Case law

Hudmon v. Slaughter

70 Ala. 546 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1881

Lewis v. Commissioners, 22 Amer. Rep. 275 (s. c., 16 Kan. 102 ); Kister v. Cameron, 39 Ind. 488 , supra. In the case of the Attorney-General v. … —State v. State Canvassers, 36 Wis. 498 ; Phelps v. Schroeder, 26 Ohio St. 549 .

Standard Cooperage Co. v. Grant

217 Ala. 667 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 10, 1928

BROWN, J. This appeal is prosecuted by J. A. … McDonald v. McMahon’s Adm’r, 66 Ala. 115 ; Loring v. Grummon et al., 176 Ala. 236 , 57 So. 818 ; Visible Measure Gasoline Dispenser Go. v. McCarty Drug Co., 206 Ala. 588 , 91 So. 383 . Reversed and remanded.

Alabama High School Athletic Ass'n v. Rose

446 So. 2d 1 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 6, 1984

DECISION In Scott v. … See Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association, et al. v. Cox, et al. , [221] Tenn. [164], 425 S.W.2d 597 ; Morrison v. Roberts , 183 Okla. 359 , 82 P.2d 1023 ; Robinson v.

Meeks v. State

434 So. 2d 836 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jun 29, 1982

arrest and the confession so that *842 the confession is “ ‘ “sufficiently an act of free will to purge the primary taint.” ’ Brown v. … Under the decisions in Brown v. Illinois, Dunaway v. New York, and Taylor v. Alabama, evidence of the confession should not have been admitted at his trial. Under Crews v.

Eisenberg v. Stein

222 Ala. 576 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 12, 1931

Sections 7427, 7431, Code; People’s Bank of Red Level v. Barrow & Wiggins, 208 Ala. 433 , 94 So. 600 ; Steele v. Brown, 70 Ala. 235 ; King v. King, 61 Ala. 479, 481 ; Tilley v. … X, and SAYRE and BROWN, XT., concur.

Ala. State Pers. Bd. v. Palmore (Ex Parte Palmore)

273 So. 3d 816 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 14, 2018

Horsley v. Horsley , 291 Ala. 782 , 280 So.2d 155 (1973). WRIT DENIED. Stuart, C.J., and Shaw, Wise, and Sellers, JJ., concur.

Ledlow v. State

221 Ala. 511 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 20, 1930

State, 124 Ala. 14 , 26 So. 976 ; Brown v. State, 109 Ala. 70 , 20 So. 103 . When the oral charge is considered as a whole, there is no reversible error presented as to the exceptions reserved. … J., and SAYRE and BROWN, JJ., concur. 1 220 Ala. 601 .

Goodyear Rubber Co. v. George D. Scott Co.

96 Ala. 439 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1892

In Corey v. … A sale so made would, in effect, be making himself a preferred creditor of an insolvent corporation, and a director, or member of the governing board, is without authority to do that. Corey v.

Underwood v. State

439 So. 2d 125 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 30, 1983

While Alabama law has recognized the right of a plaintiff to test a rule or regulation of an administrative board which carries with it the power of law or authority for enforcement (see Gibbs v. … Smith v. Alabama Dry Dock Shipbuilding Co., supra; State ex rel. Baxley v. Johnson, supra; City of Mobile v. Scott , 278 Ala. 388 , 178 So.2d 545 (1965). APPEAL DISMISSED.

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sullivan Timber Co.

126 Ala. 95 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1899

Hannon, 87 Ala. 277 ; Marx Bros. v. Leinkauff, 83 Ala. 453 ; A. G. S. R. R. Co. v. Hill, Ib. 514; Brown v. Master, 104 Ala. 464 . In the cases of Calhoun v. Hannon and Marx Bros. v. … Co. v. Hill and Brown v. Master, and properly so. Had they been *104 connected Iby the conjunction “and” instead of “or,,r they would not have vitiated the charges in those cases.

Government & Civic Employees Organizing Committee, CIO v. Windsor

262 Ala. 285 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 10, 1955

Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdory, 246 Ala. 1 , 18 So.2d 810 . … Congress of Industrial Organizations v. City of Dallas, Tex.Civ.App., 198 S.W.2d 143 ; Perez v. Board of Police Com’rs of City of Los Angeles, 78 Cal.App.2d 638 , 178 P.2d 537 .

Gilbert v. Wilson

237 Ala. 645 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 30, 1939

Jordan, 170 Ala. 530 , 54 So. 280 ; Stafford v. Colonial Mortgage & Bond Co., 221 Ala. 636 , 130 So. 383 ; Brown v. Supreme Lodge, K.P., 225 Ala. 114 , 142 So. 388 . … J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

MEDICAL CLINIC BD., ETC. v. Smelley

408 So. 2d 1203 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 2, 1981

Smelley argues that Medical Clinic Board has no standing to raise these issues, basing this argument on such cases as Tullis v. Blue, 216 Ala. 577 , 114 So. 185 (1927), and Otts v. … Ford v. Ward, 272 Ala. 235 , 130 So.2d 380 (1961); see also Gibson v. Anderson, 265 Ala. 553 , 92 So.2d 692 (1956). Medical Clinic Board argues that the provision that Mr.

Thorington v. Gould

59 Ala. 461 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1877

—Heath v. State, 36 Ala. 273 ; Williamson v. Woolf, 37 Ala. 298 . … —Inge v. Murphy, 10 Ala. 885; Sydney v. White, 12 Ala. 728 .

Farrior v. New England Mortgage Security Co.

92 Ala. 176 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1890

The author cites, with other cases to sustain the text, the case of Geddes v. Brown, supra. … The case of Bibb v.

Street v. Nelson

80 Ala. 230 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1885

Betts v. Lee, 5 Johns. 348 ; Curtis v. Groat, 6 Johns. 168 ; Brown v. Sax, 7 Cow. 59 ; Wright v. Guier, 9 Watts, 172 ; Riley v. Boston Water Grower Co., 11 Cush. 11 ; Note to Armory v. Delamivir, 1 Smith’s Lead. … Beatty v. Brown, 76 Ala. 267 ; 1 Smith Lead Ca. 8th Ed. part 2, 704. The present case is not influenced by the principles stated above.

Owens v. SUPERFOS A/S

170 F. Supp. 2d 1188 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Aug 31, 2001

Brown Mach. Works v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 951 F.Supp. 988, 992 (M.D.Ala.1996). In breach of contract actions, Alabama applies the law of the state in which the contract was executed. Id. … Co. v.

Sellers v. State

586 So. 2d 994 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Aug 23, 1991

Generally, habeas corpus is inappropriate as a remedy to review the actions of an administrative board or commission, such as the Board. … See Ellard v.

State ex rel. Brandon v. Prince

199 Ala. 444 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 12, 1917

—Dunn v. Dean, supra; State, ex rel. Vandiver v. … —Brandon v.

Frow & Ferguson v. Downman

11 Ala. 880 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1847

[Brumby v. Langdon, 10 Ala. R. 747; Acts of 1845, p. 136.] … The decision of Brown v. Brown, 5 Ala. B. 508, is direct, to show that a vendor who is released by his vendee, is a competent witness, as well as that the release need not be delivered to the party in person.