Case law

Voter Intergrity Project NC, Inc. v. Wake Cnty. Bd. of Elections

301 F. Supp. 3d 612 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 21, 2017

See Bellitto v. Snipes , 221 F.Supp.3d 1354 , 1360-62 (S.D. … Civil Rights Union v. Martinez-Rivera , 166 F.Supp.3d 779 , 791-93 (W.D.

State v. . Litteral

227 N.C. 527 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1947

They returned to the bus stop and the three girls boarded a bus about 11:05 p.m. to go home. Prosecutrix lived about 100 yards beyond the end of the run of this bus where it turned around and returned to town. … S. v. Wilson , 218 N.C. 556 , 11 S.E.2d 567 ; S. v. Perry , 225 N.C. 174 ; S. v. Bishop , 73 N.C. 44 ; S. v. Brown , 204 N.C. 392 , 168 S.E. 532 ; S. v. Noland , 204 N.C. 329 , 168 S.E. 412 ; S. v.

Miller v. Henderson

71 N.C. App. 366 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1984

The Beaufort County Board of Education is a corporate body which has a legal existence separate and apart from its members. See G.S. 115C-40; Edwards v. … Board of Education, 235 N.C. 345 , 70 S.E. 2d 170 *371 (1952); McLaughlin v. Beasley, 250 N.C. 221 , 108 S.E. 2d 226 (1959).

Geiger v. Guilford College Community Volunteer Firemen's Ass'n

668 F. Supp. 492 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 25, 1987

Accordingly, in Brown v. Southern Ry. … N.C.G.S. § 97-10.2(e) represents a codification of the Brown holding. See Leonard, 309 N.C. at 101 , 305 S.E.2d at 535 .

McNabb v. North Carolina

156 F. Supp. 2d 546 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 26, 2001

Brown, 215 F.3d 1320 (table), 2000 WL 691436 , *4 (4th Cir.2000) *549 (quoting Celotex, 477 U.S. at 327 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 ). II. … This argument is meritless, for not only does the Eleventh Amendment bar citizens from bringing such suits against the States in federal court, see e.g., Board of Trustees of Univ. *551 of Ala. v.

GUILFORD COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT v. Simmons

102 N.C. App. 325 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1991

In Durham County v. Addison, 262 N.C. 280 , 136 S.E.2d 600 (1964), the defendant appealed to the Board of Adjustment for a variance after he had been denied a building permit. … Our Courts have consistently required litigants aggrieved by decisions of Boards of Adjustment to seek relief as mandated by statute. See City of Hickory v. Catawba Valley Machinery Co., 39 N.C.

Nance v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

177 N.C. 313 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 1919

Co. v. Moffitt, 157 N. C., 568 ; Hendricks v. Ireland, 162 N. C., 523 ; Sigmon v. Shell, 165 N. C., 582 . And also to a demurrer in pleading. Caho v. R. R. Co., 147 N. C., 23 ; Hay v. Collins, 118 Ga., 243 ; Sloan v. S. … There was no special provision for better board or accommodations.

Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. Tar River Lumber Co.

221 N.C. 89 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 18, 1942

E., 305 ; Tinker v. Rice Motors, 198 N. C., 73 , 150 S. E., 701 ; Brown v. Coal Co., 208 N. C., 50 , 178 S. E., 858 ; Schoenith, Inc., v. Mfg. Co., 220 N. C., 390 , 17 S. E. (2d), 350 ; Bangle v. Webb, 220 N. … Brown, 1 Canada, 360, relied upon by creditor, findings of fact as to authoritative communication are lacking.

Wake Radiology Services, LLC v. North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services

365 N.C. 340 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 25, 2011

717 S.E.2d 376 (2011) WAKE RADIOLOGY SERVICES, LLC d/b/a Wake Radiology Northwest Raleigh Office v. … Browning, Raleigh, for Pinnacle Health Services of North Carolina, LLC.

Erwin v. Myers Park Country Club, Inc.

2021 NCBC 45 · North Carolina Business Court · Jul 27, 2021

See, e.g., Cooke v. … Miller v. First Bank, 206 N.C.

Froneberger v. Yadkin County Schools

630 F. Supp. 291 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 13, 1986

Carlile v. South Routt Sch. … See generally Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); Lovelace v. Sherwin-Williams Co., 681 F.2d 230 (4th Cir.1982).

State v. Solomon

117 N.C. App. 701 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 1995

However, in Dowling v. … State v.

Hylton v. Town of Mount Airy

227 N.C. 622 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1947

Vestal v. Machine Co., 219 N. C., 468 , 14 S. E. (2d), 427 ; Manning v. Ins. Co., ante, 251. If the judgment be supported by the facts it will be affirmed. Rader v. Coach Co., 225 N. C., 537 , 35 S. E. (2d), 609 . … See Boyden v. Achenbach, 79 N. C., 539 ; Wright v. Lake Waccamaw, 200 N. C., 616 , 158 S. E., 99 , and cases cited.

Ali

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 21, 2026

Defendant North Carolina State Board of Elections filed a motion to dismiss on February 5, 2026 [DE 11]. However, plaintiff subsequently filed an amended complaint, [DE 26], rendering that motion moot. Fawzy v. … v. Dep t of Educ., 639 F.3d 91. 108 (4th Cir. 2011).

Den Ex Dem. Gwyn v. Wellborn

18 N.C. 313 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1835

Orrell v. Maddox, Runnington on Ejectment, Appendix 1. Doe ex dem. Cook v. Danvers, 7 East, Rep. 299. … In the case of Farmer on dem. of Earl v.

Brittain v. . Dickson

104 N.C. 547 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1889

Gaither v. Sain , 91 N. C, 304; Smith v. Brown, 99 N. C., 377 . … Badger v. Jones, 66 N. C., 305 ; Latham v. Bell, 69 N. C., 135 ; Smith v. Brown, supra; Lilly v. Wooley, 94 N. C., 412 .

Bynum v. Second Ward High School Mecklenbug County School Board

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 25, 2019

He names the Second Ward High School Mecklenburg County School Board and the “Staff of Second Ward” as Defendants. … Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327-28 (1989). Furthermore, a pro se complaint must be construed liberally. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972).

In re Briggs

135 N.C. 118 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1904

. *123 In Brown v. Walker, 161 U. S., 591 , Congress bad, under the intimation in Counselman v. … The same view is expressed in Brown v. Walker, 161 U.

Schulze v. Meritor Automotive

163 F. Supp. 2d 599 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 30, 2000

Brown interviewed plaintiff, who said that she and Wells were Mends and that they were not having an affair. … Raley v. Board of St. Mary’s County Comm’rs, 752 F.Supp. 1272, 1281 (D.Md.1990).

Kirkman v. . Hodgin

151 N.C. 588 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1909

Brown v. Ray, 32 N. C., pp. 73 and 74; Sherrill v. Hogan, 92 N. C., 345 . Tbe findings of tbe referee show that tbe parties to this agreement, being desirous of making a division of tbe estate of W. L. … Howell v. Howell, 29 N. C., 491 . As said by Mr.