Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

2.73s

  • Riggs v. Hodges

    7 F. Supp. 2d 690 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 22, 1998

    See 7 U.S.C. § 1366 ; McLamb v. Pope, 657 F.2d 77, 78-79 (4th Cir.1981). The review committee’s findings of fact are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence. See 7 U.S.C. § 1366 ; McLamb, 657 F.2d at 79 . … The Supreme Court of South Carolina interpreted § 1366’s requirement of “substantial evidence” in Lee v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Everhart v. Pdci, Inc.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 14, 2000

    Brown on 21 January 1998. Dr. Brown recommended a lumbar laminectomy. 7. Dr. Brown performed a lumbar hemilaminectony on plaintiff's L5-S1 on 11 February 1998. … Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc., 300 N.C. 164 , 265 S.E.2d 389 (1980); Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Co., 233 N.C. 372 , 64 S.E.2d 265 (1951). 4.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Brigman v. Baley

    213 N.C. 119 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1938

    The said commission shall serve as members of the equalization board and shall sit with the county commissioners as members of said equalization board, and the two boards shall constitute the equalization board of Madison … Groves v. Barden, 169 N. C., 8 , 84 S. E., 1042 ; S. v. Knight, ib., 333, 85 S. E., 418 ; Eliason v. Coleman, 86 N. C., 236 ; Clark v. Stanley, 66 N. C., 60 ; Worthy v. Barrett, 63 N. C., 199 ; U. S. v. Hartwell, 73 U.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Venable v. School Committee of Pilot Mountain

    149 N.C. 120 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1908

    County Board, at this term) or the committee is influenced by improper motives or there is misconduct on their part. Smith v. School Trustees, 141 N. C., 160 . … of $20 towards the purchase of the lot to be donated to the board created any interest invalidating the action of the board.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Harts Book Stores, Inc. v. City of Raleigh

    53 N.C. App. 753 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1981

    Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 467 , 202 S.E. 2d 129, 135 (1974); see also In re Application of Ellis, 277 N.C. 419, 425 , 178 S.E. 2d 77, 80 (1970). … Jackson v. Board of Adjustment, 275 N.C. 155, 165 , 166 S.E. 2d 78, 85 (1969).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Holmes v. Bullock

    178 N.C. 376 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 22, 1919

    It acquired only the jurisdiction of the board of supervisors to determine whether a cartway should be established. McLaurin v. McIntyre; 167 N. C., 350 ; Boyett v. Vaughan, 85 N. C., 365 ; Ijames v. McClamrock, 92 N. … C., 365 ; Robeson v. Hodges, 105 N. C., 49 ; S. v. Wiseman, 131 N. C., 797 . The supervisors had no jurisdiction of proceedings for the laying out of a public road.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Blevins v. Town of West Jefferson

    182 N.C. App. 675 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 2007

    Background On 26 April 2006, the trial court entered an order reversing the decision of the Town of West Jefferson Board of Adjustment. … The heading on the notice in the record on appeal contains a “notice of appeal” from the “BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT.”

    Reversed by Blevins v. Town of West Jefferson, 361 N.C. 578 (2007)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Chrismon v. Guilford County

    322 N.C. 611 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 28, 1988

    See, e.g., Hartnett v. Austin, 93 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 1956); V. F. Zahodiakin Eng’r Corp. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 8 N.J. 386 , 86 A. 2d 127 (1952). … See also Tennison v. Shomette, 38 Md. App. 1 , 379 A. 2d 187 (1977); Save Our Rural Environment v.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Assimos

    146 N.C. App. 339 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 2, 2001

    Brown at North Carolina Baptist Hospital. ... Dr. Brown put water in [Plaintiff’s] ears and she could not feel the water. Dr. Brown asked [Plaintiff] . . . what medicine she had been given. ... At the time . . . … Elam, 302 N.C. 157, 161 , 273 S.E.2d 661, 664 (1981); see also State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 211 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 22 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L. Ed. 2d 406 (1987); State v.

    Vacated on other grounds by Anderson v. Assimos, 356 N.C. 415 (2002)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Templeton Properties LP v. TOWN OF BOONE

    198 N.C. App. 406 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 2009

    TEMPLETON PROPERTIES LP, Petitioner v. TOWN OF BOONE and TOWN OF BOONE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Respondents No. … NOTES [1] Batch v. Town of Chapel Hill, 326 N.C. 1, 11-12 , 387 S.E.2d 655, 662 (1990) (citing Jamison v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Webb v. City of Raleigh

    88 N.C. App. 480 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 19, 1988

    Plaintiff Steve Webb t/a Snoopy’s, Solomon Brown t/a Brown Alignment Service, and Byrd’s Mobile Unit, Inc. t/a the Dairy Freeze brought an action against the City of Raleigh on 13 July 1979 challenging the constitutionality … See Rose’s Stores, Inc. v. Tarrytown Center, Inc., 270 N.C. 206, 212 , 154 S.E. 2d 313, 317 (1967). Webb did not violate the 20 November 1981 order. Judgment is vacated. Judges Eagles and Cozort concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bynum v. Second Ward High School Mecklenbug County School Board

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 25, 2019

    He names the Second Ward High School Mecklenburg County School Board and the “Staff of Second Ward” as Defendants. … Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327-28 (1989). Furthermore, a pro se complaint must be construed liberally. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Silvers v. Horace Mann Insurance

    90 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 1988

    Defendant cites Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co., 285 N.C. 313 , 204 S.E. 2d 829 (1974) and Buchanan v. Buchanan, 83 N.C. … Brown, 285 N.C. at 319-20 , 204 S.E. 2d at 834 .

    Modified by Silvers v. Horace Mann Insurance, 324 N.C. 289 (1989)Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Casper v. Chatham County

    186 N.C. App. 456 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 2007

    Stat. § 153A-340(cl) (2005) (providing that “the board of adjustment, the planning board, or the board of commissioners may issue special use permits or conditional use permits”); N.C. Gen. Stat. § 153A-345(b) (2005). … Kentallen, Inc. v. Hillsborough, 110 N.C. App. 767, 769 , 4331 S.E.2d 231 , 232 (1993). 2 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Doe on the Demise of Gibson v. Gibson

    49 N.C. 425 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1857

    Davidson v. Davidson, 1 Hawks Rep. 161 ; Brown v. Brown, 8 Ire. Rep. 134 ; Long v. Norcom, 4 Ire.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Faircloth v. . Kenlaw

    165 N.C. 228 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1914

    Galvin v. Prentice, 145 N. Y., 162 , citing King v. Brown, 2 Hill, 481 ; Lockwood v. … Albea v. Griffin, 22 N. C., 9 ; Hedgepeth v. Rose, 95 N. C., 41 ; Tucher v. Markland, 101 N. C., 422 ; Vick v. Vick, 126 N. C., 123 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • James v. . Sutton

    229 N.C. 515 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1948

    That power cannot be delegated to the Board of Adjustment. … We so held in Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N. C. 107 , 37 S. E. (2) 128, and we adhere to that decision.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Crawley v. . Stearns

    194 N.C. 15 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 10, 1927

    Brown and Alice E. … The principle is stated with like clearness by Brown, J., in Weeks v. Wilkins, 139 N.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • MB Realty Group, Inc. v. Gaston County Board of Education

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 28, 2019

    P. 37(e); and (2) [the Court’s] ‘inherent power’” Silvestri v. Gen. Motors Corp., 271 F.3d 583, 590 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Chambers v. … Nuvasive, Inc. v. Kormanis, No. 1:18- cv-282, 2019 WL 1171486, at *2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 2019) (citing Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. Murphee, 326 U.S. 438, 444 (1946)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rose v. . R. G. Franklin

    216 N.C. 289 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1939

    Brown v. *291 House, 118 N. C., 870 , 24 S. E., 786 ; Power Co. v. Savage, 170 N. C., 625 , 87 S. E., 629 , and numerous other decisions. … Likewise, as stated by Brown, J., in Wall v. Wall, 142 N. C., 387 , 55 S.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.