Case law

In re Wilde

68 A.3d 749 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 2013

Garvey v. … See Bata v.

In re Blackwell

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 2026

Blackwell asserts that the Board committed errors of law and that its findings are not supported by substantial evidence, but he does not develop this argument, see Comford v. … We agree with the Board that the Hearing Committee was within its discretion in quashing both subpoenas. Cf. Russell v.

Sousa v. United States

400 A.2d 1036 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1979

As they left the restaurant they encountered the decedent Johnnie Battle, Armón Allen, and Joseph Brown (the “Battle group”). … Brown began running towards Wisconsin and Fessenden where he saw Allen.

In Re Gil

656 A.2d 303 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1995

See Skeeter v. … See United States v. Baish, 460 A.2d 38, 40-41 (D.C.1983).

Braxton v. United States

852 A.2d 941 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 2004

D.C.Code § 16-705(c); [Thalia] Brown v. United States, 818 A.2d 179, 184 (D.C.2003). … United States v. [Warren] Brown, 262 U.S.App. D.C. 183, 189, 823 F.2d 591, 597 (1987).

Burton v. United States

657 A.2d 741 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1994

Katz v. … In Florida v.

Marriott at Wardman Park v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

85 A.3d 1272 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 2014

The Board remanded the case to the ALJ, concluding that the ALJ had not properly assessed Gorham‟s work capacity and 2 See D.C. Code § 32-1508 (3)(V)(iii) (2012 Repl.) … Our standard of review mirrors that which the Board is bound to apply. See Marriott Int’l v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs.,  10 834 A.2d 882, 885-86 (D.C. 2003).

Karath v. Generalis

277 A.2d 650 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 28, 1971

Local Union, 346 U.S. 485 , 74 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed. 228 (1953) and Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board, 353 U.S. 1 , 77 S.Ct. 598 , 1 L.Ed.2d 601 (1957). … See also N.L.R.B. v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg.

Stuart M. Reed v. Railroad Retirement Board

107 F.3d 923 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 27, 1997

REED, Petitioner, v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. No. 96-1117. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Jan. 27, 1997. Before: SILBERMAN, SENTELLE, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges. … These omissions are inconsistent with reasoned decisionmaking and oblige us to remand to the Board for further explanation.

Robert Gray v. United States

311 F.2d 126 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 29, 1962

In contrast, in Contee v. … Within the hour police went with *127 Brown to the home of Gray’s mother and made the arrest.

Branch 6000, National Association of Letter Carriers (United States Postal Service, West Islip, New York) v. National Labor Relations Board

595 F.2d 808 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 19, 1979

Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., 424 U.S. 554, 564 , 96 S.Ct. 1048 , 47 L.Ed.2d 231 (1976); Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171, 177 , 87 S.Ct. 903 , 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967); Ford Motor Co. v. … See also Barton Grands, Ltd. v. N. L. R. B., 529 F.2d 793 (7th Cir. 1976); Gainey v. Brotherhood of Railway Steamship Clerks, 313 F.2d 318 , 324 (3d Cir. 1963); Ferro v.

United States v. Gregory Harley

990 F.2d 1340 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 20, 1993

United States v. … In United States v.

Local 742, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. National Labor Relations Board, J. L. Simmons Company, Intervenor

533 F.2d 683 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 4, 1976

NLRB v. Local 164, IBEW, 388 F.2d 105 , 108 (3d Cir. 1968); see NLRB v. … Enterprise Ass’n, Local 638 v.

Compton v. Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.

80 F. Supp. 3d 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2015

Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305, 317 (1988). … See generally Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 300 (1955); see also Cobell v. Norton, 240 F.3d 1081, 1108 (D.C.

Adair v. England

183 F. Supp. 2d 31 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 2002

See Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel Vill. Sch. Dist. v. Grumet, 512 U.S. 687 , 114 S.Ct. 2481 , 129 L.Ed.2d 546 (1994). The second line of cases began with Larson v. … Brown v. Glines, 444 U.S. 348 , 100 S.Ct. 594 , 62 L.Ed.2d 540 (1980)).

Hotel Employees Local No. 255 v. Leedom

147 F. Supp. 306 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 1957

The United Electrical Radio & Machine Workers, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 178 , 211 F.2d 36 ; see also DePratter v. Farmer, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 74 , 232 F.2d 74 , Fay v. Douds, 2 Cir., 172 F.2d 720 , and Leedom v. … B. v.

Alfonso J. Torre v. Marion Barry, Jr., Individually and as Mayor of the District of Columbia

661 F.2d 1371 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1981

Board of Education, 436 F.Supp. 129, 133 (N.D. Ohio 1977). *1374 The situation of federal employees covered by section 717 of Title VII is different. … Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1969 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976).

Ward v. Kennard

133 F. Supp. 2d 54 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 24, 2001

See Brown v. General Serv. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). The Court’s holding in Brown is clear and well-settled, and the D.C. Circuit has applied it on numerous occasions. … [T]he Federal Circuit is the only Court of Appeals with jurisdiction to review an appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board .... ” See United States v.

In Re Hutchinson

518 A.2d 995 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1986

See M.A.P. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310, 312 (D.C.1971). The Board argues that the controlling case here is In re Wild, 361 A.2d 182 (D.C.1976). … We agree with the Board and decline to follow Cook . V It is therefore ORDERED that respondent, James D.

Barry v. Bush

581 A.2d 308 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 1990

Assoc. of Firefighters v. Cleveland, 478 U.S. 501, 515-24 , 106 S.Ct. 3063, 3071-76 , 92 L.Ed.2d 405 (1986); Berger v. Heckler, 771 F.2d 1556, 1568 (2d Cir.1985); see also D.D. v. … (Title V.) The Mayor and the City Council would be limited with respect to the budget of the Board of Education, however.