Case law

Federal Trade Commission v. Cockrell

431 F. Supp. 558 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 1977

FTC v. MacArthur, 532 F.2d 1135, 1140 (7th Cir. 1976). The Court agrees with the Commission that the case of FTC v. … See, e. g., FTC v. Browning, supra; FTC v. Sherry, 1969 CCH Trade Cases ¶ 72,906 (D.D.C. 1969).

Knott v. Jackson

31 A.2d 662 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1942

In Brown v. Slocum the question now before us was not involved. … Later in Von Rosen v. Dean, 59 App.D.C. 359 , 41 F.2d 982, 983 , the court paraphrased its language in Brown v.

Bachman v. Collier

73 F.R.D. 300 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 1976

Plaintiff here has made allegations of across-the-board discrimination, while limiting the proposed class to professionals and semi-professionals. … See Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). The Court sees no reason to short-circuit the administrative process in this case. First, the Court notes that Ms.

In Re Abrams

662 A.2d 867 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 1995

See also Brown v. Walker, 161 U.S. 591, 599 , 16 S.Ct. 644, 647 , 40 L.Ed. 819 (1896) (the recipient of a pardon "stands with respect to such offence as if it had never been committed”); Armstrong v. … See Lee v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review, 423 A.2d 210 , 216 n. 13 (D.C.1980). 27 . An early federal decision anticipated Williston's position.

District of Columbia v. C.J. Langenfelder & Son, Inc.

558 A.2d 1155 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 17, 1989

Circuit noted that as of 1974, “not a single court or board of contract appeals had allowed recovery of interest foregone on equity capital as a ‘cost of performance.’” George Hyman Construction Co. v. … In Bell v.

Pascucci v. Town of Lynnfield

330 F. Supp. 3d 648 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2018

This case arises from a property dispute between Michael and Susan Pascucci ("plaintiffs" or "the Pascuccis") and the Town of Lynnfield, Massachusetts and its Board of Selectmen in their official capacities (collectively … Reg'l Planning Comm'n v.

United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.

270 F.R.D. 26 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 14, 2010

The first motion was jointly filed by defendants Halliburton Company, Kellogg Brown and Root, Inc., Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., KBR Technical Services Inc., Kellogg Brown & Root Engineering Corporation, Kellogg … Brown & Root International, Inc.

Edward J. Ellis v. United States

264 F.2d 372 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 1959

neatly” dressed, wearing a “gray topcoat,” sometimes said to have a “half-belt” in the back, or a “black topcoat,” and a “brown” or “gray” hat. … Bell v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 387, 254 F.2d 82, 86 , certiorari denied, 1958, 358 U.S. 885 , 79 S.Ct. 126 , 3 L.Ed.2d 113 . See also Draper v. United States, 1959, 79 S.Ct. 329 .

Parnigoni v. St. Columba's Nursery School

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 2010

Parnigoni that the Board was ‘nervous’ about [Mr. Parnigoni’s] 2004 conviction.” Id. ¶ 20. The Board’s apprehension apparently stemmed from the fact that “Mr. … Lyles v. Micenko, 404 F. Supp. 2d 182, 187 (D.D.C. 2005) (quoting Homan v. Goyal, 711 A.2d 812, 818 (D.C. 1998) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)); see Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 248 (D.C.

Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

225 F. Supp. 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 1964

As was said by Chief Justice Hughes in Home Building & Loan Association v. … The court based its ruling on Thompson v. Whittier, 365 U.S. 465 , 81 S.Ct. 712 , 5 L.Ed.2d 704 , reversing D.C., 185 F.Supp. 306, 307 ; International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union v.

In Re Gilchrist

488 A.2d 1354 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1985

Bar Counsel cited Attorney Grievance Commission v. … The Board concurred in that conclusion and neither party opposed it. 2 .

Gaines v. District of Columbia

961 F. Supp. 2d 218 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2013

From 1998 to 2012, Gaines met, corresponded, or spoke with employees of the District of Columbia Lottery Board (hereinafter “DCLB”) on a number of occasions. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 919 F. Supp. 2d 105, ___ (D.D.C. 2013) (citing EEOC v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial Sch., 117 F.3d 621, 624 (D.C. Cir. 1997)).

Cornish v. District of Columbia

67 F. Supp. 3d 345 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 2014

Bowden v. United States, 106 F.3d 433, 437 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (citing Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. Cir. 1985)). … In support, she relies principally on Brown v. Bronx Cross Cnty. Med. Grp., 834 F.

Reynolds v. Swilly

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 20, 2016

Furthermore, because these constitutional claims were brought or could have been brought in plaintiff’s prior lawsuit, see Reynolds v. Brown, No. 4:15-cv—865, 2015 WL 4077168 (D.S.C. … Brown . . . and Kimberly V. Barr . . . , and Sumter County Solicitor Ernest A. Finney III”), adopted, 2015 WL 4078552 (D.S.C. June 30, 2015), the claims are now barred.

Hot Shoppes, Inc. v. Clouser

231 F. Supp. 825 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 1964

Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 68 App.D.C. 282, 287 , 96 F.2d 554, 559 (1938), specifically applied to decisions of the Board of Zoning Adjustment, Robey v. … Generally, remand to the Board for further proceedings is appropriate, Robey v. Schwab, supra; Hyman v.

National Ass'n of Waterfront Employers v. Chao

587 F. Supp. 2d 90 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2008

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 302-03 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979).

Turner v. Afro-American Newspaper Co.

572 F. Supp. 2d 71 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 20, 2008

Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . Courts strictly observe the 90-day time limit for filing employment discrimination claims, even where a pro se plaintiff is involved. Smith v.

In Re Morris

495 A.2d 1162 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 1985

V. … Grievance Com'n of Md. v.

Money Station, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Banc One Corporation, Intervenors

94 F.3d 658 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 1996

94 F.3d 658 320 U.S.App.D.C. 324 MONEY STATION, INC., Petitioner, v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, Respondent. Banc One Corporation, et al., Intervenors. Nos. 95-1182, 95-1243.

In Re Richardson

602 A.2d 179 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1992

The Florida Bar v. … BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY By: Francis D. Carter Francis D. Carter Date: July 26, 1991 All members of the Board concur in the foregoing Report and Recommendation. 1 . The Florida Bar v.