Case law

Beberman v. U.S. Department of State

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 2019

See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … See Brown v. Fed. Election Comm’n, 386 F. Supp. 3d 16, 33 (D.D.C. 2019).

Ali v. D.C. Court Services

538 F. Supp. 2d 157 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 2008

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). III. ANALYSIS A. … For example, absolute immunity applies to the acts of parole officers and the acts of government officials taken at the direction of or to assist the parole board. Turner v.

Walsh v. Hagee

900 F. Supp. 2d 51 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 26, 2012

Walsh, then, had to hand-deliver the application to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (“BCNR”). Id. ¶ 41–43. … Peavey v. Holder, 657 F. Supp. 2d 180, 185 (D.D.C. 2009 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)). A Rule 12(b)(6) motion tests the legal sufficiency of a complaint. Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.

District of Columbia v. Zukerberg

880 A.2d 276 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 11, 2005

Co. v. James G. Davis Constr. … See Lacy v.

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. President of Georgetown College

483 F. Supp. 1142 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 7, 1980

United States v. Seckinger, 397 U.S. 203, 216 , 90 S.Ct. 880, 888 , 25 L.Ed.2d 224 (1970). This canon of construction has been vigorously applied in insurance cases. See Imperial Insurance, Inc. v. … Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 376 F.Supp. 901, 906 (W.D.Okl. 1973).

Battery Patents Corporation v. Coe

93 F.2d 220 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 13, 1937

The Board affirmed the .decision of the Examiner. … In the case of Smith v. Whitman Saddle Company, 148 U.S. 674 , at page 679, 13 S.Ct. 768, 770 , 37 L.Ed. 606 , the Supreme Court of the United States quoted with approval the language of Mr. Justice Brown in Northup v.

Mitchell v. Yates

402 F. Supp. 2d 222 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 18, 2005

See Brown v. … See Board of Trustees of Univ. of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 366 , 121 S.Ct. 955 , 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001) (quoting Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., 473 U.S. 432, 446 , 105 S.Ct. 3249 , 87 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985)).

Bobreski v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

284 F. Supp. 2d 67 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2003

The ALJ then concluded, based on a 2000 Administrative Review Board (“ARB”) decision and Department regulations, that she had inherent authority to issue subpoenas. Id. at 2-3 (citing 29 C.F.R. § 18.24 (d); Childers v. … Food & Drug Admin. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132-33 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000); S. Calif. Edison, 195 F.3d at 23 . In addition, the court may look to legislative history.

United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

566 F.3d 1095 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 22, 2009

E.g., FTC v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 778 F.2d 35, 41–42 & n.3 (D.C. Cir. 1985). We find none. … V.

Tilbrook v. Forrestal

65 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 3, 1946

The War Contracts Price Adjustment Board was created by a later enactment. … Deering, 254 U.S. 443, 464 , 41 S.Ct. 172 , 65 L.Ed. 349 , 16 A.L.R. 196 ; Texas Co. v. Brown, 258 U.S. 466, 474 , 42 S.Ct. 375 , 66 L.Ed. 721 .

Hawkins v. Hall

537 A.2d 571 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1988

Kilian v. … Relying on Vaca v.

In Re DSA

283 A.2d 829 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1971

United States v. Manglona, 414 F.2d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 1969); Chapman v. United States, 346 F.2d 383, 388 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 909 , 86 S.Ct. 249 , 15 L.Ed.2d 161 (1965); Comins v. … United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 240 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967); Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.

Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Tns, Inc., Johnny Bettis, Intervenors. Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

806 F.2d 269 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 2, 1986

Mahon v. NLRB, No. 85-7565 (9th Cir.1985); Roadway Express, Inc. v. … See FED.R.CIV.P. 23(e); Armstrong v.

Bennett v. United States Parole Commission

41 F. Supp. 3d 47 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 12, 2014

.”); United States v. … Maddox v. Elzie, 238 F.3d 437, 445 (D.C.Cir.2001); see Hardy v.

Jones v. Greenspan

402 F. Supp. 2d 294 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 2005

Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8 , 13 *298 (D.C.Cir.1985) (stating that “because untimely exhaustion of administrative remedies is an affirmative defense, the defendant bears the burden of pleading and proving it”). … Stewart v. Evans, 275 F.3d 1126, 1134 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999)).

Matter of Hudock

544 A.2d 707 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1988

The State Board’s action was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Virginia. Hudock v. Virginia State Bar, 233 Va. 390 , 355 S.E. 2d 601 (1987). … See Hudock v. Industrial Commission of Virginia, 1 Va.App. 474 , 340 S.E.2d 168 (1986). 1 .

Beeman v. Middendorf

425 F. Supp. 713 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 18, 1977

Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976), Mandates that the Fifth Amendment Claim be Dismissed. … In asserting that plaintiff’s fifth amendment claim is also barred because Title VII provides her exclusive remedy, defendant relies on the recent case of Brown v.

Whitlock v. U.S. Department of Defense

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 6, 2025

Id.; see Brown v. EPA, 384 F. Supp. 2d 271, 279 (D.D.C. 2005) (“[T]he D.C. … But the mere fact that a pool of potential jurors (or here, Board of Inquiry members) might be exposed to publicity about a case—“even per[v]asive, adverse publicity”— does not satisfy Exemption 7(B)’s high standard.

National Petrochemical & Refiners Ass'n v. Environmental Protection Agency

643 F.3d 958 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 21, 2010

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY , RESPONDENT GROWTH ENERGY AND NATIONAL BIODIESEL BOARD , INTERVENORS Consolidated with No. 10-1071 On Petitions for … Barnhart v.

Hugh Kaufman v. Thomas Perez

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 14, 2014

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 455 (D.C. … The limitations for this claim, Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446 (D.C. Cir. 1999), appears to have been superseded on that point by a later Supreme Court decision. See Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. v.