Case law

Northeast Oklahoma Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. State ex rel. Corporation Commission

62 O.B.A.J. 938 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1991

that a “final contract” had been executed between GRDA and the Board. … Westingkouse Elec. v. Grand River Dam Auth., supra note 7 at 720; Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan Auth., supra note 6 at 315-316; Peppers Refining Co. v.

State Ex Rel. White v. Beeler

327 P.2d 664 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1958

In Koch v. … CORN, V. C. J., and DAVISON, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS and JACKSON, JJ.„ concur. WELCH, C. J., and BLACKBIRD, J.„ dissent.

BENCH v. STATE

2018 OK CR 31 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 4, 2018

Williams v. State , 1982 OK CR 107, ¶¶ 14-17 , 648 P.2d 843, 845 ; Brown v. State , 1963 OK CR 67, ¶¶ 14, 22-27 , 384 P.2d 54, 59-61 ; Marks v. State , 1951 OK CR 145 , 237 P.2d 459, 461 . … STATE Discussed 2006 OK CR 8 , 134 P.3d 816 , BROWNING v. STATE Discussed 2006 OK CR 34 , 142 P.3d 437 , CODDINGTON v. STATE Cited 2006 OK CR 40 , 144 P.3d 838 , WARNER v.

Opinion No. (1987) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 1987

IN TULSA CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION V. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 601 P.2d 99 (OKL. 1979), THE SUPREME COURT DISCUSSED THE HEARING PROCEDURE BEFORE THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION. … IN THAT CASE, THE SUPREME COURT FOUND THAT IN HEARINGS BEFORE THE STATE BOARD, THE BOARD WAS SUBJECT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT, TO THE EXTENT THAT ACT DID NOT CONFLICT WITH SPECIFIC STATUTES.

Lodwick Lumber Co. v. E. A. Butt Lumber Co.

35 Okla. 797 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1913

Co. v. R. C. … Y.] 516; Rice v. Churchill, 2 Denio [N. Y.] 145; Wilmouth v. Patton, 2 Bibb [Ky.] 280; Sousely v. Burns, 10 Bush [Ky.] 87.

Harris v. State

167 P.3d 438 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 20, 2007

Browning v. State, 2006 OK CR 37 , 144 P.3d 155, 156 ; Davis v. State, 2005 OK CR 21 , 123 P.3d 243, 244 . 7 . 22 0.S.Supp.2004, § 1089(D)(4)(b)(1). 8 . 22 0.$. … Browning, 144 P.3d at 158 (Court cannot reach alleged trial errors on post-conviction if errors were not raised in post-conviction claims). 29 . Al-Mosawi v.

Opinion No. 73-271 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 22, 1973

See also Lairmore v. Board of Commissioners of Okmulgee County, 200 Okl. 436 , 195 P.2d 762 and Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 278 P. 311 . … See also Board of County Commissioners of the County of Tulsa v. Guaranty Loan and Investment Corporation of Tulsa, Inc., 497 P.2d 423 .

Town of Nichols Hills v. Aderhold

207 Okla. 396 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1952

Atteberry v. Aulick, 204 Okla. 540 , 231 P. 2d 993 ; Bartlett v. Lashley, 204 Okla. 299 , 229 P. 2d 185 ; Davenport v. Board of Education, 204 Okla. 356 , 230 P. 2d 271 ; Freeman v. … In Tibbets & Pleasant, Inc., v.

Opinion No. 71-446 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 1972

As stated by the court in Allen v. … Board of Commissioners of Pittsburg County, 28 Okl. 773 , 116 P. 175 : "It is a settled rule that the grants of powers to boards of county commissioners must be strictly construed, because when acting under special authority

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 7, 1988

See, Vette v. Childers, 228 P. 145 (Okla. 1924); Veterans of Foreign Wars v. Childers, 171 P.2d 618 (Okla. 1946). … Isaacs v. Oklahoma City, 437 P.2d 229 , 233 (Okla. 1967); A.G. Opin. No. 83-189. In this case, the Legislature has set forth detailed guidelines that are mandatory in nature and must be adhered to by the Board.

