Case law

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 19, 2005

Background Of The Statutory Duties Of The Oklahoma Board Of Dentistry ¶ 1 The Oklahoma Board of Dentistry ("Board") was created by the Legislature pursuant to Article V , Section 39 of the Oklahoma Constitution. … V.

Mike v. PROFESSIONAL CLINICAL LABORATORY, INC.

781 F. Supp. 2d 1192 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 16, 2011

V. … (citing Atherton v.

Jarboe v. First National Bank of Pryor

658 P.2d 470 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 1983

In Brown v. … To the cases cited in Brown, supra, in support of the views therein expressed, may be added Ettinger v.

Huffaker v. Town of Fairfax

115 Okla. 73 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 1925

Smith, Ark., v. … Co. v. Vance, 74 Okla. 261 , 180 Pac. 693 .

Poke v. State

515 P.2d 252 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1973

The Tenth Circuit in Lamb v. … It is clear that the Federal constitution does not compel in every case the retroactivity of a “new” constitutional ruling such as that announced in Lamb v. Brown. See Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.

Opinion No. 76-236 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 1976

The Oklahoma Supreme Court in Lutes v. Thompson, 193 Okl. 331 , 143 P.2d 135 (1943) said: "Construction and maintenance of county highways falls within the statutory duties of county commissioners. … (Citing Hines v. Carroll, 186 Okl. 555 , 99 P.2d 113 1940 .)

Opinion No. 78-168 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 1978

At what point in time would such member cease to be a voting member of the Board? … In the case of Coyle v. Smith, 28 Okl. 121 , 113 P. 944 (1911), the Oklahoma Supreme Court construed Article XXIII, Section 10.

Todd v. Lansdown

747 P.2d 312 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1987

As the United States Supreme Court stated in Brown v. … See Brown, supra, 432 U.S. at 167-68 , 97 S.Ct. at 2226-27 . Accordingly, the greater offense is by definition the “same” for purposes of double jeopardy as any lesser offense included in it.

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 16, 1985

Jackson v. Ind. School District No. 16 of Payne County , 648 P.2d 26 (Okla. 1982). … See , generally, Marley v. Cannon , 618 P.2d 401 (Okla. 1980).

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 2, 1988

City of Tulsa v. Smittle, 702 P.2d 367 (Okla. 1985). … Section 2 and Article V , Section 5 of the Oklahoma Constitution.

St. Louis San Francisco R. Co. v. Caldwell

75 Okla. 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 15, 1919

The excise board of Choctaw county for the year ending June 30, 1916, made a levy for current expenses for the county and other municipalities situated therein, as follows, to wit: Choctaw county, 4.46 mills; Peter, Everidge … Co. v.

Kelly v. Citizens Farmers Nat. Bank

174 Okla. 380 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1935

See Wells v. Patton, 33 P. 15 ; Abercrombie v. Abercrombie, 67 P. 539 ; Feight v. Wyandt, 99 P. 611 . … Cantrell, Mart Brown, and Stephen Chandler in the preparation of this opinion.

American Insurance Ass'n v. State Industrial Commission

745 P.2d 737 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 1987

See Westinghouse Elec. v. Grand River Dam Auth., Okl., 720 P.2d 713, 720 [1986]. 8 . Greer County Election Board v. Elliott, 26 Okl. 546 , 109 P. 731, 732 [1910]; Webb v. … State Board of Education, 190 Okl. 556 , 126 P.2d 241, 242 [1942] and Ritchie v. Raines, Okl.Cr., 374 P.2d 772, 775-776 [1962], 10 .

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 1, 1994

JACKSON V. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 16 OF PAYNE CO., 648 P.2D 26 (OKLA.1982). THE LEGISLATIVE INTENT IS TO BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE WHOLE ACT IN LIGHT OF ITS GENERAL PURPOSE AND OBJECT. MIDWEST CITY V. … UDALL V. UDALL, 613 P.2D 742 (OKLA.1980). CONSTRUCTIONS WHICH WOULD LEAD TO ABSURDITY ARE TO BE AVOIDED; RATHER, THE LANGUAGE IS TO BE READ IN A RATIONAL MANNER. CITY OF NORMAN V. LIDELL, 596 P.2D 879 (OKLA.1979).

Harper v. Young

852 P.2d 164 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 11, 1993

Conditional Supervision Program (PPCS), pursuant to 57 O.S.1991, § 365; that he violated no rules or conditions of the PPCS; but was nonetheless removed from the program without due process requirements set forth in Morrissey v. … We need not go through a complete discussion of Petitioner’s due process complaint, as it is not dispositive of the issue before us and is fully addressed in Barnett v. Moon, 852 P.2d 161 , 64 OBJ 1281 (Okl.Cr.1993).

Opinion No. (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 26, 1979

If the school board voted to allow the media to attend the meeting, would the board be liable if the press were in attendance at the meeting and reported the proceedings ? … Munley v. ISC Financial House, Inc., Okl. 584 P.2d 1336 (1978).

Haynes v. Caporal

571 P.2d 430 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 1977

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Central Liquor Co., Okl., 421 P.2d 244 (1966). The Central Liquor, Co. decision found language of § 536 to be plain and unambiguous with its meaning clear and unmistakable. … Barlow v. Jones, 37 Ariz. 396 , 294 P. 1106 .’ ”

Burgess v. Bryant

505 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 6, 1980

Crosswhite v. Brown, 424 F.2d 495 (Tenth Cir. 1970); Wright v. St John’s Hospital, 414 F.Supp. 1202 (N.D.Okla.1976); Seibert v. McCracken, 387 F.Supp. 275 (E.D. Okla.1974). … See Crosswhite v. Brown, supra; Seibert v. McCracken, supra.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 26, 1979

If the school board voted to allow the media to attend the meeting, would the board be liable if the press were in attendance at the meeting and reported the proceedings? … Munley v. ISC Financial House, Inc., Okla. 584 P.2d 1336 (1978).

In Re Initiative Petition No. 27 of Oklahoma City

74 O.B.A.J. 3490 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 2003

(Board) would be convened. … Brazell v. Zeigler, 1910 OK 193 , 110 P. 1052 ; Fite v. Lacey, 1984 OK 83, ¶ 16 , 691 P.2d 901, 904 ; See Okla. Const. art. XVIII, § 4(a).