Case law

Town of Luther v. Crossley

45 Okla. 611 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1915

In the case of Bridgman et al. v. … Roberts, Mayor, 40 Okla. 495 , 139 Pac. 518 , the plaintiffs in error were members of the board of commissioners of the city of Ardmore, by virtue of the provisions of the charter of said city, which provided that the board

Caffey v. Veale

193 Okla. 444 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 1944

V. … Caffey then presented the minutes of a meeting of the board on May 7, 1943, at which time he presented his bond, and we quote a portion of this exhibit which sufficiently shows the action of the board: “Bond — W. V.

Opinion No. 68-368 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 1968

the proper election board. … Hampton v. Oakes, Okl., 281 P.2d 749 (1955).

Eason v. Walter

118 Okla. 37 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1926

Franks v. Reeder, 101 Okla. 18 , 223 Pac. 126 ; Robert v. Howerton et al., 56 Okla. 555 , 156 Pac. 329 ; Logan v. Brown, 20 Okla. 334 , 95 Pac. 441 , 20 L. R. A. (N. S.) 298; Shippey v. … See also, Dikeman et al. v. Arnold (Mien.) 40 N. W. 42 ; Cannon v. Handley (Cal.) 13 Pac. 315 ; Francis v. Francis (Mich.) 106 N. W. 864 ; Hollabaugh v. Taylor (Ark.) 204 S. W. 628 ; Moore, Keppel & Co. v. Ward (W.

Opinion No. 72-120 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 13, 1972

See also Haslett v. Board of Commissioners of Muskogee County, 168 Okl. 290 , 32 P.2d 940 (1934) and Board of County Commissioners of Harmon County v. King, 194 Okl. 593 , 153 P.2d 483 (1944). … See also Haslett v. Board of Commissioners of Muskogee County, 168 Okl. 290 , 32 P.2d 940 (1934) and Board of County Commissioners of Harmon County v. King, 194 Okl. 593 , 153 P.2d 483 (1944).

Stout v. Schell

206 Okla. 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1952

Co. v. Rogers, 60 Okla. 249 , 159 P. 1132 ; Buxton v. Hicks, Adm’x, 191 Okla. 573 , 131 P. 2d 1015 ; Riter-Conley Mfg. Co. v. O’Donnell, 64 Okla. 229 , 168 P. 49 ; Producers’ & Refiners’ Corporation v. … This court acknowledges the services of Attorneys Kelly Brown, A Camp Bonds, and Harry G. Davis, who as Special Masters aided in the preparation of this opinion.

Coppedge v. Depew Township

109 Okla. 117 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 6, 1925

On May 17. 1923, the bonds, dated July 1, 1923, were duly prepared and presented to the township board of directors, and were duly signed by the president of the board and attested by the clerk, and among *118 other things … Following the decision in Mi'tlsler v. Eye, supra, we think the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. By the Court: It is so ordered.

Watkinson v. Adams

187 Okla. 432 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 31, 1939

In Stevirmac Oil & Gas Co. v. … This court, in Colcord v.

Dunlop v. Wilkin-Hale State Bank

67 Okla. 128 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1917

Bryan v. Menafee, 21 Okla. 1 , 95 Pac. 471 . … approved by said board under such rules and regulations as it might prescribe.

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 13, 2000

Naylor v. Petuskey, 834 P.2d 439 , 440 (Okla. 1992) (citing Humphrey v. Denney, 757 P.2d 833 (Okla. 1988)). … Legislative intent is ascertained by scrutinizing the Board's licensure law in its entirety rather than by its individual provisions. See McNeill v. City of Tulsa, 953 P.2d 329 , 332 (Okla. 1998).

Opinion No. 77-213 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 29, 1977

In Swatek Construction Co. v. Williams, 177 Okl. 305 , 58 P.2d 585 , 587 , the Oklahoma Supreme Court quoting from Good v. … of equalization but would become effective only with future appointments to such boards.

Gates Ex Rel. Gates v. Eller

72 O.B.A.J. 1197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 2001

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79 , 989 P.2d 448, 455 . 5 . Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital Authority, 1993 OK 85 , 859 P.2d 1081, 1084 . 6 . 1998 OK 129 , 977 P.2d 1057 . 7 . Burch involved a plaintiff (Mrs. … Burch v. Allstate Insurance Co., 1998 OK 129 at ¶ 13 , 977 P.2d at 1064 . 14 . Brown v.

TULSA STOCKYARDS, INC. v. CLARK

321 P.3d 185 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 2014

Fund v. … Co. v.

Graves v. Bowles

135 Okla. 109 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 5, 1929

However, this court, in the case of School District No. 6, McLain County, v. … People v. Sholem et al. (Ill.) 87 N. E. 390 .

Opinion No. (1998)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1998

Hill v. Board of Education, 944 P.2d 930 , 933 (Okla. 1997). … Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Cloudman, 92 P.2d 837 , 841 (Okla. 1939).

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 9, 1985

State v. … See, e.g., Grant and McNamee v. Payne , 107 P.2d 307 (Nev. 1940); School District No. 1 v. Gleason , 168 P.2d 347 (Ore. 1946); Stone v. Reynolds , 54 P. 555 (Okla. 1898).

FORD v. THE OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

2026 OK 35 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 2026

. §952 Morrison v. Board of Education of Ind. Sch. Dist. No. 6 , supra; Saxon v. Macy , supra; and Randall v. Fields , supra. … See also Skouby v. Board of Educ. of Schl Dist. No. 60 , 1930 OK 273 288 P. 461 Univ. of Tex. v.

American Insurance Ass'n v. State Industrial Commission

745 P.2d 737 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 1987

See Westinghouse Elec. v. Grand River Dam Auth., Okl., 720 P.2d 713, 720 [1986]. 8 . Greer County Election Board v. Elliott, 26 Okl. 546 , 109 P. 731, 732 [1910]; Webb v. … State Board of Education, 190 Okl. 556 , 126 P.2d 241, 242 [1942] and Ritchie v. Raines, Okl.Cr., 374 P.2d 772, 775-776 [1962], 10 .

State Ex Rel. Gumm v. Albritton

98 Okla. 158 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1923

Reynolds, as members of and composing the school district board of said school district, against I. N. Albritton, J. D. … Members of the district school board shall be of the same race as the children who are entitled to attend the school of the district, not the separate school.” In Jumper et al. v.

Blinn v. Hassman

162 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1933

The judicial powers theretofore conferred upon the board of commissioners to determine matters involved in an appeal to that board were not conferred upon the council or board of councilmen. … OULLISON, V. O. J., and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, BAY-DESS, and WELCH, .I.T., concur. BUSBY, J., absent.