Case law

In Re Ferber

703 A.2d 142 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1997

ORDER PER CURIAM: The Board on Professional Responsibility (the “Board”) recommends that respondent, Mark S. … Massachusetts of thirty-three counts of mail and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 ,1343, and 1346 (1994), and twenty-five counts of violations of the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952 (1994). 1 See United States v.

Grant v. Entm't Cruises, Inc.

282 F. Supp. 3d 114 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 16, 2017

This is no easy task as much of the factual recitation is jumbled, and what actually happened on board the ship is not easily discerned. Plaintiff, who served in the U.S. … See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc. , 789 F.3d 146 , 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). Rule 12(b)(6)'s pleading standard is "not meant to impose a great burden upon a plaintiff," Dura Pharm., Inc. v.

District of Columbia v. Straus

607 F. Supp. 2d 180 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 14, 2009

S.A. v. … In Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v.

Horsey v. United States Department of State

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 2016

HORSEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 14-cv-1568 (KBJ) … DATE: October 28, 2016 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

District of Columbia v. Zukerberg

880 A.2d 276 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 11, 2005

Co. v. James G. Davis Constr. … See Lacy v.

Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Continental Air Lines, Inc., Braniff Airways, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., Intervenors

247 F.2d 562 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 9, 1957

Eastern Air Lines v. C. A. B., supra, 243 F.2d at page 609. … Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. F. C. C., 1945, 326 U.S. 327 , 66 S.Ct. 148 , 90 L.Ed. 108 . 2 . Eastern Air Lines v. C. A. B., 100 U.S.App.D.C. 184 , 243 F.2d 607 . 3 . Eastern Air Lines v. !. A. B., supra, note 2.

Nat. Cmty. Reinvestment Reinvestment Coalition v. Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co

597 F. Supp. 2d 120 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2009

Defendants argue that Brown v. Artery Organization, Inc., 654 F.Supp. 1106 (D.D.C.1987), demonstrates a split on the D.C. District Court. … (“Brown did not hold, as defendants contend, that disparate impact claims were never available under the FHA.

Tate v. Escher

33 F.2d 556 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 1929

Recognizing the duties and authority thus conferred upon the Alien Property Custodian, Congress in the Act of May 16, 1928, 45 Stat. 574 , making appropriations for the executive office and executive bureaus, boards, commissions … United States v. Moore, 95 U. S. 760 , 24 L. Ed. 588 ; Brown v. United States, 113 U. S. 568 , 5 S. Ct. 648 , 28 L. Ed. 1079 ; United States v. Johnston, 124 U. S. 236 , 8 S. Ct. 446 , 31 L. Ed. 389 ; Robertson v.

In Re Morrell

684 A.2d 361 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1996

V. … Morrell cites two cases, In re Dwyer, 399 A.2d 1 (D.C.1979), and Eilers v.

Smith v. Smith

256 A.2d 833 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1969

Brown v. Brown, supra. Thus, since Jones had a living wife at the time, his marriage to appellee in 1930 was void, and therefore she was free to marry appellant. … Harsley v. United States, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 160, 151 , 187 F.2d 213, 214 (1951). New York has the same rule. See Brown v. Brown, 51 Misc.2d 839 , 274 N.Y.S.2d 484 (1966). 2 . Wheeler v.

Battery Patents Corporation v. Coe

93 F.2d 220 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 13, 1937

The Board affirmed the .decision of the Examiner. … In the case of Smith v. Whitman Saddle Company, 148 U.S. 674 , at page 679, 13 S.Ct. 768, 770 , 37 L.Ed. 606 , the Supreme Court of the United States quoted with approval the language of Mr. Justice Brown in Northup v.

Plummer v. Bottling Group, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2023

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Brown v. Potomac Elec. Power Co., 306 F. Supp. 3d 194, 199 (D.D.C. 2018) (quoting Lingle v. Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399, 403 (1988)) (second alteration in original).

Crews v. United States

389 A.2d 277 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1978

Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 601 n.6, 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2261 , 45 L.Ed.2d *285 416 (1975). … As the Court indicated in Brown v.

Davidson v. District of Columbia

736 F. Supp. 2d 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 2010

See Brown ex rel. P.L. v. Barbara Jordan Pub. Charter Sch., 495 F.Supp.2d 1, 2 (D.D.C.2007); Armstrong v. Vance, 328 F.Supp.2d 50, 54-55 (D.D.C.2004); Kaseman v. … Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002).

In Re Scanio

919 A.2d 1137 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2007

V. Conclusion We uphold the Board’s conclusion that respondent violated Rule 8.4(c) but conclude that a thirty-day suspension is warranted. … Parker v. Levy, 417 U.S. 733, 756 , 94 S.Ct. 2547 , 41 L.Ed.2d 439 (1974). 5 .

Graves v. United States

472 A.2d 395 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1984

judge, who tried Brown. … We hold merely that his argument, supporting his refusal to testify at the Brown trial, was premature. Under Kastigar v.

Brunotte v. Tangherlini

892 F. Supp. 2d 199 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2012

Augustus v. McHugh, 825 F. … See Laningham v. United States Navy, 813 F.2d 1236, 1242-43 (D.C. Cir. 1987). Furthermore, the record indicates that GPO only began to consider rescinding Plaintiff's job offer after Mannion contacted Brown.

In re Winstead

69 A.3d 390 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 2013

See Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 558 , 94 S.Ct. 2968 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974) (“The touchstone of due process is protection of the individual against arbitrary action of government.” … See Dyas v. United States, 376 A.2d 827, 832 (D.C.1977). . Respondent strenuously maintains that she did not engage in the unauthorized practice of law.

District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. Fraternal Order of Police/Metropolitan Police Department Labor Committee

997 A.2d 65 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 2010

MPD appealed the award to the District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board (“PERB” or “the Board”), and the Board entered an order affirming the award. … Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla., 457 U.S. 496 , 515 n. 19, 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982) (quotation marks omitted).

Dome Patent, L.P. v. Rea

59 F. Supp. 3d 52 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2014

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Philip Morris Inc., 229 F.3d at 1130. … See, e.g., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Philip Morris Inc., 229 F.3d at 1130. Moreover, fact-finders in patent cases are instructed to take an “expansive and flexible approach” when considering obviousness.