Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

0.40s

  • Opinion No. 70-178 (1970) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 7, 1970

    STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS — EXPENSES — EMPLOYEES The State Board of Medical Examiners is not limited in the expenses it may pay an employee by the provisions of 74 O.S. 500 .1 [ 74-500.1 ] through 74 O.S. 500 .11 [ … In the case of Citizens' State Bank of Vici v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Knights & Ladies of Security v. Grey

    70 Okla. 79 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1918

    E. 69 ; Weiss v. Swift & Co., 36 Pa. Super. Cf. 376; Strange v. Board of Com’rs, 173 Ind. 340 , 91 N. E. 242 ; State v. Brown et al., 163 Mo. App. 30 , 145 S. W. 1180 ; Mears Mining Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 162 Mo. … Webber v. Chicago, 148 Ill. 313 -318, 36 N. E. 70 ; Gillock v. People, 171 Ill. 307 , 49 N. E. 712 ; Winters v. Duluth 82 Minn. 127 , 84 N. W. 788 ; Lynch v. Murphy, 119 Mo. 163 , 24 S. W. 774 ; Woodworth v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-191 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 20, 1976

    In Delaware County Excise Board v. St. Louis v. San Francisco Railroad Company, 49 P.2d 523 , the Supreme Court discussed the levy of the gasoline tax and its purpose: ". . . … Board of County Commissioners of Harmon County v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1978) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 26, 1978

    This was noted by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma in Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Company v. State Board of Equalization, 174 Okl. 320 , 49 P.2d 1089 (1935) and Sinclair Prairie Oil Company v. … In so ruling, the Court viewed that the duty to establish a method of valuation is with the State Board of Equalization and it is within the discretion of said Board to determine such a method.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-295 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1976

    Board, but only after the Board, by a majority vote thereof, shall have authorized and directed such performance by said Chairman." … This interpretation is consistent with the general rule that statutory grants of authority to Boards of County Commissioners are strictly construed. See Allen, et al. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Verschoyle v. McDaniels

    127 Okla. 166 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1927

    In the case of Gilmore v. … Wagnon v. Davison. 79 Okla. 209 , 129 Pac. 565 ; McDonnell v. Continental Supply Co., 79 Okla. 286 , 193 Pac. 524 ; Hall v. Bank of Commerce, 80 Okla. 40 , 193 Pac. 990 ; Brown v. Parks, 80 Okla. 184 , 195 Pac. 133 .

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • National Surety Co. v. State Ex Rel. Richards

    111 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1925

    The first, second, third, and fourth propositions here presented are similar to corresponding propositions presented in National Surety Company v. … for the use and benefit of the board of county commissioners.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-180 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 25, 1968

    that had such officers been in a meeting of the Board they would have voted to ask for the opinion as a Board. … In the case of Draper v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Seibold v. City of Muskogee

    161 Okla. 241 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1932

    In Stoner v. … M., K. & T. v. City of Tulsa, 113 Okla. 21 , 238 P. 452 ; Grier v. Tulsa, 143 Okla. 244 , 288 P. 957 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Tulsa, 15 Fed. (2d) 960.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1990)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 13, 1990

    NEWLY ELECTED DIRECTORS AND THOSE APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR TO THE BOARD SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE ORGANIZATIONAL AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD FOLLOWING THE ANNUAL MEETING AS HEREIN SET FORTH." … BURFORD V. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF LINCOLN COUNTY, 162 P. 780 , 782 (OKLA. 1917).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • White v. State

    4 Okla. Crim. 143 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1910

    In the case of Blair v. … In George v. United States, 1 Okla.

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Red Eagle v. Free

    191 Okla. 385 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1942

    Overton v. Overton, 121 Okla. 1 , 246 P. 1095 ; Brown v. Brown, 104 Okla. 206 , 230 P. 853 . … CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, and HURST, JJ., absent.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ryan v. Sarkeys

    113 Okla. 76 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1925

    Brown v. Parks, 80 Okla. 184 , 195 Pac. 133 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sackett v. Rose

    55 Okla. 398 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1916

    Gen. v. Brown, 1 Wis. 513 ; Atty. Gen. v. Railway Co., 35 Wis. 425 ; Mason v. City of Ashland, 98 Wis. 540 , 74 N. W. 357 . … Co. v. Malone, 116 Ala. 600 , 22 South. 897 ; Dyer v. Brogan, 70 Cal. 136 , 11 Pac. 589 ; Wilkinson v. Carter, 22 Neb. 186 , 34 N. W. 351 ; Town of Woodville v. Harrison, 73 Wis. 360 , 41 N. W. 529 ; Lowry v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Nantz v. Nantz

    749 P.2d 1137 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1988

    NANTZ, Appellant, v. Patricia Ann NANTZ, Appellee. No. 62029. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. February 2, 1988. As Corrected February 3, 1988. Dan R. Brown, Lawton, for appellant. John N. … Board of Regents of Oklahoma Colleges, Okl., 535 P.2d 295, 298 [1975], citing Graham v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • McManus v. State

    695 P.2d 884 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 1985

    Westerman v. State, 525 P.2d 1359 (Okl.Cr.1974). … Webster v. State, 96 Okl.Cr. 44 , 248 P.2d 646 (1952). Improper questioning by the prosecutor is also complained of in this case.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 2001

    of the State Board of Agriculture. … Cox v. Dawson, 911 P.2d 272 , 276 (Okla. 1996) (footnote omitted). ¶ 4 It is, therefore, the official Opinion of the Attorney General that: 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-245 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 8, 1968

    Arkansas Amusement Corporation v. Kempner, 182 Ark. 897 , 33 S.W.2d 42 ;Morgan v. Tennessee Valley Authority, C.C A. Tenn., 115 F.2d 990 ; Tucker v. State, 218 Ind. 614 , 35 N.E.2d 270 . … Crable v. Carter, 187 Okl. 421 , 103 P.2d 518 ; Simpson v. Hill, 128 Okl. 269 , 263 P. 635 , 56 A.L.R. 706 ; Giss v. Jordan, 82 Ariz. 152 , 309 P.2d 779 , 16 C.J.S. Constitutional Law, Section 130.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cannon v. Lane

    867 P.2d 1235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1993

    James v. … Williamson v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Bowles v. Perkinson

    85 Okla. 244 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1922

    Cases upon this question are reviewed in the case of Bodine v. McDaniel Auto Co., 69 Oklahoma 170 Pac. 899 , and Estus, County Clerk, v. State, 83 Okla. 181 , 200 Pac. 1002 ; Clark, State Highway Com’r, v. Warner, Co. … over the board in allowing claims.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.