Case law

Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Continental Trailways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, National Association of Motor Bus Owners, Intervenor

515 F.2d 1010 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 11, 1975

(BNA) 2891 , 169 U.S.App.D.C. 293 AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. CONTINENTAL TRAILWAYS, INC., Petitioner, v. … In Trans World Airlines, Inc. v.

In Re Gregory

574 A.2d 265 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 1990

As part of a general revision of our rules governing solicitation of professional employment, subsection (3) was adopted shortly after the Supreme Court’s decision in Ohralik v. … See also Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Ass’n, 486 U.S. 466, 475 , 108 S.Ct. 1916, 1922 , 100 L.Ed.2d 475 (1988).

Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, , Western Air Lines, Inc., Northwest Airlines, Inc., Pan American World Airways, Inc., Intervenors. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Western Air Lines, Inc., Northwest Airlines, Inc., Intervenors. National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Western Air Lines, Inc., Pan American World Airways, Inc., Northwest Airlines, Inc., Intervenors. American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Pan American World Airways, Inc., Western Air Lines, Inc., Intervenors

561 F.2d 293 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 2, 1977

PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Western Air Lines, Inc., Northwest Airlines, Inc., Intervenors. NATIONAL AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner, v. … No merger was involved in CAB v.

Columbia Plaza Limited Partnership v. Cowles

403 F. Supp. 1337 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 10, 1975

See, e. g., Burbank v. … Brown: A Preemption Analysis, 84 Yale L.J. 1164 , 1167-69 (1975), and cases cited therein.

Dano Resource Recovery, Inc. v. District of Columbia

620 A.2d 1346 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1993

DeVito v. … Co. v.

Ryan v. Dist. of Columbia

306 F. Supp. 3d 334 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 2, 2018

Jones v. District of Columbia , 241 F.Supp.3d 81 , 88 (D.D.C. 2017) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also Allen-Brown v. … unconstitutional exercise of authority delegated to him by the Board); Greensboro Prof'l Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 3157 v.

Daniels v. United States

947 F. Supp. 2d 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 30, 2013

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). A. … did not make certain determinations that it was required by regulation to make and did not “replicate central selection boards . . . to the maximum extent possible” as it was required by regulation to do); Bond v.

Saunders v. White

191 F. Supp. 2d 95 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2002

Regarding selection board composition, the instant case presents the same material facts as Ward v. Caldera. … Thus, Saunders’ claims with respect to the 1996 Board’s decision are clearly not moot. Porter v.

Vasquez v. United States Capitol Police

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2025

In Blackmon-Malloy v. U.S. Capitol Police Board, the D.C. … George, 407 F.3d at 412–13; see also Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1022 (D.C. Cir. 2015).

In Re Bailey

883 A.2d 106 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 2005

Corp. v. District of Columbia, 443 A.2d 29, 33 (D.C.1982)) (internal citation omitted). … See Washington Props., Inc. v.

Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of La. v. United States

577 F. Supp. 2d 382 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2008

The Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of Louisiana (“Tunica”) and the Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. … FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000) (internal quotation and citation omitted).

Rickard v. District of Columbia

214 A.2d 476 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 1965

See Brown v. District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 170 A.2d 925 (1961); Tyrrell v. State, 173 Neb. 859 , 115 N.W.2d 459 (1962); Commonwealth v. Unger, 190 Pa.Super. 43 , 151 A.2d 782 (1959). … Brown v. District of Columbia, sqpra. Affirmed. 1 . D.C.Code 1961, § 40-302 (d). 2 .

P'ship v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

892 F.3d 1256 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 2018

See Fort Dearborn Co. v. NLRB , 827 F.3d 1067 , 1075 (D.C. Cir. 2016). … See, e.g. , Inova Health System v. NLRB , 795 F.3d 68 , 74 (D.C. Cir. 2015).

In Re Chapman

962 A.2d 922 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 2009

Respondent did not appeal from the Board’s Report and Recommendation, but Bar Counsel takes exception to the Board’s recommended sanction. … (citing United States v. Grayson, 438 U.S. 41, 50-54 , 98 S.Ct. 2610 , 57 L.Ed.2d 582 (1978)).

In Re Bereano

719 A.2d 98 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 1998

States District Court for the District of Maryland, of eight counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 , 1346 and 2. 2 United States v. … Williams Dated: _ *100 All members of the Board concur in this Report and Recommendation except Mr. Fox, who did not participate. 1 . United States v. Bereano, Nos. 95-5312 & 95-5395, - F.3d - (4th Cir. Aug. 28, 1998).

Jordan v. District of Columbia

362 A.2d 114 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1976

Hotel Association v. District of Columbia Minimum Wage and Industrial Safety Board, D.C.App., 318 A.2d 294 (1974). … Canney v. Board of Pub. Instruction of Alachua. Cty., 278 So.2d 260 (Fla.1973). 13 .

Matter of Buckley

535 A.2d 863 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 1987

In a dissenting opinion, three members of the Board recommended disbarment. Bar Counsel filed an exception to the sanction agreed upon by tbe Board’s majority. … Nonetheless, we must consider that a sanction imposed pursuant to a disciplinary proceeding is, in effect, a judgment of an attorney’s continued fitness to practice his profession, District of Columbia Bar v.

Customers Parking, Inc. v. District of Columbia

562 A.2d 651 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 18, 1989

If “aggrieved” for any reason, the taxpayer must appeal within the permitted time to the Board of Equalization and Review. District of Columbia v. … Partnership v.

McCrea v. Social Security Commissioner

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 19, 2020

Butler v. Barnhart, 353 F.3d 992, 999 (D.C. Cir. 2004). McCrea bears the burden of proof in challenging the decision. Crawford v. Barnart, 556 F. Supp. 2d 49, 51 (D.D.C. 2008); McCraw v. … See Brown v. WMATA, 164 F. Supp. 3d. 33, 34-35 (D.D.C. 2016). 8

Wayne v. Three Male Suspects

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 11, 2025

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). 1  Plaintiff alleges “Trespassing by three male suspects on Tuesday July 22, 2025,” Compl.