Case law

United States v. Brown

684 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 1988

United States v. Rasmussen, 642 F.2d 165, 167 (5th Cir.1981) (citations omitted). … United States v. Trott, 779 F.2d 912, 915 (3d Cir.1985) (citations omitted). See also United States v. Martinez, 785 F.2d 111, 114 (3d Cir.1986).

Brown v. District of Columbia

514 F.3d 1279 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 1, 2008

claim against the former Attorney General, Brown v. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (dismissal for failure to state a claim); Second Amendment Found. v. U.S. Conference of Mayors, 274 F.3d 521, 523 (D.C.

Brown v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 31, 2024

Brown v. … nursing homes and board and care homes . . . .

Brown, Manning & Co. v. Boker

20 D.C. 99 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1891

Justice Hag-nrr delivered the opinion of the Court: This is a bill in equity to enforce mechanics’ liens filed by Brown the general contractor, and Manning & Whiting, subcontractors, for work claimed to have been done on … request of the defendant, and' who found fauF with many features in the execution of the work. *102 The case was carefully examined below and the court made a decree reducing by a sum of ninety odd dollars the claim of Brown

United States v. Brown

616 F. Supp. 1319 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 22, 1985

Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970). … Chambers v. Maroney, supra; United States v. Whitfield, 629 F.2d 136 (D.C.Cir.1980); United States v. Harris, 627 F.2d 474 (D.C.Cir.1980).

Brown v. Industrial Bank

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2009

District and FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bankruptcy Courts JEROME JULTIJS BROWN, SR., Plaintiff, v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiffs complaint fails to accomplish the basic purpose of Rule 8(a).

Brown v. National Academy of Sciences

844 A.2d 1113 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 2004

Brown on both aspects of those seven counts. Our de novo review of the record, see Doe v. … In Hall v.

Brown v. District of Columbia

153 A.2d 658 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1959

Joseph A. Brown v. United States

181 A.3d 164 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2018

See, e.g. , White v. … Simply put, in order for Brown's claim to succeed, the court would have to engage in pure speculation. 5 Curry v. United States , 498 A.2d 534 , 540 (D.C. 1985) (citing Williams v.

Brown v. District of Columbia

147 A.2d 443 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 2, 1959

See also Section 165 (v), Part II, Article-XXVII of the Regulations reading as follows: “At the following points all vehicles except streetcars being driven in the lane nearest to the center of the street, shall make a left-turn

Capital Traction Co. v. Brown

29 App. D.C. 473 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 7, 1907

In Adams v. Washington & G. R. Co. 9 App. D. C. 26, it does not appear, except inferentially, whether there was room inside the car when the plaintiff boarded it. … The case of Nolan v. Brooklyn City & N. R. Co. 87 N. Y. 63 , 41 Am. Rep. 345 , is much in point, as the appellant in the present case contends that Brown stood upon the platform because he was smoking.

Brown v. District of Columbia

14 D.C. 502 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1884

“Board or other foundation made water-proof; square blocks in transverse rows, with spacing strips between to make a groove, the groove to be filled with broken stone, gravel and tar, or other like materials.”

Wesley v. Walter A. Brown

196 A.2d 921 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1964

C.L. p. 730, § 91.” 2 See also Corinne Mill, Canal & Stock Co. v. Toponce, 152 U.S. 405 , 14 S.Ct. 632 , 38 L.Ed. 493 ; Jordan v. United States, D.C.E.D.Wis., 180 F.Supp. 950, 952 ; 54 C.J.S. … Woodward v. Armstrong, 64 App.D.C. 4 , 73 F.2d 513 .

United States v. Douglas F. Brown, A/K/A Douglas Brown

476 F.2d 933 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 1973

Marshall, No. 71-1491 (D.C. filed June 10, 1971); United States v. Brown, 71-1497 (D.C.Cir. filed June 18, 1971); United States v. Jeffries, 71-1356 (D.C.Cir. filed May 3, 1971). 5 . United States v. … See United States v. Benn & Hunt, _ U.S.App.D.C. _, 476 F.2d 1127 (1972). 11 . Fed.R.Crim.P. 33; see, United States v. Thompson, No. 71-1182, 154 U.S.App.D.C. _ , 475 F.2d 931 (1973); United States v.

Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.

782 F. Supp. 125 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 1991

In Powell v. … Named plaintiffs include Antony Brown, James Bishop, John Buddenberg, Gary Couch, Graig Davis, Matthew J. Jaworski, Ricky Andrews, and Wesley Pritchert. 2 .

Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.

812 F. Supp. 237 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 2, 1992

Circuit’s holding in Smith v. Pro Football, Inc., 593 F.2d 1173 (D.C.Cir.1978). In Smith , a professional football player challenged the NFL’s player draft as viola-tive of § 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. … Defendants’ Motion to Reconsider is grounded on defendants’ reading oí the Supreme Court’s opinion in NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85 , 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984).

Brown v. Curtin & Johnson, Inc.

117 F. Supp. 830 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 1954

United States Electric Lighting Co. v. Sullivan, 22 App.D.C. 115 . *831 It is claimed by the plaintiff, however, that the case of Hitaffer v.

Olson v. Clinton

602 F. Supp. 2d 93 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2009

Holy Land Found. for Relief and Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156 (D.C.Cir.2003) (citing Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138, 142 , 93 S.Ct. 1241 , 36 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973)); Richards v. … See Ackerman v.

United States v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 20, 2022

Brown’s Pro Se Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 40 (“Repl.”) … See United States v. Brown, 2:21- mj-30325 (E.D. Mich. July 1, 2021) (minute entry).

Brown v. United States

299 F.2d 468 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 8, 1962