Al-Mosawi v. State

67 O.B.A.J. 3638 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1996

First, he complains that the admission of a 911 audiotape was hearsay and served to *284 bolster the testimony of witness Michelle Brown. Brown made the 911 call. … See Brown v. State, 506 P.2d 1396, 1399 (Okl.Cr.1973). We find no merit in this proposition. IV. SECOND STAGE ISSUES A.

Bailey v. Indepentdent School Dist. No.I-29 of Cleaveland County, Oklahoma

256 P.3d 57 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 2011

Kadah v. United States, 600 F.Supp. 1302, 1308 (N.D.N.Y.1985). 14 . Kadah v. United States, 600 F.Supp at 1308, see note 13, supra. 15 . Slodov v. … Harrington v. United States, 504 F.2d 1306, 1312 (1st Cir.1974); Adams v. United States, 504 F.2d 73, 75 (7th Cir 1974); Pacific National Insurance Co. v.

Opinion No. 70-182 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 14, 1970

Title 59 O.S. 45 .8 [ 59-45.8 ] (1961), sets out the powers and duties of the Board and provides in pertinent part: "The Board shall have the power: . . . … In the case of Oklahoma Tax Commission v.

Blinn v. Hassman

162 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1933

The judicial powers theretofore conferred upon the board of commissioners to determine matters involved in an appeal to that board were not conferred upon the council or board of councilmen. … OULLISON, V. O. J., and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, BAY-DESS, and WELCH, .I.T., concur. BUSBY, J., absent.

V. S. Cook Lumber Co. v. Harris

180 Okla. 557 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1937

Co. v. … Brown, 68 Mo.

Opinion No. 71-281 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 17, 1971

BOARD OF PHARMACY — RETAIL DRUGSTORE LICENSE FEES The Board of Pharmacy of the State of Oklahoma is not required to issue a regular retail drugstore license to federal, state, county and city welfare departments; to federal … State ex rel Ogden v. Hunt, Okl., 286 P.2d 1088 .

Keokuk v. Ulam

4 Okla. 5 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1896

(Code of Civil Procedure, ch. 66, §§ 3907, 3908; Fellows v. Blacksmith, 19, How. 366; Pkap-wah-asb-kum v. Sims, 8 Fed. Rep. 740; Wau-pe-nea v qua v. Aldrich, 28 Fed Rep. 489; Swartzel et al. v. … Rogers, 3 Kan. 372 ; Wiley v. Keokuk, 6 Kan. 94 ; Wiley v. Mans-to-wab, 6 Kan. 111 ; Lowry v. Weaver, 4 McLean, 82 ; Const, of U. S. Art. 1, Sec. 2; Elk v. Wilkins, 112, U. S. 112.)

Youngblood v. Incorporated Town of Wewoka

95 Okla. 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 17, 1923

Doctors Oil Co. v. Adair, 83 Okla. 53 , 200 Pac. 858 : Teter v. Board of Education, 85 Okla. 16 , 204 Pac. 129 ; Drummond v. City of Ada, 86 Okla. 200 , 206 Pac. 200 ; Atkins v. Page, 86 Okla. 290 , 208 Pac. 824 . … Teter v. Board of Education; Drummond v. City of Ada, supra. Under the facts in this case, and the foregoing authorities, the motion to dismiss is sustained. Appeal dismissed. JOHNSON, C.

Glossip v. State

157 P.3d 143 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 2007

In Pink v. … In Lanning v.

McMasters v. Town of Byars

203 Okla. 498 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1950

of any town, board of education, township board, school district board or any member or members of the aforesaid commissioners, or of any of the above named boards, to make any contract for, incur, acknowledge, approve, … In Coppedge et al. v.