Case law

Fields v. McCloud

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 29, 2020

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 612, 613 (6th Cir. … LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013); see also Brown v. R.I., 511 F.

Smiley v. Mayor of Chattanooga

53 Tenn. 604 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1871

Franklin, who was a member of the Board of Aldermen, and also of its Committee on Health and Hospitals, at the time and in pursuance of authority given him by the board; but the witness stated that the contract was not signed … See also Williams v.

Roach, Carlton v. Grouper Holdings, LLC, a/k/a Aludyne North America

2024 TN WC 50 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 17, 2024

Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2023); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Grouper Holdings successfully meets one of those burdens, Mr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

William Horton v. Dept. of Correction

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 12, 1999

In addition to the board itself, the proper parties to a certiorari proceeding are the individuals or entitles who were parties to the dispute at the board level. Levy v. … Gilley v. Jernigan, 597 S.W.2d 313, 318 (Tenn. Ct. App. 197 9). -5- approves the board’s recommendation. Mandela v.

General Oils Company, Division of Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Claude Ramsey, Assessor of Property for Hamilton County, Tennessee and TN State Board of Equalization

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 12, 1996

Presley v. Bennett, 860 S.W.2d 857, 859 (Tenn. 1993). … Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. King, 678 S.W.2d 19, 23 (Tenn. 1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1075 (1985); Tennessee Manufactured Hous. Ass’n v. Metro Gov't, 798 S.W.2d 254, 257 (Tenn. App. 1990).

Thomas Krajenta v. Volker Paul Westphal

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 27, 2022

(emphasis added); Deaderick v. … ,” and depleted corporate assets, Bourne v.

Underwood v. Zurich Insurance Co.

854 S.W.2d 94 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 10, 1993

See Banks, supra, 817 S.W.2d at 18 ; Brown v. Consolidated Coal Co., 518 S.W.2d 234 (Tenn.1974). There is only one reported workers’ compensation case in Tennessee, Brown v. … In the recent case of Livingston v.

State of Tennessee v. Takeita M. Locke

90 S.W.3d 663 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2002

State v . Burns, 6 S.W.3d 453, 464 (Tenn. 1999) (quoting State v. Langford, 994 S.W.2d 126, 128 (Tenn. 1999)). … Recently, in State v.

Washington, John v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc.

2021 TN WC App. 74 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 15, 2021

Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). … Young v. Barrow, 130 S.W.3d 59, 64 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).

Hughes v. Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co.

6 Tenn. App. 432 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 30, 1927

Also the following cases: Givney v. Nat’l Jewelers Board of Trade, 144 N. Y. Supp., 321 ; Feiber v. Home Silk Mills, 143 N. Y. Supp., 1014 ; Cuppy v. Stowlwerk Bros., 143 N. Y. Supp., 967 ; Chadwick *442 v. … App., 569 ; Brookfield v. Drewry College, 139 Mo. App., 339 , 123 S.

Harrison v. McMillan

109 Tenn. 77 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1902

as for the board, and that it would be their duty to ascertain from the testimony what would be a reasonable charge for the nursing as well as for the board. … That it was error on the trial of the case in the circuit court to allow testimony of a canse of action not embraced in the warrant is shown by the case of Watkins v. Kittrell, 3 Baxt., 38 . And see Sale v.

Mullins v. State

202 Tenn. 354 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 3, 1957

The plaintiff in error relies upon Brown v. Barker, 10 Humph. 346 , 29 Tenn. 346 . This case is a civil case and as stated in the brief and in oral argument applies the general rule above quoted from C.J.S. … We think in view of the holding of this Court (it is true it was on divided opinion but still it is the law of the State) that any holding to the contrary in Brown v. Barker, supra, is overruled.

State of Tennessee v. Jamie Lee McKinney

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 13, 2010

Thus, “[t]he only procedure for a prisoner to obtain judicial review of an action or decision of the Board is by a petition for common-law writ of certiorari.” Hickman v. Tenn. … See State v.

In Re: Petition To Stay The Effectiveness of Formal Ethics Opinion 2017-F-163

Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 23, 2019

Bar Ass’n v. … In United States v.

Freeman, Wayne v. United Road Services, Inc.

2026 TN WC App. 2 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 6, 2026

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Wayne Freeman Docket No. 2024-50-8550 v. … See, e.g., Hernandez v. Jones Fiber Products, LLC, No. 2019-02-0046, 2020 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 72, at *18-19 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Dec. 28, 2020) (quoting Kelly v.

Regions Bank v. The Blumberg Trust

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 21, 2020

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 18 S.W.3d at 190-91 (Tenn. 2000). … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 18 S.W.3d at 191.

Papachristou v. University of Tennessee

29 S.W.3d 487 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 29, 2000

Clay County Manor, Inc. v. State of Tennessee, 849 S.W.2d 755, 759 (Tenn. -5- 1993) (quoting Southern Railway Co. v. … Bryant v. Tennessee State Board of Accountancy, No. 01A01-9303-CH-00088, Davidson County (Tenn. Ct. App. filed September 1, 1993 at Nashville) (citing Metropolitan Gov’t. of Nashville v.

In re Estate of John J. Burnette

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 16, 2016

Similarly, in Brown v. Daly, 884 S.W.2d 121, 124 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994), we held that a local rule regarding a demand for a jury trial conflicted with Tenn. R. Civ. P. 38.02. … Brown, 884 S.W.2d at 123-24; accord First Citizens Bank of Cleveland v. Cross, No. 03A01-9806-CH-00203, 1999 WL 76079, at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App.

Fitzpatrick v. Morgan Southern, Inc.

261 F. Supp. 2d 978 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Apr 21, 2003

Drivers Assoc., Inc. v. … Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def.

Union & Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. Evans

8 Tenn. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 22, 1928

It is the insistence of the defendant that where usury appears upon the face of the note sued on, usury need not be pleaded' (citing Richardson v. Brown, 68 Tenn., 242 ; Bang v. Windmill Co., 96 Tenn., 365 ). … But this holding- has been expressly disapproved in Richardson v. Brown, 9 Baxter, 242 -249, as not in harmony with our laws defining usury.”