Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1928

10,000+ results

2.68s

  • Martinez v. Mathis

    970 F. Supp. 1047 · District Court, S.D. Georgia · Mar 31, 1997

    “If the law was clearly established, the immunity defense ordinarily should fail, since a reasonably competent public official should know the law governing his conduct.” … “For the law to be clearly established to the point that qualified immunity does not apply, the law must have earlier been developed in such a concrete and factually defined context to make it obvious to all reasonable government

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Harris v. Hammon

    914 F. Supp. 2d 1026 · District Court, D. Minnesota · Dec 19, 2012

    Qualified immunity shields government officials from liability if “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Harlow v. … right was clearly established at the time of the alleged misconduct.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Villarreal v. City of Laredo

    17 F.4th 532 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 1, 2021

    The district court dismissed her First Amendment infringement claim against various officials on qualified immunity grounds, finding that any violation was not clearly established at the time. … of clearly established law.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Lyons v. City of Xenia

    90 F. App'x 835 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 27, 2004

    Because we conclude as a matter of law that Officer Keith did not violate any clearly-established constitutional rights, we reverse the district court’s judgment denying her qualified immunity. … defendant did acts that violated clearly established rights.”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Snow v. City of El Paso, Texas

    501 F. Supp. 2d 826 · District Court, W.D. Texas · Apr 4, 2006

    Qualified immunity shields public officials from both civil damages and trial “if their actions were objectively reasonable in light of then clearly established law.” Bazan v. … The Court employs a two step process to resolve a qualified immunity defense. First, the Court must determine whether the plaintiff has alleged “the violation of a clearly established Constitutional *835 right.”

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Bitner

    285 F. Supp. 2d 593 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2003

    Defendants also claim entitlement to qualified immunity on the ground that the violation was not so “clearly established” that prison officials should be expected to avoid it. … Long, 72 F.3d 70, 73-74 (8th Cir.1995) (finding that Muslim inmates had a clearly established right to refrain from handling pork for purposes of a qualified immunity analysis); Kenner v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hoard v. Sizemore

    198 F.3d 205 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 17, 1999

    immunity, i.e., whether a given set of facts violates clearly established law.” … violated clearly established law.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Buck v. City of Albuquerque

    549 F.3d 1269 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Dec 9, 2008

    entitlement to qualified immunity. … Third, he urges that, even if the officers did not have probable cause to arrest, he is protected by qualified immunity’s second prong, because the right of the Arrested Plaintiffs was not clearly established.

    Cited 141 timesPublished
  • Dunn v. City of Boynton Beach

    192 F. Supp. 3d 1310 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 14, 2016

    A public official performing a discretionary function enjoys qualified immunity in a civil action for damages if his or her conduct “does not violate clearly established federal statutory or constitutional rights of which … Qualified immunity may be raised in a motion to dismiss. Skrtich v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • PANAGACOS v. Towery

    782 F. Supp. 2d 1183 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Mar 1, 2011

    Qualified Immunity. … The second step of the qualified immunity analysis requires the Court to determine whether the constitutional rights at issue were clearly established when viewed in the specific context of the case.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Loynachan v. Smiley

    District Court, E.D. California · Feb 7, 2024

    Qualified immunity is a 25 question of law to be decided by the court. … Clearly Established Right 5 Still, qualified immunity applies if the violated 6 constitutional right was not clearly established.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Navajo Housing Authority v. Johns

    11 Am. Tribal Law 31 · Navajo Nation Supreme Court · Sep 10, 2012

    , as Dana clearly intended. … However, the provision was, without doubt, part of the larger statutory scheme that established NHA as a public body.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Schmelz v. Monroe County

    954 F.2d 1540 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Feb 19, 1992

    Good faith qualified immunity is a doctrine that protects government employees from suit for actions that “ ‘legitimately require action in which clearly established rights are not implicated’ ” and the public interest would … Once qualified immunity is asserted by the defendants, the plaintiff must show that the law was clearly established that the defendants’ acts rose to the level of “deliberate indifference.” Edwards, 867 F.2d at 1275 .

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Phoenix v. Reddish

    175 F. Supp. 2d 215 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Apr 19, 2001

    Clearly Established Duty Phoenix argues in opposition to Carr’s claim of qualified immunity that he had a duty to intervene to prevent the police officers from violating her fourth amendment rights and that he violated that … Because Carr did not have a clearly established constitutional duty to intervene, he is entitled to qualified immunity.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Michael Thomas Wilson v. Barry A. Kittoe, and Anthony S. Tokach

    337 F.3d 392 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 22, 2003

    Under the second prong of our qualified immunity analysis, we must determine whether the right alleged to have been violated was a “clearly established ... right[ ] of which a reasonable person would have known.” … For the foregoing reasons, Wilson has alleged the violation of a clearly established Fourth Amendment right. Accordingly, the district court’s denial of qualified immunity is affirmed. AFFIRMED 1 .

    Abrogated on other grounds by Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008)Cited 147 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. Jones

    148 F. Supp. 3d 395 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 24, 2015

    The right in question was clearly established, such that qualified immunity is unwarranted. ‘ Defendants argue that Officer Jones is entitled to qualified immunity because the constitutional right allegedly violated was not … clearly established at the time Officer Jones acted.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Breuder v. Board of Trustees

    238 F. Supp. 3d 1054 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 3, 2017

    Defeating qualified immunity requires (1) conduct violating the plaintiffs constitutional or statutory rights that is (2) clearly established at the time of the violation such that a “reasonable official would understand … Here, the Individual Defendants claim that, even if there was a violation, it was not clearly established.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Soto v. Coughlin

    666 F. Supp. 634 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 20, 1987

    The defendants claim that they are entitled to qualified immunity from suit for the conduct alleged in the complaint on the ground that the alleged conduct did not, at the time it occurred, violate clearly established law … Qualified immunity from liability is available to executive officials in their personal capacity only if the conduct at issue was not a clearly established violation of law at the time the conduct occurred, and only with

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Padgett v. Wright

    587 F.3d 983 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 20, 2009

    The reasoning behind this departure from the general rule is that qualified immunity is “an immunity from suit rather than a mere defense to liability; ... it is effectively lost if a case is erroneously permitted to go to … at issue was ‘clearly established’ at the time of defendant’s alleged misconduct.”

    Cited 3,114 timesPublished
  • Conkey v. Reno

    885 F. Supp. 1389 · District Court, D. Nevada · May 4, 1995

    Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity protects government officials from civil liability for actions taken in the performance of discretionary functions when their actions do not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional … Conkey of property without due process of law on the basis of qualified immunity. The complaint alleges the violation of a clearly established constitutional right.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.