Case law

Eason v. Spence

232 N.C. 579 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1950

Guy v. Harmon, 204 N.C. 226 , 167 S.E. 796 ; Williams v. Hedrick, 37 C.C.A. 552 , 96 F. 657 ; Rissberger v. Brown, 120 Ky. 142 , 85 S.W. 731 ; City of Louisville v. Kohnhorst, 25 Ky. L. Rep. 532, 76 S.W. 43 ; Falvey v. … Land Co. v. Board of Education, 101 N.C. 35 , 7 S.E. 573 ; Phelps v. Chesson, 34 N.C. 194 .

Edgerton v. . Kirby

156 N.C. 347 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1911

Attorney-General v. Justices of Guilford, 27 N. C., 315 ; Barnes v. Commissioners, 135 N. C., 27 . If W. A. Green was not elected, tbe six members of tbe board must meet and elect a successor to W. A. … Green, and in other respects proceed with tbe business of the board. “A mandamus lies only for one who has a specific legal right, and who is without any other adequate legal remedy.” 1 Chitty Gen. Pr., 790; S. v.

Fuller v. Easley

145 N.C. App. 391 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 2001

App. 741, 747 , 478 S.E.2d 643, 647 (1996) (quoting Branch v. Board of Education, 233 N.C. 623, 625 , 65 S.E.2d 124, 126 (1951)). … Carter v. Stanly County, 125 N.C. App. 628, 632 , 482 S.E.2d 9, 11 (1997); Forbis v. Honeycutt, 301 N.C. 699, 701 , 273 S.E.2d 240, 241 (1981).

Chemimetals Processing, Inc. v. Schrimsher

140 N.C. App. 135 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 19, 2000

Hotel Corp. v. Taylor and, Fletcher v. Foremans Inc., 45 N.C. App. 229, 234 , 262 S.E.2d 869, 873 , rev’d on other grounds, 301 N.C. 200 , 271 S.E.2d 54 (1980). … Sykes v. Keiltex Industries, Inc., 123 N.C.

Hartsfield v. . Craven County

194 N.C. 358 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1927

“An Act Prohibiting the County Board of Education, or the Board of Commissioners for the County of Craven, or Board of Aldermen of the City of New Bern, said County, Pledging the Credit of said County or City, or Issuing … Frazier v. Comrs. of Guilford, arde, 49. Sucb expenditure was not lawful, however, unless authorized by statute. Tate v. Board of Education, 192 N. C., 516.

North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Burnette ex rel. Liptow

131 N.C. App. 840 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 29, 1998

See Veazey v. City of Durham, 231 N.C. 357 , 57 S.E.2d 377 (1950). Because further action is required by the trial court to make it a final judgment, it is interlocutory. N.C. Dept. of Transportation v. Page, 119 N.C. … Liggett Group v. Sunas, 113 N.C. App. 19 , 437 S.E.2d 674 (1993).

Orange County v. Heath

278 N.C. 688 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 12, 1971

See also Raleigh v. Morand, 247 N.C. 363 , 100 S.E. 2d 870 ; Zopfi v. City of Wilmington, 273 N.C. 430 , 160 S.E. 2d 325 ; In re Appeal of Parker, 214 N.C. 51 , 197 S.E. 706; Helms v. … In the case of Freeland v.

Amerson v. Johnston Cty. Bd of Educ.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 29, 2000

Defendant, Johnston County Board of Education, is a State agency and Linda Harris was an employee of the defendant at the time of the alleged negligence. 4. … On 20 April 1998 Sunny Hill Road was part of the regular bus route set by the Johnston County Board of Education. Ms.

Poe v. Atlas-Soundelier/American Trading & Production Core

132 N.C. App. 472 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1999

Brown v. Friday Services, Inc., 119 N.C. App. 753, 759 , 460 S.E.2d 356, 360 , disc. review denied, 342 N.C. 191 , 463 S.E.2d 234 (1995); see also 3 Arthur Larson, Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law § 48.00 (1991). … Brown, 119 N.C. App. at 760 , 460 S.E.2d at 361 .

Rowe v. Walker

114 N.C. App. 36 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1994

Brown & Bunch by Charles Gordon Brown and Scott D. Zimmerman, Chapel Hill, for defendants-appellees. WYNN, Judge. In January 1970 Jack and Martha Chavis owned a 70.06 acre tract of farmland. … See Moore v. Board of Educ. of Iredell County, 212 N.C. 499 , 193 S.E. 732 (1937); Swain County v. Sheppard, 35 N.C.App. 391 , 241 S.E.2d 525 (1978); N.C. Const. art. VII, § 1.

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 2020

At this hearing, the attorney for the Board reasserted that while -3-  STATE V. … (citations omitted)); State v. Knight, 255 N.C.

Durham Provision Co. v. Daves

190 N.C. 7 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 24, 1925

S. v. Garner, 158 N. C., 630 ; S. v. R. R., 141 N. C., 846 ; Kimmish v. Ball, 129 U. S., 217 ; Red "C" Oil Mfg. Co. v. Board of Agriculture, 172 Fed., 695 ; S. c. affirmed, 222 U. S., 380 . … Speaking to a similar question in Board of Education v. Comrs., 174 N.

Northwestern Financial Group, Inc. v. County of Gaston

110 N.C. App. 531 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1993

Board. … However, in Bockweg v.

Nance v. Rowan-Salisbury Bd. of Educ. & (Each Individually & in Their Capacity) Lynn P. Moody

336 F. Supp. 3d 593 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 14, 2018

Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544 , 570, 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) ). … Board.

Hammond v. Saini

367 N.C. 607 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 2014

board or medical staff of the hospital or sys- tem. … N.C.G.S. § 131E-76(5)(c); see also Shelton v.

Teare v. . White

4 N.C. 210 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1815

"And now at this day, that is to say, on 26 October, until which day the plea aforesaid was continued, comes the said Peterson Brown, by William H. … NOTE. — Upon the first point, see Morgan v.

State v. Monroe

27 N.C. App. 405 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1975

Brown concerning defendant’s oral confession. After extensive voir dire examination in which Sgt. Brown, Detective Todd, and defendant testified, the trial judge made findings of fact that on 23 November 1974 Sgt. … Although such a writing was necessary under former G.S. 7A-457 (a) to show waiver by an indigent defendant of his right to be represented by counsel, State v.

News & Observer Publishing Co. v. Wake County Hospital System, Inc.

55 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1981

Most notably, in Coats v. … In Moberly v.

Wentz v. Piedmont Land Co.

193 N.C. 32 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 12, 1927

In Seip v. Wright, 173 N. … Cab Co. v. Creasman, 185 N. C., p. 556; Johnson v. Jones, 186 N. C., p. 235; Plott v. Comrs., 187 N. C., p. 125; Brinkley v. Norman, 190 N. C., p. 851. In Hurwitz v. Sand Co., 189 N.

State v. Blackwell

135 N.C. App. 729 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1999

State v. … Motor Co. v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 35 N.C.App. 536, 538 , 241 S.E.2d 727, 729 (1978). Typically, relief is either specific performance of the plea agreement or withdrawal of the plea itself (i.e. rescission).