Case law

Hunt v. United States

171 A.2d 515 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1961

Dumbra v. United States, 268 U.S. 435, 441 , 45 S.Ct. 546, 549 , 69 L.Ed. 1032, 1036 . 4 . Harris v. … Rodriguez v. United States, 5 Cir., 227 F.2d 912 ; United States v. Kaiser, 7 Cir., 138 F.2d 219 , certiorari denied 320 U.S. 801 , 64 S.Ct. 431 , 88 L.Ed. 483 .

Saint-Fleur v. McHugh

83 F. Supp. 3d 149 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2015

Camp v. … Cir. 2012) (reviewing a military board decision under the standards of the APA and administrative case law); Piersall v. Winter, 435 F.3d. 319, 322 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (same); Frizelle v. Slater, 111 F.3d 172, 176 (D.C.

In re Atkinson

785 A.2d 318 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 2001

PER CURIAM: In this reciprocal discipline case originating in Maryland, the Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that Rena V. … Accordingly, and substantially for the reasons stated by the Board, Rena V.

Compton v. Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.

80 F. Supp. 3d 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2015

Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305, 317 (1988). … See generally Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 300 (1955); see also Cobell v. Norton, 240 F.3d 1081, 1108 (D.C.

Kaiser Gill v. DOJ

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 2017

There, the Court considered whether the Merit Systems Protection Board could review the Navy’s denial of a security clearance. 484 U.S. at 520. … The government next argues that, even if courts may review some security clearance–related equal protection claims, Gill’s are precluded by Title VII because he alleges discrimination in employment and under Brown v.

Geier v. Jordan

107 A.2d 440 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1954

Brown v. Shimabukuro, 73 App.D.C. 194 , 118 F.2d 17 ; Young v. Young, 57 App.D.C. 157 , 18 F.2d 807 . … Brown v. Robertson, 120 Ind.App. 434 , 92 N.E.2d 856, 858 , quoting 1 Am.Jur., Abuse of Process § 6. (Emphasis supplied.) See also, Ligitsos v. Finerman, 329 Ill.App. 241 , 67 N.E.2d 610 .

Matter of Campbell

572 A.2d 1059 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1990

United States v. Campbell, 874 F.2d 838 (1st Cir.1989). Based on his conviction, respondent was disbarred by the Supreme Court of Maine. See Board of Overseers v. Campbell, Docket No. Bar-87-15 (Me.1989). … Citing Mathews v.

Barbour v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

499 A.2d 122 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 1985

We first were called on to address this provision in Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 377 A.2d 436 (D.C.1977). … Our next case evaluating the “labor dispute” disqualification was National Broadcasting Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, supra.

Bossier Parish School Bd. v. Reno

907 F. Supp. 434 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 2, 1995

See Holder v. … Chan v.

Cable News Network, Inc. v. Central Intelligence Agency

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 2023

CNN v. FBI, 384 F. … Vento v. I.R.S., 714 F.

Jovanovic v. US-Algeria Business Council

561 F. Supp. 2d 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 2008

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 244 (D.C.Cir.2002). … See Hill v. U.S.

In Re Morrison

851 A.2d 430 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 27, 2004

No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation have been filed. … Comm. of Maryland v. Morrison, Misc. Docket AG, No. 25, September Term 2002. On June 13, 2003, Bar Counsel filed a certified copy of the order from the Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Quinn v. National Mortgage & Investment Co.

57 F.2d 410 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 8, 1932

Bramhall, 4 shares; and Eunice V. Avery, 1 share. … See Ruling Case Law, vol. 27, p. 211, par. 12; Brown v. Slocum, 30 App. D. C. 576; Nichols v. Fearson, 7 Pet. 103 , 8 L. Ed. 623 .

National Ass'n of Waterfront Employers v. Chao

587 F. Supp. 2d 90 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2008

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 302-03 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979).

McDonough v. Stackley

245 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 2017

A district court may review the decision of a military board of correction using “familiar principles of administrative law.” Kreis v. Sec’y of the Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1511 (D.C. Cir. 1989); see also Piersall v. … . § 706(2)(A), courts review board decisions under an “unusually deferential” application of that standard. Kreis, 866 F.2d at 1514; Cone v.

Asare v. Loews Hotels

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2014

See Minch v. District of Columbia, 952 A.2d 929, 941-42 (D.C. 2008). As a result, this claim fails. The retaliation claim – pressed only by Brown – is similarly infirm for two reasons. … First, Brown has not sufficiently alleged that he engaged in any protected activity, see Lemmons v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp., 431 F.

Gaines v. District of Columbia

961 F. Supp. 2d 218 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2013

From 1998 to 2012, Gaines met, corresponded, or spoke with employees of the District of Columbia Lottery Board (hereinafter “DCLB”) on a number of occasions. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 919 F. Supp. 2d 105, ___ (D.D.C. 2013) (citing EEOC v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial Sch., 117 F.3d 621, 624 (D.C. Cir. 1997)).

In Re Tate

63 F. Supp. 961 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 21, 1946

On a writ of habeas corpus this court has no jurisdiction to review the action of the Board on the merits, as the granting or revocation of parole is entirely within its sound discretion, Jones v. … In Escoe v.

Matter of McGough

605 A.2d 605 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1992

See United States v. McGough, No. Cr. 90-301A (E.D.Va. Jan. 18, 1991). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently affirmed all fourteen convictions. United States v. … Before respondent had been convicted, the Board recommended that we suspend respondent from the practice of law for six months.

Money Station, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Banc One Corporation, Intervenors

94 F.3d 658 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 1996

94 F.3d 658 320 U.S.App.D.C. 324 MONEY STATION, INC., Petitioner, v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, Respondent. Banc One Corporation, et al., Intervenors. Nos. 95-1182, 95-1243.