Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.26s
Holland v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF UNIV. OF D. OF COL.
794 F. Supp. 420 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 18, 1992
Milton v. … Car-Mar Construction Corp. v. Skinner, 777 F.Supp. 50 , 57 n. 6 (D.D.C.1991); Frazier v. University of the District of Columbia, 742 F.Supp. 28, 29 (D.D.C.1990); Newman v.
Cited 12 timesPublished762 A.2d 530 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 2000
The Florida Bar v. Clement, 662 So.2d 690, 700 (Fla.1995); accord, People v. Reynolds, supra note 13, 933 P.2d at 1305; State Bar Ass’n v. … . *540 To paraphrase and adapt to this case the reasoning of the Supreme Court of Colorado in People v.
Cited 12 timesPublished935 A.2d 1086 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 2007
Co. v. Brown, 817 A.2d 806, 809 (D.C.2003); see also Beard, supra note 3, 790 A.2d at 546. … Montgomery v. Jimmy’s Tire & Auto Ctr., 566 A.2d 1025, 1029 (D.C.1989). See also Williams v. Board of Trustees of Mount Jezreel Baptist Church, 589 A.2d 901, 911 (D.C.1991); King v. King, 579 A.2d 659, 666 (D.C.1990).
Cited 3 timesPublishedBanner Heart Hospital v. Burwell
201 F. Supp. 3d 131 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 19, 2016
Defendant cannot now justify the Board’s decision on an entirely different rationale than the one that the Board itself offered. See Citizens to Pres. Overton Park, Inc. v. … Hosp. v. Leavitt, 539 F.
Cited 9 timesPublishedUniversity Of Texas M.D. Ander v. Kathleen Sebelius
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 17, 2011
See Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984). … In prior proceedings with other hospitals, moreover, the Board had not required an express showing of the net financial impact of the different drugs. See Belmont Hills Hospital v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCustomers Parking, Inc. v. District of Columbia
562 A.2d 651 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 18, 1989
If “aggrieved” for any reason, the taxpayer must appeal within the permitted time to the Board of Equalization and Review. District of Columbia v. … Partnership v.
Cited 20 timesPublished363 F.2d 702 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 1966
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Aero Corporation, Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Co. v.
Cited 16 timesPublished533 F.2d 683 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 4, 1976
NLRB v. Local 164, IBEW, 388 F.2d 105 , 108 (3d Cir. 1968); see NLRB v. … Enterprise Ass’n, Local 638 v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedEquinox Holdings, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
883 F.3d 935 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 2018
Micronesia Corp. v. NLRB, 219 F.3d 661, 665-66 (D.C. … See Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers v. NLRB, 736 F.2d 1559, 1564 (D.C. Cir. 1984).
Cited 1 timesPublished839 F.2d 809 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 1, 1988
NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD, et al. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., Appellant, Deborah K. Boller, et al. v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD, et al. Nos. 87-5092, 87-5093 and 87-5176. … BRAC v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedUnited States v. Alvin Gaskins
690 F.3d 569 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 14, 2012
In United States v. … And in United States v.
Cited 25 timesPublishedFederal Trade Commission v. Surescripts, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2023
In support, Surescripts cites Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209 (1993). … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 (1962).
Cited 0 timesPublishedAli Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United States
840 F.3d 757 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 20, 2016
See Al Bahlul v. United States, 767 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (en banc). … Six judges—Judges Henderson, Brown, Griffith, Kavanaugh, Millett, and Wilkins— have voted to affirm. Three judges— Judges Rogers, Tatel, and Pillard—dis-sent.
Cited 29 timesPublishedBasiliko v. Government of the District of Columbia
283 A.2d 816 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1971
The facts are as follows: In June 1968 the Board of Condemnation for Insanitary Buildings (hereinafter called the Board) inspected a house at 1101 46th Street, N. … Kunzig, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 98 , 433 F.2d 1204 (1970), cert. denied, National Industries for Blind v. Ballerina Pen Co., 401 U.S. 950 , 951 S.Ct. 1186 , 28 L.Ed.2d 234 (1971), and in Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedGomillion v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
447 A.2d 449 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1982
Temporaries Inc. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 304 A.2d 14, 17 (1973). … Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, supra. See also Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516, 518 (1973).
Cited 25 timesPublished277 A.2d 650 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 28, 1971
Local Union, 346 U.S. 485 , 74 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed. 228 (1953) and Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board, 353 U.S. 1 , 77 S.Ct. 598 , 1 L.Ed.2d 601 (1957). … See also N.L.R.B. v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg.
Cited 12 timesPublishedFederal Trade Commission v. Surescripts, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 24, 2023
In support, Surescripts cites Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209 (1993). … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 (1962).
Cited 0 timesPublished18 App. D.C. 142 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 1901
Hisey v. Peters, 6 App. D. C. 68, 71; Hien v. Buhoup, 11 App. D. C. 293; Glenn v. Adams, 12 App. D. C. 175, 178; Esty v. Newton, 14 App. D. C. 50, 53. … Warner v. Smith, 13 App. D. C. 111, 115; Traver v. Brown, 14 App. D. C. 34, 41; Esty v. Newton, 14 App. D. C. 50, 54; Fefel v. Stocker, 17 App. D. C. 317; Reichenbach v. Kelley, idem, 333; Beals v. Finkenbiner, 12 App.
Cited 0 timesPublished579 A.2d 190 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1990
See also People v. … Comm’n v. Nisbett, 316 Md. 464 , 560 A.2d 18 (1989); Waysman v.
Cited 234 timesPublishedEdward J. Ellis v. United States
264 F.2d 372 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 1959
neatly” dressed, wearing a “gray topcoat,” sometimes said to have a “half-belt” in the back, or a “black topcoat,” and a “brown” or “gray” hat. … Bell v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 387, 254 F.2d 82, 86 , certiorari denied, 1958, 358 U.S. 885 , 79 S.Ct. 126 , 3 L.Ed.2d 113 . See also Draper v. United States, 1959, 79 S.Ct. 329 .
Cited 26 timesPublished
Ask Donna