Case law

The City of Asheville v. Frost

253 N.C. App. 258 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 2, 2017

Quality Built Homes Inc. v. … Knight v. Town of Knightdale , 164 N.C.App. 766 , 769, 596 S.E.2d 881 , 884 (2004) (quoting State v. Lee , 277 N.C. 242 , 244, 176 S.E.2d 772 , 774 (1970) ).

State v. Francis

261 N.C. 358 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1964

Levine v. Lacy, 130 S.E. 2d 443 (Va.); Hopson v. North American Insurance Company, 233 P. 2d 799 , 25 A.L.R. 2d 1040 (Idaho); State of Louisiana v. … .); Bean v. Clark, 85 So. 2d 588 (Miss.); Consolidated Underwriters v. McCauley, 320 S.W. 2d 60 (Texas); Lowe v. Jacobs, 243 Fed. 432 ; Adair Pipeline Company v. Pipeliners Local Union No. 798, 203 F. Supp. 434 .

Cook v. Atlantic Industrial Constructors

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 22, 1998

Brown, an orthopedic surgeon, and indicated that he did not recall any specific trauma. He never advised Dr. … G.S. § 97-2 (6); Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Company , 233 N.C. 372 , 64 S.E.2d 265 (1951). 2. Plaintiff is not entitled to benefits under the Workers' Compensation Act for his back condition.

Burden v. Dunson

2016 NCBC 33 · North Carolina Business Court · Apr 27, 2016

Burden v. Dunson, 2016 NCBC 33. … IV and V. 7 Const. and By-Laws, Art. V. 8 Pursuant to DGAF's Constitution and By-Laws, the National President is elected by the national membership, while all other national officers are appointed by the DGAF Board.

State v. Solomon

117 N.C. App. 701 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 1995

However, in Dowling v. … State v.

State v. . Wilkerson

98 N.C. 696 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1887

, and in the name of the board, and received by the defendant. … Abernathy v. Phifer, 84 N. C., 711 . There is no error, and the judgment must be affirmed. Affirmed.

Community Projects for Students, Inc. v. Wilder

60 N.C. App. 182 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1982

Keith v. Henderson County, 204 N.C. 21 , 167 S.E. 481 (1933); compare O’Grady v. Bank, 296 N.C. 212 , 250 S.E. 2d 587 (1978). … Defendant Board of Education alone had authority to ratify the sale of plaintiffs goods to the school and, therefore, plaintiffs theory of ratification is of no avail to it in this action. See Equipment Co. v.

Jones (Griffin) v. Rochelle

125 N.C. App. 82 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1997

Board of Transportation on 2 February, 1990. The sign was not a regulatory sign, wherein a failure to obey the sign is a violation of the traffic law. *87 In Davis v. Jessup and Carroll v. … State v. Brown, 280 N.C. 588, 597 , 187 S.E.2d 85, 91 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 870 , 34 L. Ed. 2d 121 (1972).

Morris v. Thomas

161 N.C. App. 680 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 16, 2003

Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons’ Farms, Inc., 140 N.C. App. 390, 395 , 537 S.E.2d 248, 253 (2000). See Stewart v. Kopp, 118 N.C. … McKinney v. Richitelli, 357 N.C. 483, 487 , 586 S.E.2d 258, 262 (2003) (citing Utilities Comm. v. Edmisten, Atty. General, 291 N.C. 451 , 232 S.E.2d 184 (1977)).

Duke v. State ex rel. Shaw

247 N.C. 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1957

Stedman v. Winston-Salem, 204 N.C. 203 , *239 167 S.E. 813 ; Powell v. Maxwell, 210 N.C. 211 , 186 S.E. 326 ; Hinson v. Lott, 8 Wall 148, 19 L. ed. 387; Ward v. Maryland, 12 Wall 418, 20 L. ed. 449. … Board of State Tax Comrs., 184 N.C. 499, 115 , S.E. 336; Goldsmith v. United States Board of Tax Appeals, 270 U.S. 117 , 70 L. ed. 494; 42 Am. Jur. 590 .

State v. Pierce

346 N.C. 471 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 24, 1997

Agent Brown’s interview with defendant began at 11:17 a.m. and lasted until 12:45 p.m. Brown did not readvise defendant of his rights before taking defendant’s statement. … Agent Brown testified that defendant told Brown that defendant smacked the victim ten times during the three-week period prior to Tabitha’s death.

State v. Williams

725 S.E.2d 7 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 2012

State v. Largent, 197 N.C.App. 614, 617 , 677 S.E.2d 514, 517 (2009) (quoting In Re Proposed Assessments v. Jefferson-Pilot, 161 N.C.App. 558, 559-60 , 589 S.E.2d 179, 180-81 (2003)). … Here, the Board did not give notice of appeal and did not raise an alternative basis in law. In CDC Pineville, LLC v.

State v. Jones

53 N.C. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 1981

In State v. Brown and State v. … We realize that our opinion in the case sub judice is inconsistent with State v. Brown, supra. We believe the trend in the *471 cases decided by our Supreme Court is such that Brown no longer. governs.

Pope v. Davidson Cnty.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 7, 2023

POPE V. … POPE V.

Multimedia Publishing of North Carolina, Inc. v. Henderson County

145 N.C. App. 365 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 2001

Publishing Co. v. Board of Education, 29 N.C. App. 37, 47 , 223 S.E.2d 580, 587 (1976). This is so notwithstanding the countervailing policy favoring confidentiality between attorneys and clients. … Fisher v. Maricopa County Stadium Dist., 912 P.2d 1345, 1353 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995) ....

Brittain v. . Dickson

104 N.C. 547 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1889

Gaither v. Sain , 91 N. C, 304; Smith v. Brown, 99 N. C., 377 . … Badger v. Jones, 66 N. C., 305 ; Latham v. Bell, 69 N. C., 135 ; Smith v. Brown, supra; Lilly v. Wooley, 94 N. C., 412 .

Lee v. Walker

234 N.C. 687 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1952

Kennedy v. Williams, 87 N.C. 6 ; Stewart v. Frink, 94 N.C. 487 ; S. v. Long, 94 N.C. 896 ; S. v. Fisher, 117 N.C. 733 , 23 S.E. 158 ; Sugg v. Greenville, supra; Wittson v. Dowling, supra; Irwin v. Charlotte, supra; R. … In Mebane v.

Guthrie v. Summit Molded Products Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 28, 1995

Plaintiff claims that Coaling Little and Butch Brown told her they were too busy to help her by opening the mold on November 29 or 30, 1993, but Mr. Brown and Mr. … Anderson v. Lincoln Constr. Co. , 265 N.C. 431 , 144 S.E.2d 272 (1965). 2.

Kerr v. Hicks.

131 N.C. 90 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1902

This is true (Jones v. Beaman, 117 N. … That Judge Brown erred in permitting plaintiffs to file *94 exceptions to the referee’s report at February Term, 1894.

In re Briggs

135 N.C. 118 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1904

. *123 In Brown v. Walker, 161 U. S., 591 , Congress bad, under the intimation in Counselman v. … The same view is expressed in Brown v. Walker, 161 U.