Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

2.00s

  • In re the Ad Valorem Valuation of Property Located at 411-417 West Fourth Street

    282 N.C. 71 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1972

    In re King, 281 N.C. 533 , 189 S.E. 2d 158 ; King v. Baldwin, 276 N.C. 316 , 172 S.E. 2d 12 . … a county board of equalization and review.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Hudgins v. Wagoner

    365 N.C. 88 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 10, 2011

    HUDGINS v. G.W. WAGONER, Jr. and W.K.S. Corporation. No. 364P10. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 10, 2011. James G. Exum, Jr., Greensboro, for G.W. Wagoner, Jr., et al. Drew Brown, Greensboro, for Hudgins, R.T.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Orange County v. Town of Hillborough

    219 N.C. App. 127 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 21, 2012

    Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of Comm’rs, 299 N.C. 620, 626 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 383 (1980). … Washington v. McLawhorn, 237 N.C. 449, 454 , 75 S.E.2d 402, 405-06 (1953).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Charitable Brotherhood

    191 N.C. 359 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 10, 1926

    In Maxwell v. Bank, 175 N. … Abbott v. Hunt, 129 N. C., 403 ; Lamb v. Baxter, 130 N. C., 67 ; Smith v. Browne, 132 N. C., 365 ; Palmer v. Lowder, 167 N. C., 333 ; Henderson v. Forrest, 184 N. C., 234 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Marriott v. Chatham County

    187 N.C. App. 491 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 4, 2007

    Defendants-appellees (defendants) are Chatham County, members of the Chatham County Board of Commissioners (Commissioners), and members of the Chatham County Planning Board (Planning Board). … Person v. Board of State Tax Com’rs, 184 N.C. 499, 503 , 115 S.E. 336, 339 (1922). The adoption of minimum criteria by Chatham County constitutes a legislative function.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Waddell v. Keller

    364 N.C. 611 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 4, 2010

    705 S.E.2d 342 (2010) Larry WADDELL v. Alvin W. KELLER, Jr., Secretary, Department of Corrections and Herbert Jackson, Administrator, Brown Creek Correctional Institution. No. 462P10. Supreme Court of North Carolina.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Leonard v. Maxwell

    216 N.C. 89 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1939

    Belk Bros. v. Maxwell, 215 N. C., 10 ; Land Co. v. Smith, 151 N. C., 70 , 65 S. E., 641 ; Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, 217 U. S., 563 . … Bickett v. State Tax Com., supra; Rapid Transit Corp. v. New York, 303 U. S., 573 ; State Board of Tax Comrs. v. Jackson, 283 U. S., 527 , 73 A. L. R., 1464; Kidd v. Alabama, 188 U. S., 730 .

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Edu.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 2, 2007

    at the time by the county administrative unit of which such board was the governing body. … Bolkhir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 356 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 4.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • O'berry, State Treasurer v. . Mecklenburg County

    198 N.C. 357 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 19, 1930

    V, sec. 5. … Askren v. Continental Oil Co. , 252 U.S. 444 ; Bowman v. Continental Oil Co. , 256 U.S. 642 ; Texas Co. v. Brown , 258 U.S. 466 ; Chicago Motor Club v. Kinney , 160 N.E. 163 ; City of Portland v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Holliday v. Long Manufacturing Co.

    18 F.R.D. 45 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 29, 1955

    In Waterman v. … Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 30, 2020

    Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. … Bragg v. W. Va.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State v. . Shipman

    202 N.C. 518 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1932

    S. v. Hightower , 187 N.C. 300 ; Loan Assn. v. Davis , 192 N.C. at p. 112; S. v. Combs, supra , at p. 675; S. v. Rhodes, ante , 101; S. v. Brewer, ante , at p. 193; S. v. … In S. v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • SUGAR CREEK CHARTER SCHOOL, INC. v. State

    366 N.C. 227 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 2012

    726 S.E.2d 849 (2012) SUGAR CREEK CHARTER SCHOOL, INC., et al v. STATE of NC, et al. No. 347P11-1. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 13, 2012. Jason B. … King, III, Greensboro, for Cleveland County Board of Education, et al. Julia C. Ambrose, Greensboro, for Cleveland County Board of Education, et al. George W. Dennis, III, Raleigh, for County of Edgecombe, et al.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Nantz

    177 N.C. App. 33 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 4, 2006

    Savings and Loan Assoc. v. Savings and Loan Comm., 43 N.C.App. 493 , 497, 259 S.E.2d 373 , 376 (1979). Little v. Board of Dental Examiners, 64 N.C.App. 67 , 69, 306 S.E.2d 534 , 536 (1983). In N.C. State Bar v. … See Builders, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Davidson v. Davidson's Executors

    8 N.C. 163 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1820

    Cited: Brown v. Brown , 25 N.C. 136 ; Weatherly v. Armfield , 30 N.C. 26 ; Gibson v. Gibson , 49 N.C. 427 ; Leathers v. Gray , 101 N.C. 164 . (188)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 14, 2020

    Right to Life, Inc. v. Fed. … Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368, 380 (1963).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Smith v. South & Western Railroad

    151 N.C. 479 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1909

    Upon tbe facts presented, the decision of this Court in Brown v. Louisburg, 126 N. C., 701, approved in Raleigh v. Railroad, 129 N. C., 265 , is decisive. … That they were not tort feasors would seem to be settled in Brown v. Louisburg, supra, in which case this Court said: “The*defendants, howeyer, were not .joint tort feasors.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Dellinger v. Belk

    34 N.C. App. 488 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 16, 1977

    Cline v. Brown, 24 N.C. App. 209 , 210 S.E. 2d 446 (1974), cert. den., 286 N.C. 412 , 211 S.E. 2d 793 (1975). … Amant v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Blount v. Spencer

    114 N.C. 770 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

    (after stating the facts): The entry made by the defendant covered a natural oyster bed, according to the definition given by this Court in State v. Willis, 104 N. … It was further provided that persons dissatisfied with the action of the Board might file a protest with the Board, have a hearing after notice to all parties in interest, and that after such hearing the decision of the Board

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Norfolk Southern Railroad v. Forbes

    188 N.C. 151 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1924

    R. v. Reid, 187 N. C., 320 . … Board of Education v. Comrs., 113 N. C., 379, 383 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.