Case law

Empire Clothing Co. v. Roberts, Johnson & Rand Shoe Co.

16 Ala. App. 86 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 15, 1917

BROWN, B. J. [1] This is an action on the common counts for goods, wares, and merchandise sold by the plaintiff to the defendant, and was commenced on the 9th day of September, 1913. … Brown v. Bamberger, Bloom & Co., 110 Ala. 342 , 20 South. 114 ; First National Bank of Anniston v.

House v. State

36 Ala. App. 550 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 1952

The condenser on the still was leaking and Brown carried an automobile radiator converted for use as a condenser. … State, 24 Ala.App. 217 , 133 So. 63 ; Jackson v. State, 23 Ala. App. 555 , 129 So. 306 . The mere presence of a person at a still is not a violation of the law. Biddle v. State, 19 Ala.App. 563 , 99 So. 59 ; Hudson v.

American Ins. Co. v. Inzer

216 Ala. 553 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 13, 1927

Ætna Co. v. Kennedy, 161 Ala. 600 , 50 So. 73 , 135 Am. St. Rep. 160 ; Brown v. Com. Ins. Co., 86 Ala. 189 , 5 So. 500 . … SOMERVILLE, THOMAS, and BROWN, JX, concur.

Garmon v. Liberty Life Assur. Co. of Boston

385 F. Supp. 2d 1184 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Nov 24, 2004

v. … Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., 898 F.2d 1556, 1563 (11th Cir.1990).

Ala. State Tenure Com'n v. Phenix C. Bd. Etc.

467 So. 2d 263 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Mar 13, 1985

Howell v. Alabama State Tenure Commission , 402 So.2d 1041 (Ala.Civ.App. 1981); Sumter County Board of Education v. Alabama State Tenure Commission , 352 So.2d 1137 (Ala. 1977). … State Tenure Commission v. Pike County Board of Education , 349 So.2d 1173 (Ala.Civ.App. 1977). Mr.

First Nat. Bank of Union Springs v. Ratley

223 Ala. 455 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 15, 1931

Paden & Co. v. Bellenger & Ralls, 87 Ala. 575 , 6 So. 351 ; Fields v. Karter, 121 Ala. 329 , 25 So. 800 ; Sims v. United Auto Supply Co., 221 Ala. 383 (8), 129 So. 53 . … Smith v. Fields, 79 Ala. 335 . In Woods v.

Ingram v. Alabama Peace Officers' Standards & Training Commission

148 So. 3d 1089 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Feb 14, 2014

After a hearing before the Alabama State Personnel Board (“the board”), the board upheld the department’s decision to terminate Sutley’s employment. Id. … name the board should be vacated.

Hagan v. Riddle Co.

209 Ala. 606 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 9, 1923

Redd Bros. v. Todd (Ala. … Powell v. Gray, 1 Ala. 77 ; Monroe v. Brady, 7 Ala. 59 , 1 C. J. §§ 313, 315, 325, et seq., pp. 1123, 1128.

Sullivan v. H & M Industrial Services, Inc.

127 So. 3d 1202 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Nov 16, 2012

In Stephens v. … Brown.’ Stephens’s brief, p. 13.

Fields v. State Ex Rel. Jones

534 So. 2d 615 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Oct 28, 1987

Alabama State Tenure Commission v. Mountain Brook Board of Education , 343 So.2d 522 (Ala. 1977). … In reaching this determination, the court was restricted "to a review of the action of the Board upon the record before the Board." Barnes v. State ex rel. Ferguson , 274 Ala. 705 , 151 So.2d 619 (1963).

Echols v. State ex rel. Dunbar

56 Ala. 131 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1876

In the case of the State of Missouri, ex rel. v. Fitzgerald, 44 Mo. 425, the question was, whether the board of councilmen of the city of St. … In Gass v.

Priest v. Griffin

284 Ala. 97 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 10, 1969

We said in Nelson v. … Quoted with approval in City of Mobile et al. v. Sorrell, 271 Ala. 468 , 124 So.2d 463 , is a statement appearing in Brackett v.

Roddy v. United Transportation Union

479 F. Supp. 57 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Apr 19, 1979

Under its constitution the Board has been created as a subordinate board jointly consisting of the 13 locals in Alabama affiliated with UTU. … It seems clear that the representatives of the 13 Alabama locals comprise the “executive board or similar governing body” of the Board, and it is undisputed that express provisions of UTU’s constitution and the Board’s by-laws

Shiver v. Butler County Bd. of Educ.

797 So. 2d 1086 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Dec 15, 2000

Hamilton Motor Co. v. Cooner, [ 254 Ala. 422 , 47 So.2d 270 (1950)]; Southern Cement Co. v. Patterson, 271 Ala. 128 , 122 So.2d 386 [(1960) ]; McElhaney v. … Courts should not *1093 seek to control the broad discretion given to such boards by the legislature unless the party challenging board actions clearly shows plain error. See Clark v.

Cooner v. Alabama State Bar

59 So. 3d 29 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 8, 2010

Noojin v. Alabama State Bar, 577 So.2d 420, 423 (Ala.1990), citing Hunt v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar, 381 So.2d 52 (Ala.1980).” Davis v. Alabama State Bar, 676 So.2d 306, 308 (Ala.1996). … In Kirby v.

Alabama v. Acacia Mut. Life Ass'n

3 F.2d 697 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jul 1, 1925

P., v. Mims, 241 U. S. 574 , 36 S. Ct. 702 , 60 L. Ed. 1179 , L. R. A. 1916F, 919; Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. U. S. Shipping Board, 258 U. S. 549 , 42 S. Ct. 386 , 66 L. Ed. 762 ; Supreme Lodge, K. P., v. … A. 280 ; Porter v. U. S. Shipping Board (D. C.) 284 F. 397 ; Atlantic Corporation v. U. S. Shipping Board (D. C.) 286 F. 222 ; Canary Oil Co. v. Standard Asphalt Co. (C. C.) 182 F. 663 .

Hail v. Regency Terrace Owners Ass'n

782 So. 2d 1271 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 27, 2000

Management of the building was the responsibility of the Association, which is governed by a board of directors and elected officers. … See, also, Calvert v. Casualty Reciprocal Exch. Ins. Co., 523 So.2d 361 (Ala. 1988); Nettles v. Henderson, 510 So.2d 212 (Ala.1987); Wilson v. Brown, 496 So.2d 756 (Ala.1986).

Jordan v. Jordan

717 So. 2d 822 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jun 12, 1998

Therefore, this court remanded the case for 21 days for entry of an order in compliance with Brown v. Whitaker Contracting Corp., 681 So.2d 226 (Ala.Civ.App.1996). … The trial court was expressly directed to comply with the procedures established in Brown , but both of its cursory orders on remand fall short of what Brown requires.

Rudulph v. Brewer

96 Ala. 189 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1892

In the case of Boit v. … The court ruled properly in refusing to allow the witness Holmes to testify “that Brown [one of the payees of the note], while in the possession of the note, had stated to witness that he, Brown, had tried to sell the note

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Key

46 Ala. App. 303 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Nov 18, 1970

Foster v. Shepherd, 269 Ala. 94 , 110 So.2d 894 ; Water Works and Sewer Board of Fairhope v. Brown, 268 Ala. 96 , 105 So.2d 71 ; and Aldridge v. Seaborn, 253 Ala. 603 , 46 So.2d 424 . … Berry v.