Case law

Smith v. Woodhollow Apartments

463 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1978

See Tatum v. Myrick, 425 F.Supp. 809 (M.D.Fla.1977); Sumlin v. Brown, 420 F.Supp. 78 (N.D.Fla.1976); Brown v. Blake & Bane, Inc., 402 F.Supp. 621 (E.D.Va.1975); Young v. … See Logan v. Richard E. Carmack & Associates, 368 F.Supp. 121 (E.D.Tenn.1973); Brown v. Ballas, 331 F.Supp. 1033 (N.D.Tex.1971).

Town of Covington v. Coberly

136 Okla. 20 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1929

The town was divided into three wards, but the county election board had designated only two election precincts in said town. … (Albright et al. v. Erickson, 23 Okla. 544 , 102 Pac. 112 .) The appeal is therefore dismissed. TEEHEE, HERR, DIFFENDAFFER, and HALL, Commissioners, concur. SWINDALL, J., not participating.

In Re Magnolia Petroleum Co.

138 Okla. 205 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1929

Lillard v. Meisberger, 113 Okla. 228 , 240 Pac. 1067 . The act requires this court to set t'he cause for hearing after conditions performed. … LESTER, V. O. J., and HUNT, CLARK, HEFNER, OULLISON, and SWINDALL, JJ., concur. MASON, O. J., and RILEY, J., absent.

Opinion No. (2010)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 17, 2010

Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16 , 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). … [And it] may be budgeted and expended by the Construction Industries Board."

Pinnacle Design, Inc. v. Buchanan

66 O.B.A.J. 1254 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1995

First Nat’l Bank and Trust Co. v. Kissee, 859 P.2d 502 (Okla.1993). … Our supreme court has held, however, that exhaustion of remedies before a county equalization board is not required before a party may proceed under section 2871. Independent School Dist. No. 9 v.

Norton v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co.

16 Okla. 482 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1906

as are concerned in the action before us, provided certain regulations fcr the proper performance of such duties, fixed the first Monday in March as the time therefor, and by a later section in the same act, required the board … By act of February 24, 1899, being sec. 5994 of Wilson’s Statutes, a territorial board of equalization is formed, and its sittings fixed to commence on the third Monday in June in each j^ear.

Opinion No. 75-266 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1975

generally follow the rules set forth in Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. … by the Board.

Fite v. State

526 P.2d 956 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 4, 1974

v. … See, Brown v. State, supra, and cases cited therein.

Opinion No. 72-162 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 7, 1972

Home-Stake Production Company v. Board of Equalization of Seminole County, Okl., 416 P.2d 917 (1966). … City of Tulsa v. Midland Valley R. Co., 168 F.2d 252 (10th Cir. 1948). Accordingly, the cases in Oklahoma have consistently adhered to the rule set forth in Tulsa Exposition Fair Corporation v.

Opinion No. 77-154 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 5, 1977

Based on the decision in Farley v. … Likewise, it has been held by this office, based upon Farley v.

Opinion No. 71-275 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 1971

An officer under 51 O.S. 6 [ 51-6 ] (1961), was defined in Sparks v. … Jur. 880 ; Farley v. Board of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 , 162 P. 797 .

Seltzer v. Commissioners of Land Office

258 P.2d 1172 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1953

Donaldson v. Hines, 163 Kan. 300 , 182 P.2d 865 , and Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing Board, 31 Cal.2d 401 , 189 P.2d 17 , 3 A.L.R.2d 90 . … Board of University and School Lands, 21 N.Dak. 212, 129 N.W. 1029 ; State ex rel. White v. Board of State Land Com’rs, 23 Wash. 700 , 63 P. 532 ; U. S. v. Williams, 6 Mont. 379 , 12 P. 851 .

Opinion No. 78-158 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 12, 1978

and regulations of the State Board of Education, governing the board and the school system of the district; to maintain and operate a complete public school system of such character as the board of education shall deem best … In the case of Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Thurman, 121 Okl. 108 , 247 P. 996 (1926), an action was brought by an attorney to recover attorney's fees alleged to be due from the employing board of education.

Ross Ex Rel. Ross v. City of Shawnee

683 P.2d 535 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 1984

In Graves v. Rose, 663 P.2d 733 (Okl.1983), we said, “... notice of a claim for relief must be distinguished from notice of a traffic collision (or other tort).” [emphasis added]. 2. In Johns v. … In Reirdon v. Wilburton Board of Education, 611 P.2d 239 (Okl.1980), we found the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act constitutional. AFFIRMED.

Fox v. Sedan Consolidated School District No. 9

187 Okla. 425 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1940

See Koch v. Harris, 117 Okla. 172 , 245 P. 848 . The sufficiency of such petition is a question of fact to. be determined in the first instance by the district board. … J.,' WELCH, V. C. J., and HURST, DAVISON, and DANNER, JJ., concur. RILEY, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., absent.

Underwriters Land Co. v. Willis

95 Okla. 182 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1923

Associated Employers’ Reciprocal et al. v. State Industrial Commission et al., 83 Okla. 73 , 200 Pac. 862 ; Huttig Lead & Zinc Co. v. Brown, 90 Okla. 80 , 215 Pac. 1056 . … Brown, supra, wherein it was held that the last paragraph of subdivision 3, sec. 7290, Comp.

In Re General Motors Corp." Piston Slap" Prods. Liability Litigation

385 F. Supp. 2d 1181 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 8, 2005

Lee v. … Brown was substituted as the named plaintiff for John Remor on January 20, 2005. 2 .

Opinion No. (1986)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 14, 1986

Shipp v. Southeastern Oklahoma Industries Auth ., 498 P.2d 1395 , 1398 (Okla. 1972). … Board whereby the County Board has assumed responsibility for the city or town's waste, and (3) the agreement authorizes the County Board to exercise such authority.

Phillips v. State

64 Okla. Crim. 454 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 19, 1938

The complaining witness, Milton Brown, did not testify. C. C. … Benson v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 16 , 133 P. 271 ; Noll v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. *458 157, 135 P. 287 ; Owens v. State, 11 Okla. Cr. 113 , 143 P. 204 ; Baldwin v. State, 11 Okla. Cr. 228 , 144 P. 634 ; Jefferson v.

Pryor v. McCafferty

69 Okla. 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1916

The questions raised in these canses are settled by the opinion in Carroll, Brough & Robinson v. … A further discussion here could serve no useful purpose or be of any avail- Huckins Hotel Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County, 64 Okla. 235 , 166 Pac. 1043 .