Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.40s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 7, 1970
STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS — EXPENSES — EMPLOYEES The State Board of Medical Examiners is not limited in the expenses it may pay an employee by the provisions of 74 O.S. 500 .1 [ 74-500.1 ] through 74 O.S. 500 .11 [ … In the case of Citizens' State Bank of Vici v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKnights & Ladies of Security v. Grey
70 Okla. 79 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1918
E. 69 ; Weiss v. Swift & Co., 36 Pa. Super. Cf. 376; Strange v. Board of Com’rs, 173 Ind. 340 , 91 N. E. 242 ; State v. Brown et al., 163 Mo. App. 30 , 145 S. W. 1180 ; Mears Mining Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 162 Mo. … Webber v. Chicago, 148 Ill. 313 -318, 36 N. E. 70 ; Gillock v. People, 171 Ill. 307 , 49 N. E. 712 ; Winters v. Duluth 82 Minn. 127 , 84 N. W. 788 ; Lynch v. Murphy, 119 Mo. 163 , 24 S. W. 774 ; Woodworth v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 20, 1976
In Delaware County Excise Board v. St. Louis v. San Francisco Railroad Company, 49 P.2d 523 , the Supreme Court discussed the levy of the gasoline tax and its purpose: ". . . … Board of County Commissioners of Harmon County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 26, 1978
This was noted by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma in Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Company v. State Board of Equalization, 174 Okl. 320 , 49 P.2d 1089 (1935) and Sinclair Prairie Oil Company v. … In so ruling, the Court viewed that the duty to establish a method of valuation is with the State Board of Equalization and it is within the discretion of said Board to determine such a method.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1976
Board, but only after the Board, by a majority vote thereof, shall have authorized and directed such performance by said Chairman." … This interpretation is consistent with the general rule that statutory grants of authority to Boards of County Commissioners are strictly construed. See Allen, et al. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished127 Okla. 166 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1927
In the case of Gilmore v. … Wagnon v. Davison. 79 Okla. 209 , 129 Pac. 565 ; McDonnell v. Continental Supply Co., 79 Okla. 286 , 193 Pac. 524 ; Hall v. Bank of Commerce, 80 Okla. 40 , 193 Pac. 990 ; Brown v. Parks, 80 Okla. 184 , 195 Pac. 133 .
Cited 18 timesPublishedNational Surety Co. v. State Ex Rel. Richards
111 Okla. 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1925
The first, second, third, and fourth propositions here presented are similar to corresponding propositions presented in National Surety Company v. … for the use and benefit of the board of county commissioners.
Cited 18 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 25, 1968
that had such officers been in a meeting of the Board they would have voted to ask for the opinion as a Board. … In the case of Draper v.
Cited 0 timesPublished161 Okla. 241 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1932
In Stoner v. … M., K. & T. v. City of Tulsa, 113 Okla. 21 , 238 P. 452 ; Grier v. Tulsa, 143 Okla. 244 , 288 P. 957 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Tulsa, 15 Fed. (2d) 960.
Cited 3 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 13, 1990
NEWLY ELECTED DIRECTORS AND THOSE APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR TO THE BOARD SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE ORGANIZATIONAL AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD FOLLOWING THE ANNUAL MEETING AS HEREIN SET FORTH." … BURFORD V. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF LINCOLN COUNTY, 162 P. 780 , 782 (OKLA. 1917).
Cited 0 timesPublished4 Okla. Crim. 143 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1910
In the case of Blair v. … In George v. United States, 1 Okla.
Cited 50 timesPublished191 Okla. 385 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1942
Overton v. Overton, 121 Okla. 1 , 246 P. 1095 ; Brown v. Brown, 104 Okla. 206 , 230 P. 853 . … CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, and HURST, JJ., absent.
Cited 5 timesPublished113 Okla. 76 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1925
Brown v. Parks, 80 Okla. 184 , 195 Pac. 133 .
Cited 1 timesPublished55 Okla. 398 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1916
Gen. v. Brown, 1 Wis. 513 ; Atty. Gen. v. Railway Co., 35 Wis. 425 ; Mason v. City of Ashland, 98 Wis. 540 , 74 N. W. 357 . … Co. v. Malone, 116 Ala. 600 , 22 South. 897 ; Dyer v. Brogan, 70 Cal. 136 , 11 Pac. 589 ; Wilkinson v. Carter, 22 Neb. 186 , 34 N. W. 351 ; Town of Woodville v. Harrison, 73 Wis. 360 , 41 N. W. 529 ; Lowry v.
Cited 33 timesPublished749 P.2d 1137 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1988
NANTZ, Appellant, v. Patricia Ann NANTZ, Appellee. No. 62029. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. February 2, 1988. As Corrected February 3, 1988. Dan R. Brown, Lawton, for appellant. John N. … Board of Regents of Oklahoma Colleges, Okl., 535 P.2d 295, 298 [1975], citing Graham v.
Cited 19 timesPublished695 P.2d 884 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 1985
Westerman v. State, 525 P.2d 1359 (Okl.Cr.1974). … Webster v. State, 96 Okl.Cr. 44 , 248 P.2d 646 (1952). Improper questioning by the prosecutor is also complained of in this case.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 2001
of the State Board of Agriculture. … Cox v. Dawson, 911 P.2d 272 , 276 (Okla. 1996) (footnote omitted). ¶ 4 It is, therefore, the official Opinion of the Attorney General that: 1.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 8, 1968
Arkansas Amusement Corporation v. Kempner, 182 Ark. 897 , 33 S.W.2d 42 ;Morgan v. Tennessee Valley Authority, C.C A. Tenn., 115 F.2d 990 ; Tucker v. State, 218 Ind. 614 , 35 N.E.2d 270 . … Crable v. Carter, 187 Okl. 421 , 103 P.2d 518 ; Simpson v. Hill, 128 Okl. 269 , 263 P. 635 , 56 A.L.R. 706 ; Giss v. Jordan, 82 Ariz. 152 , 309 P.2d 779 , 16 C.J.S. Constitutional Law, Section 130.
Cited 0 timesPublished867 P.2d 1235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1993
James v. … Williamson v.
Cited 18 timesPublished85 Okla. 244 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1922
Cases upon this question are reviewed in the case of Bodine v. McDaniel Auto Co., 69 Oklahoma 170 Pac. 899 , and Estus, County Clerk, v. State, 83 Okla. 181 , 200 Pac. 1002 ; Clark, State Highway Com’r, v. Warner, Co. … over the board in allowing claims.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna