Case law

Brown v. . Miller

108 N.C. 395 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1891

Woodlief v. Harris, 95 N. C., 211 ; Gwathney v. Etheridge, 99 N. C., 571; State v. Logan, 100 N. C., 454 . … Raw lings v. Hunt, 90 N. C., 270 , and cases there cited. The defendants further contend that the bale of cotton in question belonged to Fisher, the landlord, as and for the rent due to him from Patterson.

State v. Brown

168 N.C. App. 408 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 1, 2005

State v. Price

326 N.C. 56 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 7, 1990

See, e.g., State v. Brown, 320 N.C. at 202-03, 358 S.E.2d at 17 . See also South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. at —, 104 L. Ed. 2d at 883 . … In California v. Brown, 479 U.S. 538, 542 , 93 L.

State v. Brown

81 N.C. App. 281 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1986

While the indictments allege that the funds belonged to “Lott-Brown,” they do not allege that defendant is the “Brown” in the firm name. Courts take judicial notice of subjects and facts of common knowledge. Smith v. … The following cases, e.g., are per *286 tinent: Hudson v. State, 408 So. 2d 224 (Fla. App. 1981); State v. Elsbury, 63 Nev. 463 , 175 P. 2d 430 (1946); Patterson v. Bogan, 261 S.C. 87 , 198 S.E. 2d 586 (1973); State v.

Brown v. Long

22 N.C. 138 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1838

In Harrison v. Battle, 1 Dev. Eq. Rep. 537 , Chief Justice Henderson observed, when the question of a Pure debt, arises, it will be time enough to consider whether cannot be reached. … Upon views like these the case of Edgell v. Haywood and Dowe, 3 Atk. 352, was determined by Lord Hardwicke, upon one of the insolvent debtors’ acts, called the Lords’ acts, passed 10 Geo.

State v. Brown

21 N.C. App. 87 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1974

State v. Stokes, 274 N.C. 409 , 163 S.E. 2d 770 . Article I, Sec. 22, N. C. … State v. McIntosh, 260 N. C. 749 , 133 S.E. 2d 652 . Because the trial court did not have jurisdiction, the judgment must be arrested.

Brown v. Ellis

362 N.C. 679 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 2008

State v. Brown

166 N.C. App. 760 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 19, 2004

Brown v. Dodson

359 N.C. 187 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2004

Defs’ (Stephen Page and Buncombe County Board of Education) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA03-954) 2. Pits’ Motion to Dismiss Petition for Discretionary Review 3. Pits’ Conditional PDR 1. Denied (12/02/04) 2.

State v. Brown

358 N.C. 546 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 24, 2004

Brown v. Wilkins

102 N.C. App. 555 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 16, 1991

Atkins v. Moye, 277 N.C. 179 , 176 S.E.2d 789 (1970); Boyd v. Wilson, 269 N.C. 728 , 153 S.E.2d 484 (1967); 9 Strong, N.C. Index 3d, Negligence, § 34, p. 428 (1977). … The Court, citing Powers v.

Harvey v. . Brown

187 N.C. 362 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1924

Cihak v. Klekr, 117 Ill., 643 ; 7 N. E., 111 ; Manufacturers Bank v. Koch, 105 N. Y., 630 ; 12 N. E., 9 ; 1 Jones Evid., sec. 167; Gardom v. Woodward (Kan.), 21 Am. St. Rep., 314 , note (3. c., 25 Pac., 199 ). … Wigmore on Evidence (2 ed.), sec. 661; Wolf v. Arthur, 112 N. C., 692 ; Stanley v. Lumber Co., 184 N. C., 306 ; S. v. Journegan, 185 N. C., 707.

State v. Brown

166 N.C. App. 517 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 5, 2004

State v. Brown

316 N.C. 734 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1986

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 5, 2021

STATE V. … BROWN 2021-NCCOA-531 Opinion of the Court (citing State v.

Hull v. Brown

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 5, 2021

HULL V. … HULL V. BROWN 2021-NCCOA-525 Opinion of the Court Goldston v.

Brown v. . Taylor

173 N.C. 700 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1917

Sondley v. Asheville, 112 N. C., 694 . The plaintiff is allowed twenty days after this opinion is certified to the Superior Court to serve his case on appeal, or exceptions to the defendants’ case.

Brown v. . House

118 N.C. 870 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1896

This case was before us at Spring Term, 1895, and the opinion of the Court rendered at that term ( Brown v. House , 116 N.C. 859 ), is now before us upon a petition to rehear. … And in the case of Literary Board v. Clark , 31 N.C. 58 , Ruffin, C.

Hogan v. . Brown

125 N.C. 251 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1899

Lilly sold the horse to the defendant, Brown, and after the .demand and before the commencement of this action, the defendant had sold it to some other person. … been enacted in many of the States, and they have stood the' test of the courts when they have been attacked as unconstitutional on the ground that they deprive one of his property without due process of law. .......... v.

Brown v. . Conner

32 N.C. 75 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1849

. *78 88, and was so decided in Jones v. Ross, 2 Car. L. R. 335. The jury then were authorized to find the verdict they did, and, upon such finding, the act declares, judgment shall and may be rendered accordingly.