Case law

Middletown Township Board of Education v. Board of Trustees

229 N.J. 603 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 16, 2017

STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MARK A. MARTIN (15-10-0688, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 9, 2020

State v. Hamlett, 449 N.J. Super. 159, 169 (App. Div. 2017) (quoting State v. Jones, 179 N.J. 377, 388 (2004)). As the Court recently clarified in State v. … State v. McQuaid, 147 N.J. 464, 487 (1997). In State v.

State v. Bruzzese

94 N.J. 210 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 8, 1983

See Texas v. Brown,- U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983); Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 , 29 L.Ed. 2d 564 (1971). … There is merit in adopting these Texas v. Brown requirements to establish the plain view exception.

Brown v. Fidelity Trust Co.

82 N.J. Eq. 323 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 10, 1913

Wurls’ Executors v. Page, 19 N. J. Eq. (4 C. E. Gr.) 365. … Lanphier v. Buck, 2 Dr. & Sm. 484.

Brown v. Morrisey & Walker, Inc.

106 N.J.L. 307 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 1930

In Malinowski v. Lincoln Development Co., 103 N. J. … Mendles v. Danish, 74 N. J. L. 333; Lustig v. Meirick, 82 Id. 498; Haler v. Goldberg, 92 Id. 367.

Urban v. Planning Board

124 N.J. 651 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 18, 1991

Kramer v. Board of Adjustment, 45 N.J 268, 296, 212 A.2d 153 (1965). … Medici v. BPR Co., 107 N.J. 1, 21 , 526 A.2d 109 (1987). A board should not be guided by inappropriate factors in its decision-making process. See Borough of Glassboro v.

Brown v. Comer

16 N.J. Misc. 444 · Atlantic County Circuit Court, N.J. · Sep 27, 1938

Marsh v. Lasher, 13 N. J. Eq. 253, 255; Boehme v. Rall, 51 Id. 541, 546; 26 Atl. Rep. 832 ; Dunlap v. Chenoweth, 88 N. J. Eq. 496; 104 Atl. Rep. 822 ; Kobrin v. Hull, 96 N. J. Eq. 41; 124 Atl. Rep. 365 ; Mooney v. … Pl. *523; Flemming v. Hoboken, 40 N. J. L. 270; Grafflin v. Jackson, 40 Id. 440.

MARGATE TAVERN OWNERS'ASS'N v. Brown

144 N.J. Super. 435 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 14, 1976

Roland Brown." On August 5, 1976 appellant civic association submitted a petition to Brown for filing. … Roland Brown, City Clerk, Margate City, New Jersey We, the undersigned citizens of the City of Margate, hereby petition the Board of Commissioners for the passage of the following ordinance as provided in N.J.S.A. 40:74-14

Brown v. Royal Battery Corp.

131 N.J. Eq. 345 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 27, 1942

Martin v. Melville, 11 N.J. Eq. 222 ; DeGroot v. McCotter, 19 N.J. Eq. 531 ; Wilson v. Bird, 28 N.J. Eq. 352 ; Bell v. Romaine, 30 N.J. Eq. 24 ; Van Syckel v. O'Hearn, 50 N.J. Eq. 173 ; 24 Atl. … Security Trust and Safe Deposit Co. v. New Jersey *Page 352 Paper Board, c., Manufacturing Co., 57 N.J. Eq. 603 ; 42 Atl. Rep. 746 ; Lettieri v. Mistretta, supra; 41 C.J. 877 ¶ 1085.

Brown v. Fairleigh Dickinson University

560 F. Supp. 391 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 15, 1983

Board of Education of Memphis City Schools, 611 F.2d 624, 636 (6th Cir.1979) (prevailing defendant), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 2999 , 64 L.Ed.2d 862 (1980); Bradford v. … See, e.g., Skomorucha v. Wilmington Housing *409 Authority, 518 F.Supp. 657 (D.Del.1981); Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 501 F.Supp. 1360, 1381 (M.D. Pa.1981); Keown v.

Brown v. Calhoun

15 F. Supp. 659 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 15, 1936

Wasson v. White (D.C.) 12 F.(2d) 809 . … have been drawn and enacted with full knowledge as to the rights, obligations, and duties of receivers as theretofore made known by the decisions of the courts on the subject, having in mind particularly the case of Wasson v.

Brown v. City of Newark

202 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 25, 1985

Super. 1 (1985) 493 A.2d 1255 RICHARD BROWN AND ERNEST KING, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. … Singer v.

Brown Assocs. v. Interstate Fire

413 N.J. Super. 160 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 2010

BROWN ASSOCIATES, INC. and Zurich American Insurance Co., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. … Therefore, the coverage Zurich provided to Brown made Interstate's coverage of Brown under its additional insured endorsement "excess." As we explained in W9/PHC Real Estate LP v. Farm Family Cas. Ins.

Hardwicke v. American Boychoir School

188 N.J. 69 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 8, 2006

See State v. … Dist. 47J v.

Board of Education v. State Board of Education

5 N.J. Misc. 152 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1927

The basis of the order was an order of the commissioner of education, dated January 29th, 1925, affirmed by the state board of education, dated July 11th, 1925, by which it was ordered that such school transportation facilities … be provided for the Phillips children. *153 The prosecutor relies upon the case of Frelinghuysen Township Board of Education v.

Ward v. Scott

11 N.J. 117 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 15, 1952

In Carson v. Board of Appeals of Lexington, 321 Mass. 649 , 75 N. E. 2d 116 (Sup. … See Lumund v. Board of Adjustment, 4 N. J. 577, 585 (1950).

Brown v. East Ridgelawn Cemetery

87 N.J. Eq. 173 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Dec 2, 1914

The scheme of the declaration of trust is the same as that referred to in Bliss v. Linden Cemetery Co., 81 N. J. … In Bliss v.

Board of Education v. State Board of Education

27 N.J. 76 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 1958

Compare Board of Education v. Atwood, 73 N. J. L. 315 (Sup. Ct. 1906), affirmed 74 N. J. L. 638 (E. & A. 1907), with Board of Education of West Amwell v. State Bd Ed. of N. J., 5 N. J. Misc. 152 (Sup. Ct. 1927). R. … See Ablondi v. Board of Review, 8 N. J. Super. 71, 75 (App. Div. 1950). Reversed. *82 For reversal—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Heiier, Burling, Jacobs, Francis and Proctor—6.

Willoughby v. Planning Board

306 N.J. Super. 266 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 2, 1997

I The Planning Board’s approval of Wolfson’s site plan application constituted a grom-judieial decision of a municipal administrative agency, see Kotlarich v. … Damurjian v. Board of Adjustment of Colts Neck, 299 N.J.Super. 84, 97-99 , 690 A.2d 655 (App.Div.1997) (four years); Wolf v.

State ex rel. Brown v. Cline

62 N.J.L. 489 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1898

In Oler v. Ridgeway, 26 Vroom 10 , this court decided that the act of March 10th, 1892, was general and valid. Scr much being granted, it is impossible, reasonably, to condemn the supplement of 1897 as special. … This supplement extends its provisions to every board organized under the act of 1892,. and although it relates to but one function of the board, yet in that respect it is like every distinct enactment of the-original statute