Case law

Ali

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 21, 2026

Defendant North Carolina State Board of Elections filed a motion to dismiss on February 5, 2026 [DE 11]. However, plaintiff subsequently filed an amended complaint, [DE 26], rendering that motion moot. Fawzy v. … v. Dep t of Educ., 639 F.3d 91. 108 (4th Cir. 2011).

State Ex Rel. Meador v. Thomas

205 N.C. 142 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 12, 1933

(Ewart v. Jones, 116 N. … Vide S. v. Gales, 77 N. C., 283 ; White v. Murray, 126 N.

Ward v. . Elizabeth City

121 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897

The Legislature at its discretion can abolish Counties, Mills v. Williams, 33 N. C., 558 , and of course cities and towns, Lilly v. Taylor, 88 N. C., 489 , Merriwether v. Garrett, 102 U. … Williams v. Somers, 18 N. C., 61 . No error.

Lunn v. . Shermer

93 N.C. 164 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1885

In Brown v. … Brown v. Jones, supra.

State v. Owen

242 N.C. 525 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 26, 1955

See also James v. Sutton, 229 N.C. 515 , 50 S.E. 2d 300 ; Rhodes, Inc., v. Raleigh, 217 N.C. 627 , 9 S.E. 2d 389 ; S. v. Dannenberg, 150 N.C. 799 , 63 S.E. 946 . … McGillic v. Corby, 37 Mont. 249 , 95 P. 1063 ; 37 Am. Jur., Municipal Corporations, Sec. 168. See also Frank J. Durkin Lumber Co. v. Fitzsimmons, 106 N.J.L. 183 , 147 A. 555 ; Borshesky v. Board *529 of Works, 8 N. J.

State v. Cobb

Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 2022

STATE V. … v.

Osborne v. . Canton and Kinsland v. . MacKey

219 N.C. 139 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1941

Howerton v. Tate , 68 N.C. 546 ; Kreitz v. Behrensmeyer (Ill.), 36 N.E. 983 ; Booker v. Donohoe (Va.), 28 S.E. 584 . In Howerton v. … In Kreitz v.

Haugh v. County of Durham

365 N.C. 328 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 25, 2011

Russell Capps v. COUNTY OF DURHAM, Ellen W. Reckhow, Chairman of the Durham County Board of Commissioners, in her official capacity, Michael D. … Page, Vice-Chairman of the Durham County Board of Commissioners, in his official capacity; and Lewis A. Cheek, Phillip R. Cousin, Jr., and Becky M.

Sapp v. Yadkin County

209 N.C. App. 430 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 1, 2011

I, L.P. v. Andrews Co., 128 N.C. … Childress v. Yadkin County, 186 N.C.

In the Matter of Society for Preservation of Historic Oakwood

571 S.E.2d 588 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 5, 2002

Raleigh Rescue Mission, Inc., and Coggins Construction Company, Petitioners, v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Raleigh, The Society for the Preservation of Historic Oakwood and Mozelle Jones, Respondents. No. … See Midgette v.

Moore v. Wykle

107 N.C. App. 120 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 4, 1992

Feezor v. Siceloff, 232 N.C. 563 , 61 S.E.2d 714 [(1950)]; Board of Education v. Lewis, 231 N.C. 661 , 58 S.E.2d 725 [(1950)]; Waldrop v. Hodges, 230 N.C. 370 , 53 S.E.2d 263 [(1949)]; Atkins v. … However, as pointed out in Atkins v.

Sigmon v. Poe

381 F. Supp. 387 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 5, 1974

It is believed that these legal conclusions are supported by the following decisions: Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. … Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Johnson v. Fraley, 470 F.2d 179 (4th Cir. 1972); Whitney v. Board of Regents, 355 F.Supp. 321 (E.D.Wis. 1973); Kennedy v.

Rose v. . R. G. Franklin

216 N.C. 289 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1939

Brown v. *291 House, 118 N. C., 870 , 24 S. E., 786 ; Power Co. v. Savage, 170 N. C., 625 , 87 S. E., 629 , and numerous other decisions. … Likewise, as stated by Brown, J., in Wall v. Wall, 142 N. C., 387 , 55 S.

State v. . Dudley

182 N.C. 822 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 26, 1921

But if it be conceded that the board in question here, the Fisheries Commission Board, as a mere administrative board does not come within the exception stated, it is firmly established in this jurisdiction and fully recognized … Morgan v. Stewart, 144 N. C., 424 , citing S. v. Hay, 126 N. C., 999 ; Hutchins v. Durham, 137 N. C., 68 ; Morris v. Columbus, 102 Ga., 792 . And in Express Co. v. R. R., 111 N.

Dunn v. Pate

98 N.C. App. 351 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 1, 1990

Boone v. Brown, 11 N.C. App. 355, 357 , 181 S.E.2d 157, 158 (1971), and cases cited therein. The certificate must be attached or annexed to the deed. See Caldwell v. … In State v.

State v. Dew

240 N.C. 595 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1954

Tar Heel Bond Co. v. Krider, 218 N.C. 361 , 11 S.E. 2d 291 ; S. v. Brown, 218 N.C. 368 , 11 S.E. 2d 294 . … S. v. Bradsher, 189 N.C. 401 , 127 S.E. 349 ; S. v. Clarke, 222 N.C. 744 , 24 S.E. 2d 619 ; Tar Heel Bond Co. v. Krider, supra; S. v. Brown, supra.

Galligan v. Town of Chapel Hill

276 N.C. 172 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 6, 1970

As stated in Croom v. … McIlhenney v. Wilmington, 127 N.C. 146 , 37 S.E. 187 , 50 L.R.A. 470 ; Parks v. Princeton, 217 N.C. 361 , 8 S.E. 2d 217 ; Gentry v. Hot Springs, 227 N.C. 665 , 44 S.E. 2d 85 .”

London v. Commissioners

193 N.C. 100 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 1927

Miller v. Groome, 109 N. C., 148 ; Dumas v. Morrison, 175 N. C., 431 ; Caldwell v. Robinson, 179 N. C., 518 ; Hardy v. Thornton, 192 N. C., 296 ; Greer v. Comrs., 192 N. C., 714 . … C., 45 ; Fore v. Feimster, 171 N. C., 551 ; Wright v. Kinney, 123 N. C., 618 . Did the commissioners act in their official capacity upon the question of this supplemental contract?

Sondley v. City of Asheville

110 N.C. 84 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1892

Walker v. Scott, 104 N. C., 481 ; Barcroft v. Roberts, 92 N. C., 249 . … State v. James, 108 N. C., 792 , and Porter v. Railroad, 106 N. C., 478 .

James v. . Sutton

229 N.C. 515 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1948

That power cannot be delegated to the Board of Adjustment. … We so held in Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N. C. 107 , 37 S. E. (2) 128, and we adhere to that decision.