Case law

Inhabitants of Town of Bethel v. INHABITANTS, ETC.

151 Me. 318 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 17, 1955

’s mentality, and (4) whether the Board of Overseers of the plaintiff town unlawfully delegated their duties. … Bangor v. Hampden, 41 Maine, 484; Corinna v. Exeter, 13 Maine, 321.” See also Norridgewock v. Solon, 49 Me. 385 (1862); Alna v. Plummer, 4 Me. 258 (1826); Clinton v. Benton, 49 Me. 550 (1862); Naples v.

Inhabitants of the Town of Searsport v. Board of Environmental Protection

438 A.2d 261 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 17, 1981

The Town of Searsport (Town) appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Waldo County, affirming the decision of the Board of Environmental Protection (Board) denying payment to the Town from the Solid Waste Subsidy Fund … On the Town’s petition to the Board for reconsideration, this determination was reaffirmed.

Johnson v. Drummond, Woodsum, Plimpton & MacMahon, P.A.

490 A.2d 676 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 11, 1985

In Carter v. … In Murphy v.

Bolduc v. Pinkham

148 Me. 17 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 13, 1952

The plaintiff in this Bill in Equity, according to factual allegations carried in his amended process, admitted to be true by defendants’ demurrer, Brown v. Guy Gannett Publishing Co., 147 Me. 3 , 82 A. 2d. 797; Lea v. … Ed. 303 , 54 A.L.R. 1016 ; Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 274 U.S. 325 , 47 S. Ct. 594 , 71 L.

Woodworth v. Rogers

30 F. Cas. 581 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · May 15, 1847

Alden v. … Woodworth v. Sherman [Case No. 18,019]; Washburn v. Gould [Id. 17,214]; Woodworth v. Stone [Id. 18,021].

Brown v. Peoples Heritage Bank

Superior Court of Maine · Dec 28, 2000

See Tungate v. MacLean Stevens Studios, Inc., 1998 ME 162 { 13, 714 A.2d 792, 797-98 (Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act); Brae Asset Fund L.P. v. … Adam, 661 A.2d 1137, 1140 (Me. 1995) (negligent misrepresentation); Jourdain v. Dineen, 527 A.2d 1304, 1307 (Me. 1987) (fraud). In this case the Browns cannot do this for two reasons.

Stone v. Bartlett

46 Me. 438 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1859

The attachment in the suit, Nichols v. Brown & Bunker, is dated October 11, 1851, and the sale of the equity was made June 30, 1852. … The mortgage of Swett to these defendants was long prior to the attachment in the writ, Nichols v. Brown & Bunker.

Board of Directors v. Teachers' Ass'n of Maine School Administrative District No. 33

395 A.2d 461 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 29, 1978

With respect to the merits of this claim, see Murray v. Waterville Board of Education, Me., 390 A.2d 516 (1978). 8 . … The court went on to determine that the arbitrator was incorrect, citing Caribou Teachers Association v. Board of Education, Civil No. 74-75 (N.D.Me.1975) and General Electric Co. v.

Harrington v. Inhabitants of Town of Kennebunk

459 A.2d 557 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 26, 1983

Singal v. City of Bangor, 440 A.2d 1048, 1050 (Me.1982); see Seven Islands Land Co. v. … Chadbourne & Co. v. Inhabitants of Town of Bethel, 452 A.2d 400, 408 (Me.1982) (Carter, J., dissenting); LaPointe v. City of Saco, 419 A.2d 1013 , 1015 n. 2 (Me.1980); Brown v.

Inhabitants of the Town of Warren v. Norwood

138 Me. 180 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 20, 1941

For later cases, see Brown v. Veazie, 25 Me., 359; Hobbs v. Clements, 32 Me., 67; Bowler v. Brown, 84 Me., 376, *184 24 A., 879 ; Baker v. Webber, 102 Me., 414, 67 A., 144 . … Lord, supra; Inhabitants of Orneville v. Palmer, 79 Me., 472, 10 A., 451 ; Bowler v. Brown, supra.

Armstrong v. Bangor Mill Supply Corp.

128 Me. 75 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 1, 1929

Hattin v. Chase, 88 Me., 237, 239; Leighton v. Sargent, 27 N. H., 460, 59 Am. … Fibre Co. v. Electric Co., 95 Me., 318, 327; Brown v. Linn Woolen Co., 114 Me., 266, 268. The damages awarded do not exceed the losses sustained. Motion overruled.

Brown v. Benchmark Cleaning & Supply, Inc.

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 17, 2012

VELVET BROWN, Plaintiff v. … Watt v. Unifirst Corp., 2009 ME 47 ~ 22, 969 A.2d 897, 902.

Whitman v. Freese

23 Me. 185 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1843

It was received in part payment for boards sold without survey, by estimation, by their agent, Wadleigh, to the defendants, who contend, that the sale was made in violation of the provisions of an act approved on March 9, … Tho only testimony introduced by them in proof of it came from the witness, Brown, who testified, that at tho time of the sale Chadwick, one of the defendants, “ said in the presence of Wad-leigh, that he wanted the boards

Shaw v. Young

87 Me. 271 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 4, 1895

Brown were boarding at the hotel and saw much of what was being done. They made inquiries, and advised more or less with the workmen about the work. They made no objection to anything. … Morse v. Dole, 73 Maine, 357. Counsel have cited decisions of courts of other states in which-the word "owner ” in similar statutes is held to be limited to the tenant in possession, having an estate.

Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town of Harrison

655 A.2d 876 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 7, 1995

Aseptic Packaging Council v. State, 637 A.2d 457, 461 (Me.1994) (quoting Brown-Forman Distillers v. N.Y. Liquor Auth., 476 U.S. 573, 578-79 , 106 S.Ct. 2080, 2084 , 90 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986)). … Brown-Forman, 476 U.S. at 579 , 106 S.Ct. at 2084 .

United States v. Hilton

469 F. Supp. 94 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 22, 1979

Rakas v. Illinois, supra; Brown v. … See Rakas v. Illinois, supra; Brown v. United States, supra.

Inhabitants of Farmingdale v. Berlin Mills Co.

93 Me. 333 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 11, 1899

Brown, 53 Maine, 519, under the statute then in force, which provided that “ all goods, wares and merchandise, all logs, timber, boards and other lumber, and all stock in trade, including stock employed in the business of … The claim of the defendant derives less support from the present statute than from that in force when Ellsworth v. Brown was decided, and which was not sustained there.

Watson v. State of Commissioner of Banking

223 A.2d 834 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 27, 1966

Clark v. Brown (1965) 1 Ohio St.2d 121 , 205 N.E.2d 377 , [3] 380 (budget counseling service) ; and in principle, Baxter v. Waterville Sewerage District, 146 Me. 211, 214 , 79 A.2d 585 . … Clark v. Brown (1965—budget counseling) 1 Ohio St.2d 121 , 205 N.E.2d 377 ; Hankins v. Spaulding (1957—collection agency) 78 Idaho 533 , 307 P.2d 222 .

Cohen v. Millett

400 A.2d 1080 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 25, 1979

Following our decision in Cohen v. Maine School Admin. Dist. … For recent discussions on the issue of standing to appeal, see Brown v. Manchester, Me., 384 A.2d 449, 451-52 (1978); Matter of Pitt-ston Co. Oil Refinery, Me., 375 A.2d 530, 532-33 (1977); Nichols v.

Marden v. City of Waterville

226 A.2d 369 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 13, 1967

In Brown v. Grzeskowiak (1951), 230 Ind. 110 , 101 N.E.2d 639 , 102 N.E.2d 372 , the Indiana Court stated persuasively the principles of law applicable to the facts of our case. … McArtor v. State ex rel. Lewis, 1925, 196 Ind. 460 , 148 N.E. 477 , supra; Vincent v. Simms, 1934, 207 Ind. 47 , 191 N.E. 150 ; Boone v. Smith, 1948, 225 Ind. 617 , 77 N. E.2d 357 ; Wood v.