Case law

Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing Home

76 O.B.A.J. 968 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 2005

Browning-Ferris, Inc., 1992 OK 72 , ¶ 18, *220 833 P.2d 1218, 1229 ; State v. Okl. State Bd. For Property & Cas. Rates, 1986 OK 54 , 731 P.2d 394, 398-399 . 29 . … See also Haley v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 1984 OK CIV APP 58 , ¶ 21, 696 P.2d 1046, 1050 . 32 . Facts to which the law is to be applied in the process of adjudication are called adjudicative facts.

Herron v. McCurtain County Bldg. & Loan Ass'n

203 Okla. 545 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1950

The defendants in error Lee Swarts and Birty Swarts were defendants below, as well as Travis Brown and Nora Brown and J. W. … In Martin v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 1951

OCTOBER 29, 1949 — SONGER WHICH CONCLUDED: " IT IS OPINION THAT MEMBERSHIP ON A BOARD OF EDUCATION (SCHOOL BOARD) OF A SCHOOL DISTRICT IS AN " OFFICE UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS STATE "; THAT MEMBERSHIP ON THE COUNTY EXCISE BOARD … DISTRICT AND THE OFFICE OF MEMBER OF THE COUNTY EXCISE BOARD AND BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AT THE SAME TIME; AND THAT, UNDER THE RULE ANNOUNCED AND APPLIED IN THE CASE OF " GIBSON V.

WEAVER v. DOE

371 P.3d 1170 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 2016

According to the West Virginia Court in Brown ex rel. Brown v. Genesis Healthcare Corp., 228 W.Va. 646 , 724 S.E.2d 250, 267 (2011) cert. granted, judgment vacated sub nom. Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. … See also, eg., Preston v.

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 11, 1989

Hughes Drilling Co. v. … Although the Board is not authorized to budget monies generally appropriated to the DAC, the Board does have the right and duty to communicate its recommendations regarding the Board's administrative needs to the DAC.

Opinion No. (2002)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 13, 2002

The Board shall establish an examination to be used by the Board to determine the proficiency [sic] any a chiropractic physician who seeks certification from the Board. … Grand River Dam Auth. v. State, 645 P.2d 1011 , 1016 (Okla. 1982).

BREWER v. CITY OF SEMINOLE

2014 OK 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 2014

OSCN Found Document:BREWER v. CITY OF SEMINOLE OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Research Calendar Help Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only BREWER v. … 1 Compare city of Coweta v. Doughten , 2011 OK Civ App 113, 264 P.3d 135 (Division Four) and White v. City of Del City , 2012 OK CIV APP 5 , 270 P.3d 205 (Division Two).

Ex Parte Story

83 Okla. Crim. 426 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1947

Story v. State, 73 Okla. Cr. 273 , 120 P. 2d 387 . Petitioner has heretofore filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus (Ex parte John O. Story, 75 Okla. … Petitioner’s case has been reviewed by that Board. Only the Pardon and Parole Board can give any relief to petitioner. *428 For the reasons above stated, the petition for mandamus or habeas corpus is denied.

Bridal v. Cottonwood Creek Conservancy District No. II

405 P.2d 17 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1965

Rogers v. … Setters v.

Opinion No. 72-233 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 29, 1972

Stemmons, Inc. v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp., Okl., 301 P.2d 212 (1956). … Atlantic Refining Company v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, Okl., 360 P.2d 826 (1961). Nothing in Section 509.6 of Title 70 authorizes the local board of education to disregard the open meeting statute.

Cannon v. Lane

867 P.2d 1235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1993

James v. … Williamson v.

Williams v. Tulsa Motels

958 P.2d 1282 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1998

Byford, supra note 6 at 51 (Opala, J., concurring). [8] Brown v. … Watkins, 355 S.W.2d 1, 4 (Mo.1962); Riley v. Board of Education, 15 A.D.2d 303 , 223 N.Y.S.2d 389, 391 (1962); Vogel v.

State ex rel. Hughes v. Riggs

313 P.2d 523 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1957

It is therefore plain that the board had neither the authority, nor any discretion, to allow plaintiff a pension of less than that amount. … They rely, for this contention, upon sec. 541 v (Title 11, supra), which is the section of the cited section that provides for appeals to the district court from decisions of such Boards.

Beall v. Town of Hennessey

601 P.2d 758 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1979

Joe Hickey, a member of the Board of Trustees, was present, but did not cast a vote. … Midwest City v. Harris, Okl., 561 P.2d 1357 (1977). That intent is ascertained from an examination of the language of the act as a whole in light of its general purpose and object. Adams v.

Opinion No. 70-145 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1970

Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 185 Okl. 342 , 91 P.2d 771 (1939); McGowen, et al v. … Board of Education of Union Graded School District No. 25, et al, 188 Okl. 625 , 112 P.2d 355 (1941); Independent Consol. School Dist. No. 7 of Harrah, et al v. Bowen, 199 Okl. 92 , 183 P.2d 251 , 254 (1947).

Lambert v. State

374 P.2d 783 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1962

In support of defendant’s first assignment of error, that the statute under which he stands convicted is void, the defendant relies upon Proctor v. … See Signs v. State, 35 Okl.Cr. 340 , 250 P. 938 .

Scheer v. Independent School District No. 1-26

948 P.2d 275 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1997

See Spiewak v. Board of Educ., 90 N.J. 63 , 447 A.2d 140 (1982) (tenure does not accrue until statutory time has been completed.) … Feinerman v. Board of Cooperative Educ. Serv., 48 N.Y.2d 491 , 423 N.Y.S.2d 867 , 399 N.E.2d 899 (1979); Juul v. Board of Educ., 76 A.D.2d 837 , 428 N.Y.S.2d 319 (1980). 3 . Section 6-101.23 reads in full: A.

Opinion No. 92-599 (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 14, 1992

LAIRMORE V. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS, 195 P.2D 762 (OKLA.1948). … CARTWRIGHT V. OKL. NATURAL GAS, 640 P.2D 1341 (OKLA.1982).

Starr v. Haygood

53 Okla. 358 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1916

On appeal to this court from a judgment of the county court of Muskogee county supersedeas bond was filed, executed by plaintiffs in error, Burrell Starr and Mun Brown, as principals, and J. M. … Long v. Lang & Co., 49 Okla. 342 , 152 Pac. 1078 , and cases there cited. Judgment was rendered in the trial court on June 3, 1912, in the sum of $75, and costs; and it is provided by section 1008, Rev.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1979

Senate Bill No. 33, provides for the recreation of eight state boards These boards were due to terminate under the Sunset Laws on July 1, 1979. … Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Oklahoma Tax Commission et al., (City of Tulsa et al.) Interveners 212 P.2d 462 (1949) .