Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
7.11s
133 A.D.3d 1333 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 20, 2015
award visitation depends to a great extent upon its assessment of the credibility of the witnesses and upon the assessments of character, temperament, and sincerity of the parents and grandparents” (Matter of Hilgenberg v … given to him by petitioners, and, as explained by petitioners’ expert, the negative impact that continued visitation with respondent could have on the child’s relationship with petitioners (see generally Matter of Ordona v
Cited 5 timesPublished67 N.Y. 160 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1876
Abner Brown alone appealed to the General Term of the Supreme Court, and there the' judgment was affirmed. … It is, therefore, unquestioned that the judgment appealed from cannot be enforced against the estate of Abner Brown.
Cited 11 timesPublished56 N.Y.2d 242 · New York Court of Appeals · May 20, 1982
Ford, 46 NY2d 1021 ; People v Session, 34 NY2d 254 ). … Teen’s affidavit also stated that he never conspired to kill Thomas Wright with Brown or anyone else, and that he never saw Brown until after he (Teen) was arrested.
Cited 51 timesPublished37 N.Y.2d 317 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1975
Aiello v Commissioner of Public Welfare, 358 Mass 91; Rex Investigative & Patrol Agency v Collura, 329 F Supp 696 ; Administrative Hearings—Aid of Counsel, Ann., 33 ALR3d 229, 289.) … (Crowder v Gardner, 249 F Supp 678 ; Ihnen v Celebrezze, 223 F Supp 157 ; Hall v Celebrezze, 217 F Supp 905 .)
Cited 23 timesPublished11 A.D.3d 834 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 28, 2004
v New York City Health & Hosps. … Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744, 746 [1995], quoting Moffatt v Moffatt, 86 AD2d 864 , 864 [1982], affd 62 NY2d 875 [1984]; see McEachron v State Farm Ins.
Cited 13 timesPublished142 A.D.3d 1312 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 30, 2016
We conclude that the court erred in granting a mistrial inasmuch as the jury verdict was not the product of substantial confusion among the jurors (see Martinez v Te, 75 AD3d 1, 6-7 [2010]; Luzardo v Jamaica Hall Corp., 296 … Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 539, 545-546 [1983]; Reynolds v Krebs, 81 AD3d 1269, 1271 [2011]; Fleiss v South Buffalo Ry.
Cited 4 timesPublished2 Denio 375 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1845
Brown & Co. under the circumstances stated in the special verdict became parties to that contract, and were entitled to enforce it by action against the defendants. … Brown & Co. rity of contract between the *377 plaintiffs and the defendants, and agreeing substantially with the positions laid down in the opinion of the supreme court.
Cited 8 timesPublished98 N.Y. 388 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1885
(Reeder v. Sayre, 70 N. Y. 180 ; Harris v. Tumbridge, 83 id. 92.) … In Pease v.
Cited 27 timesPublished24 N.Y.2d 421 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1969
Brown walked away from him and entered a building at 126th Street and came out shortly thereafter and rejoined Mr. Brown. I observed Mr. Brown and that other person come close together. … People v. White, 16 N Y 2d 270), and no misstatements when questioned about observed activity (People v.
Cited 40 timesPublished111 A.D.3d 1385 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 2013
Peay, 77 AD3d 1309, 1310 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 955 [2010]; see People v Heary, 104 AD3d 1208, 1210 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 943 [2013], reconsideration denied 21 NY3d 1016 [2013]; see generally People v Prochilo, 41 … evidence (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]).
Cited 7 timesPublished51 How. Pr. 92 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1875
. — The action, as appears by the body of the complaint, is evidently against the association of which Adam Brown is alleged to be president.
Cited 11 timesPublished8 Johns. 64 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1811
In the case of Poe v. Mendford, (Cro.
Cited 17 timesPublished80 N.Y.2d 998 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1992
In this regard, the court’s scope of review is limited to an assessment of whether there is a rational basis for the administrative determination without disturbing underlying factual determinations (Matter of Pell v Board
Cited 31 timesPublished139 N.Y. 127 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1893
I refer to Doe v. Wood (2 Barnw. & Aid. 724).
Cited 7 timesPublished7 N.Y. 141 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1852
Judgment affirmed. 1 1 See Foster v. Beals, 21 N. Y. 247 ; Kellogg v. Smith, 26 Ibid. 18. … Van Keuren v. Corkins, 66 N. Y. 77 ; s. c. 4 Hun 129 ; Wanzer v. Cary, 12 Ibid. 403 ; s. c. 76 N. Y. 526 . Nor do they apply to a purchaser of the land. Purdy v. Huntington, 46 Barb. 389 ; s. o. 42 N. Y. 334 .
Cited 14 timesPublished54 A.D.2d 585 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 27, 1976
The constitutionality of second offender provisions has long been established (see People v Wilson, 13 NY2d 277 , app dsmd 377 US 925 ; People v Gowasky, 244 NY 451 ). Latham, Acting P.
Cited 8 timesPublished62 A.D.3d 1089 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 14, 2009
Applying the well-settled standards for review regarding legal sufficiency and weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]; see also People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]; People v Hall … Sides, 75 NY2d 822, 824 [1990]; People v Davenport, 58 AD3d 892, 895 [2009]; People v Dunton, 19 AD3d 808, 808-809 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 805 [2005]).
Cited 15 timesPublished144 N.Y. 384 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1895
The question of the competency of adjudicating in foreclosure proceedings upon a dower right has been passed upon in the case of Merchants' Bank v. Thomson ( 55 N. Y. 7 ). … They contain a direct expression of intention and fall readily under the exception mentioned in the cases cited by the appellant of Lewis v. Smith ( 9 N. Y. 511 ), and Konvalinka v. Schlegel (104 id. 125).
Cited 27 timesPublished307 A.D.2d 759 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 3, 2003
properly before us inasmuch as there is no notice of appeal from the original judgment in the record before us, nor is there otherwise any indication in the record that an appeal from that judgment was perfected (see People v … Reddy, 227 AD2d 961 [1996], lv denied 88 NY2d 1024 [1996]; People v Dabbs, 178 AD2d 848 [1991], lv denied 79 NY2d 946 [1992]).
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna