Case law

Brown v. . Mailler

12 N.Y. 118 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1854

But the cases in this state are the other way, and the question has been settled against the competency of such evidence in the court of last resort. ( Paige v. Cagwin, 7 Hill, 361 , 369.)

Corbett v. Brown

32 A.D.2d 27 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 21, 1969

(Joyce v. Rumsey Realty Corp., 17 N Y 2d 118; Major v. Waverly & Ogden, 7 N Y 2d 332; Koenig v. Patrick Constr. Corp., 298 N. Y. 313 ; Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Mancini & Sons, 9 A D 2d 116.) … The board may make rules to carry into effect the provisions of this section.”

People v. Brown

281 A.D.2d 962 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 21, 2001

To obtain a valid waiver, County Court was not required to engage in any particular litany (see, People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 ; People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909, 910-911 ; People v McDonald, 270 AD2d 955 , lv denied 95 NY2d … The waiver encompasses the contention of defendant that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress his statements to the police (see, People v Frank, 258 AD2d 900, 901 , lv denied 93 NY2d 924 ; People v Hicks, 254

Brown v. Chadsey

39 Barb. 253 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1863

(Mitchell v. Jenkins, 5 B. & Adol. 588. Whalley v. Pepper, 7 Carr. & Payne, 506. Walker v. Cruikshank, 2 Hill, 297 . 1 Arch. N. P. 446.) … (See Samuel v. Payne, Doug. 358; Holley v. Mix, 3 Wend. 350 .)

People v. Brown

25 N.Y.2d 374 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 1969

(See People v. Sine, 277 App. Div. 908 ; see, also, Denzer and McQuillan, Practice Commentary Penal Law, § 140.00 *377 [McKinney’s Cons. Laws of N. Y., Book 39, part 1, pp. 340, 342].) … Since the People thus failed in their burden of proving each and every element of the crime charged, and, specifically, the absence or loss of a statutory privilege or license to enter and remain (see People v.

Wood v. . Brown

34 N.Y. 337 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 1866

In Seaman v. Durea ( 11 N. … (Williams on Ex., 1548; Langford v. Gascon, 11 Vesey, 335; Clark v. Clark, 8 Paige, 152 .)

Malins v. . Brown

4 N.Y. 403 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1850

.; 3 Atk . 1; Carman v. Cooke, 1 Sch. Lef . 40.) In Wetmore v. White, (2 Cai. Cas. in Err . 109,) it was assumed, that payment of the consideration entitled the party to a specific performance.

Brown v. Jones

46 Barb. 400 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1866

The case is quite similar, in principle, to that of McBurney v. Wellman, ( 42 Barb. 400 .) … Rep. 462 ,) or Halsey v. Sinsebaugh, (15 id. 485 .)

People v. Brown

193 A.D.3d 1441 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 30, 2021

People v Brown ( 2021 NY Slip Op 02712 ) People v Brown 2021 NY Slip Op 02712 Decided on April 30, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … MOTION NO. (1764/96) KA 02-01784. [*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v DERRICK BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied.

Mumford v. Brown

1 Wend. 52 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1828

People v. Brown

186 A.D.3d 1105 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 20, 2020

People v Brown ( 2020 NY Slip Op 04700 ) People v Brown 2020 NY Slip Op 04700 Decided on August 20, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES A. HOBBS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

People v. Brown

132 N.Y.S.3d 768 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 1, 2020

People v Brown ( 2020 NY Slip Op 07144 ) People v Brown 2020 NY Slip Op 07144 Decided on December 01, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § … Ind No. 1073/17 Appeal No. 12500 Case No. 2019-4082 [*1]The People of The State of New York, Respondent, v Geneva Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Janet E.

People v. Brown

119 A.D.3d 980 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 3, 2014

v Marshall, 108 AD3d 884, 884 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 957 [2013]). … Accordingly, he is precluded from challenging the sentence imposed as harsh and excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255-256 ; People v Munger, 117 AD3d 1343, 1343 [2014]; People v Waldron, 115 AD3d at 1117 ).

Birckhead v. Brown

2 Denio 375 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1845

Brown & Co. under the circumstances stated in the special verdict became parties to that contract, and were entitled to enforce it by action against the defendants. … Brown & Co. rity of contract between the *377 plaintiffs and the defendants, and agreeing substantially with the positions laid down in the opinion of the supreme court.

People v. Brown

24 N.Y.2d 421 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1969

Brown walked away from him and entered a building at 126th Street and came out shortly thereafter and rejoined Mr. Brown. I observed Mr. Brown and that other person come close together. … People v. White, 16 N Y 2d 270), and no misstatements when questioned about observed activity (People v.

Macri v. Brown

133 A.D.3d 1333 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 20, 2015

award visitation depends to a great extent upon its assessment of the credibility of the witnesses and upon the assessments of character, temperament, and sincerity of the parents and grandparents” (Matter of Hilgenberg v … given to him by petitioners, and, as explained by petitioners’ expert, the negative impact that continued visitation with respondent could have on the child’s relationship with petitioners (see generally Matter of Ordona v

People v. Brown

56 N.Y.2d 242 · New York Court of Appeals · May 20, 1982

Ford, 46 NY2d 1021 ; People v Session, 34 NY2d 254 ). … Teen’s affidavit also stated that he never conspired to kill Thomas Wright with Brown or anyone else, and that he never saw Brown until after he (Teen) was arrested.

Foot v. Brown

8 Johns. 64 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1811

In the case of Poe v. Mendford, (Cro.

Price v. . Brown

98 N.Y. 388 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1885

(Reeder v. Sayre, 70 N. Y. 180 ; Harris v. Tumbridge, 83 id. 92.) … In Pease v.

Brown v. Lavine

37 N.Y.2d 317 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1975

Aiello v Commissioner of Public Welfare, 358 Mass 91; Rex Investigative & Patrol Agency v Collura, 329 F Supp 696 ; Administrative Hearings—Aid of Counsel, Ann., 33 ALR3d 229, 289.) … (Crowder v Gardner, 249 F Supp 678 ; Ihnen v Celebrezze, 223 F Supp 157 ; Hall v Celebrezze, 217 F Supp 905 .)