Case law

In re: FBOP Execution Protocol Cases

980 F.3d 123 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 18, 2020

Oregon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006), and FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000). … Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 134 (cleaned up); see also United States v.

In Re Kennedy

605 A.2d 600 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1992

PER CURIAM: In this disciplinary case, the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) found that respondent, Thomas F. … Kennedy v.

In re Silva

29 A.3d 924 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2011

See White v. United States, 582 A.2d 774, 779 (D.C.1990) (per curiam); Martin v. United States, 435 A.2d 395, 398 (D.C.1981) (per curiam). . … See Order, Virginia v. Silva, CR02-2286 (Apr. 15, 2003). . See Order, Virginia v. Silva, CR02-2286 (Mar. 15, 2005). .D.C. Bar R.

In Re Slater

627 A.2d 508 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1993

See Skeeter v. Commonwealth, 217 Va. 722 , 232 S.E.2d 756, 758-59 (1977). This court has held that the crime of grand larceny involves moral turpitude per se. … We agree with the Board’s recommendation that respondent be disbarred pursuant to D.C.Code § ll-2503(a).

UNITED STATES v. DAVID D. LEWIS

147 A.3d 236 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 2016

At the time Officer Brown arrived, Ms. Gibbs was outside the vehicle, saying that she needed to go to the bathroom. Officer Brown told Ms. Gibbs that she could not leave. … According to Officer Brown, Ms. Gibbs was not under arrest at the time the search of the car began. Once Officer Brown found the gun, she placed Ms. Gibbs in handcuffs.

Retail Clerks Union, No. 1550, Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, and the Kroger Company, Intervenor

330 F.2d 210 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1964

See, for example, Anderson Lithographic Co., 124 N.L.R.B. 920 (1959), enforced sub nom, N.L.R.B. v. … See Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

Millican v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 13, 2010

Cir. 2004) (“The Corrections Board statute, 10 U.S.C. § 1552, provides for correction of military records . . . and for judicial review of the Board’s decision”); Chambers v. Green, 544 F. … Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167, 172 (2001); Mayer Brown LLP v. IRS, 562 F.3d 1190, 1194 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (“In matters of statutory construction, the text is our primary guide”).

Burton v. United States

657 A.2d 741 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1994

Katz v. … In Florida v.

United States v. Ali

793 F. Supp. 2d 386 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2011

See United States v. Brown, 6 Fed.Appx. 5, 5-6 (D.C.Cir.2001); United States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327, 328-29 (D.C.Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 , 107 S.Ct. 148 , 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986). … See United States v.

Al-Mahdi v. United States

867 A.2d 1011 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 2005

See, e.g., Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200, 214-16 , 99 S.Ct. 2248 , 60 L.Ed.2d 824 (1979); Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975). We conclude otherwise as a matter of law. … The girl’s mother also boarded the bus. Juror 561 evidently had no further contact with her. 8 .

Iannucci v. Pearlstein

629 A.2d 555 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1993

Area Transit Auth. v. Brown, 619 A.2d 1188 , 1189 n. 3 (D.C.1993); Larry M. Rosen & Associates, Inc. v. Hurwitz, 465 A.2d 1114, 1118-19 (D.C.1983); Firestone v. Harris, 414 A.2d 526, 528 (D.C.1980); Hudson v. … See Miner v.

In Re Slavin

911 A.2d 822 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 2006

See Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Slavin, 145 S.W.3d 538 (Tenn.2004). On August 22, 2005, Bar Counsel filed a certified copy of the order from the Supreme Court of Tennessee. … As we find support in the record for the Board’s findings, we accept them, and adopt the sanction the Board recommended. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Edward A.

Harris v. United States

148 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 11, 2015

See Stokes v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 374 F.3d 1235, 1239 (D.C. … .”); Rooney v. Sec’y of Army, 405 F.3d 1029, 1032 (D.C.

In Re Kitchings

779 A.2d 926 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 2001

Braddock v. Smith, 711 A.2d 835, 840 (D.C.1998) (quoting Macauley v. District of Columbia Taxicab Comm’n, 623 A.2d 1207, 1209 (D.C.1993)). … Partnership, 630 A.2d 174, 182 (D.C.1993) (quoting Younger v. Smith, 30 Cal.App.3d 138, 153 , 106 Cal.Rptr, 225 (1973)); see also Smith v.

Matter of Meisnere

471 A.2d 269 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1984

See Dunn v. … Board on Professional Responsibility By: /s/Beatrice Rosenberg Beatrice Rosenberg Date: January 18, 1983 All members of the Board join in this opinion except Mr. Webb who did not participate in the case. 1 .

Thompson v. Jamesson

23 F. Cas. 1051 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1806

the defendant verbally promised to pay for them if Brown should be unable;” and denies that he made any other promise; and denies that the goods were sold to himself, &e. … And he refers to the case of Stewart v. Careless, cited in Whitchurch v. Bevis, 2 Brown, Ch. 566.

Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 24, 2013

) DAVID SICKLE, et. al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. … DATE: December 24, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Teamsters Local Union No. 328, Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Wittock Supply Company, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Wittock Supply Company

419 F.2d 688 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 1969

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Wittock Supply Company, Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. WITTOCK SUPPLY COMPANY, Respondent. No. 21913. No. 21977. … I would remand No. 21,913 to the Board for a statement of reasons. 10 After Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. N. L. R.

In Re Alexander

513 A.2d 781 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 1986

In Oliver v. Merit Systems Protection Board, C.A. 80-1918 (D.D.C. … Compare, Allen v.

In re Bradley

70 A.3d 1189 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 2013

Bradley, to the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (the “Board”). … Eilers v. District of Columbia Bureau of Motor Vehicles Servs., 583 A.2d 677, 685 (D.C.1990) (quoting First Nat’l Bank of Bellaire v. Comptroller of the Currency, 697 F.2d 674, 687 (5th Cir. 1983)).