Case law

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Whitt

167 Okla. 261 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1933

A similar question was presented to and considered by the Supreme Court of Kansas in the case of Robertson v. Board of Commissioners of Labette County et al., 252 P. 196 . … Board of Commissioners, supra.

Opinion No. (2010)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 17, 2010

Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16 , 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). … [And it] may be budgeted and expended by the Construction Industries Board."

Asher v. State

546 P.2d 1343 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1976

See, Simon v. … In the case of Fryar v.

Cahill-Swift Mfg. Co. v. Sayer

72 Okla. 88 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1918

A similar question was presented to the Supreme Court of Washington in the case of Statson-Post Mill Co. v. Brown, 21 Wash. 619 , 59 Pac. 507 , 75 Am. St. … Ed. 855 ; Walker v. Brown, 165 U. S. 654, 664 , 17 Sup. Ct. 453, 41 L. Ed. 865 ; Connolly v. Bouck, 174 Fed. 312 , 98 C. C. A. 184 .

Fox v. Sedan Consolidated School District No. 9

187 Okla. 425 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1940

See Koch v. Harris, 117 Okla. 172 , 245 P. 848 . The sufficiency of such petition is a question of fact to. be determined in the first instance by the district board. … J.,' WELCH, V. C. J., and HURST, DAVISON, and DANNER, JJ., concur. RILEY, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., absent.

Keokuk v. Ulam

4 Okla. 5 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1896

(Code of Civil Procedure, ch. 66, §§ 3907, 3908; Fellows v. Blacksmith, 19, How. 366; Pkap-wah-asb-kum v. Sims, 8 Fed. Rep. 740; Wau-pe-nea v qua v. Aldrich, 28 Fed Rep. 489; Swartzel et al. v. … Rogers, 3 Kan. 372 ; Wiley v. Keokuk, 6 Kan. 94 ; Wiley v. Mans-to-wab, 6 Kan. 111 ; Lowry v. Weaver, 4 McLean, 82 ; Const, of U. S. Art. 1, Sec. 2; Elk v. Wilkins, 112, U. S. 112.)

Town of Covington v. Coberly

136 Okla. 20 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1929

The town was divided into three wards, but the county election board had designated only two election precincts in said town. … (Albright et al. v. Erickson, 23 Okla. 544 , 102 Pac. 112 .) The appeal is therefore dismissed. TEEHEE, HERR, DIFFENDAFFER, and HALL, Commissioners, concur. SWINDALL, J., not participating.

Maud Oil & Gas Co. v. Bodkin

75 Okla. 6 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1919

The case is briefed and appears to have been tried on the theory that because of the presence of the surrender clause in the lease the lessor had the right to terminate the lease at will, and Brown et al. v. … The trial court followed this decision, but since the trial of the cause the rule announced in Brown v. Wilson has been overruled by Rich v.

Dougherty-Nichols Construction Co. v. Town of Jenks

115 Okla. 104 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1924

, township board, school district board or any member or members of the aforesaid commissioners, or of any of the above named boards, to make any contract for, incur, acknowledge, approve, allow or authorize any indebtedness … No authorities are cited in support of this contention, and it seems to be contrary to the rule announced by this court in tile case of Board of County Commissioners of Washita County v.

Pinnacle Design, Inc. v. Buchanan

66 O.B.A.J. 1254 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1995

First Nat’l Bank and Trust Co. v. Kissee, 859 P.2d 502 (Okla.1993). … Our supreme court has held, however, that exhaustion of remedies before a county equalization board is not required before a party may proceed under section 2871. Independent School Dist. No. 9 v.

Manning v. STATE EX REL. DPS

71 P.3d 527 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 2003

MANNING, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Defendant/Appellant. No. 98,622. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2. February 18, 2003. … Abdoo v. State ex rel. Dept. of Pub. Safety, 1990 OK CIV APP 2 , ¶ 11, 788 P.2d 1389, 1393 . ¶ 5 The material facts presented here are not in dispute and therefore this case presents a question of law. Thomas v.

Wolfenbarger v. Hennessee

520 P.2d 809 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1974

Board of Examiners of Veterinary Medicine v. Mohr, 485 P.2d 235 (Okl.1971); State ex rel. Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Myers, 466 P.2d 640 (Okl.1970); State v. Guardian Funeral Home, 429 P.2d 732 (Okl.1967). … Klafter v. State Board of Examiners of Architects, 259 Ill. 15 , 102 N.E. 193 (1913).

State Ex Rel. White v. Beeler

327 P.2d 664 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1958

In Koch v. … CORN, V. C. J., and DAVISON, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS and JACKSON, JJ.„ concur. WELCH, C. J., and BLACKBIRD, J.„ dissent.

Opinion No. 71-446 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 1972

As stated by the court in Allen v. … Board of Commissioners of Pittsburg County, 28 Okl. 773 , 116 P. 175 : "It is a settled rule that the grants of powers to boards of county commissioners must be strictly construed, because when acting under special authority

Harrill v. Henderson

60 Okla. 22 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1916

\V. Henderson of Stidham, Okla., as principal, and Robert Sexton of Stidham and Y. E. … Louis v. Sickles, 52 Mo. 122 ; 37 Am. Dig. p. 2016. In Lowe v.

Velharticky v. Independent School District No. 3 of Roger Mills County

846 F. Supp. 941 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 17, 1993

In Hicks v. … In Harlow v.

Youngblood v. Incorporated Town of Wewoka

95 Okla. 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 17, 1923

Doctors Oil Co. v. Adair, 83 Okla. 53 , 200 Pac. 858 : Teter v. Board of Education, 85 Okla. 16 , 204 Pac. 129 ; Drummond v. City of Ada, 86 Okla. 200 , 206 Pac. 200 ; Atkins v. Page, 86 Okla. 290 , 208 Pac. 824 . … Teter v. Board of Education; Drummond v. City of Ada, supra. Under the facts in this case, and the foregoing authorities, the motion to dismiss is sustained. Appeal dismissed. JOHNSON, C.

Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

156 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1932

Treas., v. Blaine, 149 Okla. 153 , 300 P. 369 ; McMahan v. … Lindhard, 149 Okla. 161 , 300 P. 378 ; Protest of Trimble, 151 Okla. 74 , 300 P. 406 , and Adjustment Realty Co. v. Excise Board of Muskogee County, 149 Okla. 70 , 299 P. 207 .

Bailey v. Indepentdent School Dist. No.I-29 of Cleaveland County, Oklahoma

256 P.3d 57 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 2011

Kadah v. United States, 600 F.Supp. 1302, 1308 (N.D.N.Y.1985). 14 . Kadah v. United States, 600 F.Supp at 1308, see note 13, supra. 15 . Slodov v. … Harrington v. United States, 504 F.2d 1306, 1312 (1st Cir.1974); Adams v. United States, 504 F.2d 73, 75 (7th Cir 1974); Pacific National Insurance Co. v.

Bates v. State

96 Okla. Crim. 202 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1952

It would not have been necessary for the officers to have inquired what was in the car if they had known the lugs on the front seat wrapped in heavy brown paper actually contained whiskey. … Morris v. State, 66 Okla. Cr. 384 , 92 P. 2d 609 ; Leary v. State, 61 Okla. Cr. 298 , 67 P. 2d 972 ; Wallace v. State, 49 Okla. Cr. 281 , 294 P. 198 ; Coffey v. State, 38 Okla. Cr. 91 ,. 258 P. 923 ; Whitford v.