Case law

South Louisiana Grain Services, Inc. v. Bergland

463 F. Supp. 783 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 1978

Nixon v. Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. 425, 468 , 97 S.Ct. 2777, 2803 , 53 L.Ed.2d 867, 907 (1977). … In short, while the Bill of Attainder Clause serves as an important “bulwark against tyranny,” United States v.

Norman v. United States

20 App. D.C. 494 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1902

, wilfully, and with malice aforethought did kill and murder the said Annie Brown. … Coffin v. United States, 162 U. S. 664 . Moreover, the instruction numbered three was simply a variation in language, and not in substance, of the instructions numbered one and two granted on behalf of the defendant.

In re Murdter

131 A.3d 355 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 2016

XI, § 9(h)(1); Board Rule 13.7. … BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY v By: /TRB/ Thomas R. Bundy, III Dated: February 24, 2015 All members of the Board concur in this Report and Recommendation, except Jason E.

Dingwall v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority

766 A.2d 974 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 2001

In Simmons v. District of Columbia Armory Bd., 656 A.2d 1155 (D.C.1995) (per curiam), the plaintiff purported to bring an action against the District of Columbia Armory Board. … As with the Housing Authority in Braxton [v. Nat’l Capital Rous. Awth., 396 A.2d 215, 217 (D.C.1978) ], Congress has not authorized the Armory Board to be sued. Id. at 1157.

In Re Abrams

662 A.2d 867 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 1995

See also Brown v. Walker, 161 U.S. 591, 599 , 16 S.Ct. 644, 647 , 40 L.Ed. 819 (1896) (the recipient of a pardon "stands with respect to such offence as if it had never been committed”); Armstrong v. … See Lee v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review, 423 A.2d 210 , 216 n. 13 (D.C.1980). 27 . An early federal decision anticipated Williston's position.

Hot Shoppes, Inc. v. Clouser

231 F. Supp. 825 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 1964

Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 68 App.D.C. 282, 287 , 96 F.2d 554, 559 (1938), specifically applied to decisions of the Board of Zoning Adjustment, Robey v. … Generally, remand to the Board for further proceedings is appropriate, Robey v. Schwab, supra; Hyman v.

United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Florida MacHine & Foundry Company and Fleco Corporation

441 F.2d 1005 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 4, 1970

P 11,328 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … N.L.R.B. v.

Rodriguez v. Shulman

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 21, 2012

This immunity has traditionally been extended to members of boards of law examiners or of boards that have the power to revoke attorneys’ licenses. See, e.g., Simons v. Bellinger, 643 F.2d 774, 799 (D.C. … Kaempfer v. Brown, 872 F.2d 496, 496 (D.C. Cir. 1989). Failing to follow these steps can lead to the injunction being vacated. See, e.g., Richardson v. District of Columbia, 2008 WL 2396186, at *1 (D.C. Cir.

Smith v. United States

561 A.2d 468 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1989

Streater v. United States, 478 A.2d 1055, 1058 (D.C.1984). We therefore may review his claim only for plain error. See Brown v. United States, 289 A.2d 891, 893 (D.C.1972). … See Dumas v.

United States ex rel. Thomson v. Custis

35 App. D.C. 247 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 10, 1910

Rep. 231; Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U. S. 505 , 47 L. ed. 563, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 390; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11 , 49 L. ed. 643, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 358, 3 A. & E. Ann. Cas. 765; New York ex rel. Lieberman v. … Reetz v. Michigan, and Dent v. West Virginia, supra.

United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.

270 F.R.D. 26 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 14, 2010

The first motion was jointly filed by defendants Halliburton Company, Kellogg Brown and Root, Inc., Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., KBR Technical Services Inc., Kellogg Brown & Root Engineering Corporation, Kellogg … Brown & Root International, Inc.

In Re Morris

495 A.2d 1162 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 1985

V. … Grievance Com'n of Md. v.

In Re Richardson

602 A.2d 179 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1992

The Florida Bar v. … BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY By: Francis D. Carter Francis D. Carter Date: July 26, 1991 All members of the Board concur in the foregoing Report and Recommendation. 1 . The Florida Bar v.

In Re Gilchrist

488 A.2d 1354 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1985

Bar Counsel cited Attorney Grievance Commission v. … The Board concurred in that conclusion and neither party opposed it. 2 .

Willens v. 2720 Wisconsin Avenue Cooperative Ass'n

844 A.2d 1126 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 2004

“[T]he board owes its duty of loyalty to the cooperative — that is, it must act for the benefit of the residents collectively.” Levandusky v. One Fifth Ave. … Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 812 (Del.1984).

United States v. Hawkins

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 3, 2013

DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. … Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge DATE: October 3, 2013

Barry v. Holderbaum

454 A.2d 1328 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1982

Review is properly in the Superior Court, see Money v. … Kegley v. District of Columbia, D.C.App., 440 A.2d 1013, 1019 (1982).

In Re Slattery

767 A.2d 203 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 2001

Relying on United States v. … We were encouraged in this reading of Ruffalo by the Court’s citation to Bouie v.

Deutsche Goed-Und Sieber-Scheideanstalt v. Commissioner of Patents

251 F. Supp. 624 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 8, 1966

Reynolds v. Aghnides, 356 F.2d 367 (D.C.Cir. 1966). Judge Smith’s dissenting opinion in Druey cites with approval the decision of Judge Letts in Parker v. … While Parker v. Marzall was not specifically cited, its rationale was applied in the recent decision of this Court in Union Carbide Corporation v.

Cornish v. District of Columbia

67 F. Supp. 3d 345 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 2014

Bowden v. United States, 106 F.3d 433, 437 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (citing Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. Cir. 1985)). … In support, she relies principally on Brown v. Bronx Cross Cnty. Med. Grp., 834 F.