340 ; Myers v. Anderson, 238 U.S. 368 , 35 S.Ct. 932 , 59 L.Ed. 1349 . … Guinn v. United States, 238 U.S. 347, 360 , 35 S.Ct. 932 ; Williams v. State of Mississippi, 170 U.S. 213 , 18 S.Ct. 583 , 42 L.Ed. 1012 ; Davis v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2020
at 733, 537 S.E.2d at 857 (citation and quotation marks omitted); see also Brown v. … Defendant seeks to distinguish this case from Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished44 N.C. App. 50 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1979
*52 Bunn v. Bunn, 262 N.C. 67 , 136 S.E. 2d 240 (1964), discussed in detail the two kinds of consent judgment which provide for payment to the wife. … Holden v. Holden, 245 N.C. 1 , 95 S.E. 2d 118 (1956); Stanley v. Stanley, 226 N.C. 129 , 37 S.E. 2d 118 (1946); Brown v. Brown, 224 N.C. 556 , 31 S.E. 2d 529 (1944); Britt v. Britt, 36 N.C.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Burnette ex rel. Liptow
131 N.C. App. 840 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 29, 1998
See Veazey v. City of Durham, 231 N.C. 357 , 57 S.E.2d 377 (1950). Because further action is required by the trial court to make it a final judgment, it is interlocutory. N.C. Dept. of Transportation v. Page, 119 N.C. … Liggett Group v. Sunas, 113 N.C. App. 19 , 437 S.E.2d 674 (1993).
Cited 3 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 1, 2022
STATE V. … Thus, the brown material is not within the Industrial Hemp Act’s STATE V.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna