Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

6.39s

  • Rochon v. Attorney General of the United States

    734 F. Supp. 543 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 17, 1990

    v. … (quoting Berry v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University, 715 F.2d 971, 981 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 868 , 107 S.Ct. 232 , 93 L.Ed.2d 158 (1986)).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia

    842 F. Supp. 2d 329 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 10, 2012

    the current duties [Brown] utilize[d] as a supervisor.” … Brown’s absence.” See Fernandez-Whitney Decl., ¶ 15.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Egan, Thomas v. US Agcy Intl Devel

    381 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 31, 2004

    See FDA v. … As we said in Sendra Corporation v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Byrd v. United States

    614 A.2d 25 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 1992

    Sykes v. United States, 585 A.2d 1335, 1338 (D.C.1991); Ramsey v. United States, 569 A.2d 142, 147 (D.C.1990). … We recently held in Poulnot v.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Jolley v. United States of America

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 24, 2023

    Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Supp. 2d 118, 127 (D.D.C. 2011), he need not plead each element of a prima facie employment discrimination case, Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1023 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (citing Brady v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Herbin v. Hoeffel

    727 A.2d 883 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 5, 1999

    Brown, with whom Hillary A. Davidson, Washington, DC, was on the brief, for appellee. Before SCHWELB, FARRELL and RUIZ, Associate Judges. … See Dada v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Tamosiunas v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    892 F.3d 422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 2018

    But when the Board’s findings are not supported by substantial evidence, the Board has acted arbitrarily, or the Board has otherwise erred in applying established law, the court must intervene. Weigand v. … In any case, if the Board deviated from its own standard without explanation, it has acted arbitrarily. FCC v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Behradrezaee v. Dashtara

    910 A.2d 349 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 2006

    See Scattered Corp. v. … A board or a committee of the board may appear to be independent, but may not always act independently. Grimes, supra, 673 A.2d at 1219 (emphasis in the original). 14 . See also Cinerama, Inc. v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw-Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

    344 F.2d 171 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 1965

    344 F.2d 171 INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW-AFL-CIO, and Its Local Union No. 155, Petitioners, v. … Its ensuing order against the Company, however, had been denied enforcement in Cross Company v. NLRB, 286 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1961).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jarvis v. Parker

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 2013

    Plaintiffs’ Complaint against Defendant Brown. … Co. v. Brunswick Assocs. Ltd. P’ship, 507 U.S. 380, 392 (1993). See also, e.g., Inst. for Policy Studies v. C.I.A., 246 F.R.D. 380, 383-86 (D.D.C. 2007).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Thomas Fortune Fay

    111 A.3d 1025 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 2015

    Rev. 425, 435-36, 438 (2012); see also Theard v. … Bar v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Steven Guerra v. Edwin Meese, III

    786 F.2d 414 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 21, 1986

    United States, 586 F.Supp. 66, 68 (E.D.Va.1984) (appropriate *417 respondent in habeas actions is generally the warden of facility where petitioner is located); Brown v. … Baker v.

    Cited 147 timesPublished
  • Kaul v. Federation of State Medical Boards

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2021

    Licensure, and the Medical Board of California. … Brown, 75 F.R.D. at 498.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williamson v. Mallory

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 9, 2018

    ) RAYNEKA WILLIAMSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … DATE: May 9, 2018 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Matter of Williams

    464 A.2d 115 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1983

    April 15, 1981) (per curiam Order); Graham v. District of Columbia, 127 A.2d 150 (D.C.1956); Perlich v. District of Columbia, 90 A.2d 227 (D.C.1952); United States v. Davis, 18 App.D.C. 280 (1901). … This is the rationale employed by the Supreme Court in Klapprott v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Abdul Ali v. Donald Trump

    959 F.3d 364 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 2020

    Reg. 13,277 (March 7, 2011) (establishing the Periodic Review Board). … Vermilya-Brown Co. v. Connell, 335 U.S. 377, 380 (1948). 4 Qassim v. Trump, 938 F.3d 375, 376 (D.C.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In re Barnwell Enterprises Ltd.

    265 F. Supp. 3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 13, 2017

    After acquiring, these shares, ECP Africa appointed four, individuals to Spencon’s board of directors: Carolyn Campbell, Bryce. Fort, Andrew. Brown, and Namita Shah. Id. at 22 . … Ltd. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Matter of Robertson

    612 A.2d 1236 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1992

    Then, after citing and quoting from Lee v. … See Sloan v. United States, 527 A.2d 1277, 1288-90 (D.C.1986) (per curiam); Jones v. United States, 560 A.2d 513 (1989); Hardy v. United States, 578 A.2d 178 (1990).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Greenfield v. United States

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 2025

    Brown v. United States, 313 A.3d 555, 560 (D.C. 2024) (quoting Bingman v. United States, 267 A.3d 1084, 1087 (D.C. 2022)). … While “[p]robable cause cannot be based on a ‘hunch’ or ‘gut’ feeling,” In re T.H., 898 A.2d 908, 912 (D.C. 2006) (quoting (Marvin) Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • International Molders & Allied Workers Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Tyler Pipe & Foundry Company, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Tyler Pipe & Foundry Company, Tyler Pipe & Foundry Company v. National Labor Relations Board

    410 F.2d 1061 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 1969

    410 F.2d 1061 INTERNATIONAL MOLDERS & ALLIED WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Tyler Pipe & Foundry Company, Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … B. v. Washington Aluminum Co., 370 U.S. 9 , 82 S.Ct. 1099 , 8 L.Ed.2d 298 (1962); N. L. R. B. v. Phaostron Instrument & Electronic Co., 9 Cir., 344 F.2d 855 (1965).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.